11/12/2026 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 11/12/2026 12:03
The Champlain Hudson Power Express is a massive infrastructure undertaking designed to bring hydroelectric power from Canada to New York, adding dependable electricity to a region facing growing demand. Near the end of that journey, E-J Electric was responsible for a critical piece of the project: the terrestrial cable pulls near Astoria that would help bring the new transmission system online.
The work was underground. The environment was New York City. And there wasn't much room for things to go wrong.
After a conventional single-braid rope failed after seven pulls, E-J needed a pulling line better suited to the demands of the job.
Yale Cordage brought them GlideLine.
The result was more than a longer-lasting rope. It was one less major variable for E-J to plan around.
| 42 | ~84K FT | 0 | 6X | 90% |
| UNDERGROUND PULLS | NEARLY 16 MILES PULLED | ROPE FAILURES | SERVICE LIFE VS SINGLE BRAID | STRENGTH RETAINED* |
The Project
The Champlain Hudson Power Express is a massive 339-mile high-voltage transmission project designed to deliver clean hydroelectric power into New York City. E-J Electric's work focused on critical underground cable pulls near Astoria, Queens, where an already crowded network of buried utilities, constrained urban corridors, and complex underground infrastructure made the final stretch especially demanding. On a project of this scale, every pull mattered. And every setback had the potential to create another costly delay. These weren't ordinary cable pulls. Neither were the consequences of a failure.
The Champlain Hudson Power Express is a massive 339-mile high-voltage transmission project designed to deliver clean hydroelectric power into New York City. E-J Electric's work focused on critical underground cable pulls near Astoria, Queens, where an already crowded network of buried utilities, constrained urban corridors, and complex underground infrastructure made the final stretch especially demanding. On a project of this scale, every pull mattered. And every setback had the potential to create another costly delay.
| Project: Champlain Hudson Power Express | Avg. Pull: ~2,000 ft. |
| Location: Astoria, New York | Longest Pull: ~2,250 ft. |
| Application: Underground high-voltage transmission | Conductor Weight: ~27 lbs./ft/ |
| Pull Tension: ~5,000 - 35,000 lbs. | Equipment: Condux Tesmec PL1750 puller |
| The Stakes: Final terrestrial pulls on an infrastructure project years in the making. |
The Challenge & Solution
An underground transmission pull already has enough moving pieces.
Crews. Equipment. Permitting. Weather. Traffic. Street access. Existing infrastructure. And thousands of feet of conduit you can't see inside.
E-J had already seen what happened when the pulling rope became another variable.
A smaller-diameter conventional 12-strand, single-braid HMPE rope previously used on the project failed after seven underground pulls. Unlike a rope with a protective outer jacket, its load-bearing fibers were exposed to abrasion. Repeated wear weakened sections of the rope until they could no longer withstand the tension required to complete a continuous pull. The rope ultimately broke roughly 1,000 feet into a 2,000-foot pull in Queens.
There was no simple reset button.
The cable couldn't simply be pulled back out and the pull restarted. Addressing a failure like this could mean locating the break, excavating in the middle of a city block, securing expedited permits and navigating more than a century of existing underground infrastructure.
And replacing the rope wasn't necessarily quick either. A new industrial reel could require an estimated four to six weeks to manufacture. The alternatives were an emergency splice, waiting for a replacement, or tying up additional capital in backup reels.
For E-J, the problem wasn't simply finding a stronger rope.
It was removing one unpredictable variable from an already complicated job.
GlideLine was developed to address a specific need in electric utility work: maintaining strength and durability over repeated pulls in harsh underground environments.
For E-J, Yale supplied a 1-1/8-inch, 4,000-foot GlideLine with a catalog minimum breaking strength of 88,020 pounds.
Its double-braid HMPE construction combines a high-strength core with a tightly braided protective jacket. That construction is designed to withstand repeated underground use while reducing the sawing and cutting action against conduit that can occur with other rope constructions.
That proved particularly important in the directional FRE conduit on the E-J project, where the customer reported GlideLine provided superior wear resistance.
GlideLine also incorporated REDLIGHTâ„¢ Technology, a highly visible red section that alerts crews as they approach the end of the rope. On a complex underground pull, that advance warning helps crews avoid accidentally overpulling the rope, potentially damaging equipment or disrupting the operation. It was a feature E-J valued enough to suggest making the red section even longer for future transmission applications.
Then it was time to see how it performed.
E-J completed 42 high-voltage underground pulls using the same GlideLine reel.
Average pull length: approximately 2,000 feet.
Pull tension: 5,000 to 35,000 pounds.
Rope failures: zero.
The previous rope had completed seven pulls before failure.
GlideLine completed six times as many-and was still in service when E-J finished the work.
The project ended. The rope didn't.
Field performance answered one question.
Yale wanted to answer another:
After 42 pulls, what was left?
Samples from the working end of the field-used GlideLine were sent to Yale Cordage's facility in Saco, Maine for break testing.
Across all samples-including samples with identified localized point damage-the rope retained an average 86.8% of its original minimum breaking strength.
When samples with localized damage were excluded, average residual strength was 90.0% of MBS, or 79,208 pounds.
After approximately 84,000 feet of cumulative underground pulling, GlideLine still had substantial strength remaining.
That's not simply longer rope life.
For a contractor planning dozens of critical pulls, it's predictability.
A reel of GlideLine costs more upfront than conventional single-braid rope.
E-J considered it worth it.
"When you consider the consequences of a rope failure on a project like this, reliability matters a lot more than the upfront cost. GlideLine gave us that reliability."
E-J Electric
Because the purchase price is only one part of what a pulling rope costs for a project.
Longer service life can mean fewer replacement-rope decisions, fewer planned changeouts, less backup inventory and less exposure to emergency procurement.
Most importantly, reliable rope performance removes one concern when crews, equipment, permits, conductor and street access have already been coordinated around a pull.
E-J summed up the experience simply:
"GlideLine rope worked in a place where another rope failed."
E-J Senior Project Manager, Clean Energy
The solution wasn't just a product handoff.
E-J brought the application and field expertise. Yale provided rope engineering and technical guidance, working through its distribution partner to support the project.
Together, they helped ensure the rope was properly specified for the equipment and the demands of the job.
And that collaboration extended beyond a single project.
As E-J put it:
"We will continue to work with our distributors and partners at Yale to ensure that we properly size and spec our ropes for future machines as well as replacements."
The right way to evaluate pulling rope isn't simply cost per reel.
It's what that reel delivers over the life of the project.
How many pulls are planned? How many reels could the job require? How much labor goes into changeouts? How much backup inventory is needed? And what could an unexpected rope failure cost once crews, equipment and permits are already in place?
Visit our ROI Calculator Tool to calculate your potential cost per pull and project savings with GlideLine.
PULL SMARTER, NOT HARDER.