06/05/2025 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 06/05/2025 08:45
When your security tools trigger an alert, what happens next? For many security operations center (SOC) teams, the real work begins after the detection, in the investigation phase. You need to know not just that something happened, but what exactly happened and when, where, and how deeply the attack may have spread.
That's why retrospective analysis of network data is becoming one of the most valuable and underutilized capabilities in the security arsenal. Because the network is the only place attackers can't hide their tracks, network data is a valuable source for retrospective analysis.
And we're not the only ones saying that.
At RSA Conference 2025, NETSCOUT surveyed vetted cybersecurity professionals, all actively involved in incident response or security operations roles. One data point stood out:
84 percent of respondents said the ability to conduct a retrospective analysis of historical network data is essential.
That's a powerful validation from the front lines.
Retrospective analysis means going back in time to investigate past network activity, especially before and after an alert was triggered. It helps answer questions such as:
Unfortunately, tools such as security information and event management (SIEM), endpoint detection and response (EDR), and many network detection and response (NDR) platforms don't store enough historical data, or only store it conditionally (for example, if an alert was triggered). That's a huge limitation. If no detection = no data, you're blind to the big picture.
The best source for historical visibility is network packet data. Why?
This was a key takeaway from our RSA Conference 2025 survey results: Knowledge (not alerts) bridges the gap between detection and response. And network data is the best source of that knowledge.
But what happens if there isn't a detection alert at all? That's where threat hunting comes in.
The simple difference is this:
Threat hunters leverage current threat intelligence, frameworks such as MITRE ATT&CK, and their own expertise to search for signs of malicious activity that might have slipped past traditional defenses.
To do that effectively, they need historical network visibility-the ability to dig into past traffic and uncover patterns, behaviors, or indicators that didn't trigger a real-time alert. Proactive threat hunting becomes one of the most powerful ways to surface hidden threats and reduce dwell time.
Use Cases That Matter
Here are four ways retrospective network analysis adds real-world value:
When historical network visibility is missing, investigation becomes less of a process and more of a gamble. Analysts are forced to act on partial evidence, unreliable assumptions, or whatever data happens to be available at the moment.
This creates cascading risks:
You don't just lose time; you lose trust in your visibility, your response, and your security posture. Without network-based retrospective analysis, your SOC is reacting in the dark, and every missed connection becomes a missed opportunity to stop the breach.
Network-based retrospective analysis isn't just a nice-to-have; it's the foundation for decisive, defensible security operations. It gives your analysts the ability to move beyond alerts and see the full narrative: who, what, when, where, and how.
When teams can look back with clarity, they:
In a world where speed matters and certainty is critical, historical context becomes your competitive advantage. The faster you can understand what happened, the faster you can take back control.
NETSCOUT's Omnis Cyber Intelligence with Adaptive Threat Analytics is purpose-built to enable retrospective analysis at scale, combining continuous packet-level visibility with powerful analytics so your team can uncover what happened, even in cases where the threat went undetected.
Learn how NETSCOUT Omnis Cyber Intelligence can help by providing comprehensive network visibility with scalable deep packet inspection (DPI) to detect, investigate, and respond to threats more efficiently.