10/07/2026 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 10/07/2026 12:56
Estimated reading time: 8 minutes
Aviation modernization succeeds when infrastructure, technology, operations, and people move forward as one connected program. Like small cities, airports operate as interconnected ecosystems, making aviation modernization an enterprise-wide challenge. Infrastructure improvements, technology upgrades, and sustainability initiatives can have a ripple effect and disrupt daily operations if treated individually. A roadway opens on schedule, but its traffic assumptions no longer match the terminal plan. A digital platform passes technical testing, but operating teams aren't trained to use it. A facility reaches substantial completion, but connected systems, permits, procedures, or sustainability requirements lag behind. Each effort may appear successful on its own, while the broader program falls short of the value it was intended to deliver.
This is why aviation owners need a more integrated approach. Our Integrated Program Delivery connects planning, design, construction, systems, commissioning, operational readiness, and lifecycle performance into a unified strategy. Its value is the ability to manage the decisions, dependencies, and handoffs that sit between scopes, contracts, disciplines, and organizations.
Traditional project controls are essential for tracking defined scope, cost, and schedule, but many of the risks that disrupt aviation programs develop outside those boundaries. They emerge where infrastructure meets technology, where construction sequencing meets airport operations, or where commissioning ends, and operational responsibility begins.
These interface risks are often difficult to see because they don't belong to one project team. They may live in separate schedules, move through different contracts, or surface only when a downstream activity can't proceed. By then, the choices are fewer, the cost of change is higher, and the impact on operations can be greater.
Integrated delivery creates a program-level view of these connection points. It establishes shared governance, decision rights, controls, and escalation paths, so dependencies can be resolved before they become field conflicts or operational constraints. Integration isn't simply better coordination. It is a management discipline for spaces where traditional accountability becomes blurred.
The advantage: Integrated delivery manages the white space between projects, where responsibility is shared but consequences are not.
Integrated Program Delivery is built for change. Its greatest benefit is not eliminating uncertainty; it's creating the visibility leaders need to make better decisions before options narrow. By evaluating planning, design, procurement, construction, systems integration, and operational readiness together, teams can anticipate downstream impacts before they become constraints or change orders.
The advantage: Integrated delivery moves critical thinking upstream, enabling programs to absorb change while staying focused on outcomes.
A master schedule is necessary, but it doesn't guarantee that every team is working from the same definition of readiness since construction, technology, and operations teams often measure progress differently. A construction team may view a space as complete when physical work is finished. A technology team may need power, communications, cybersecurity authorization, test data, and access control before implementation can begin. Operations may define readiness only after procedures, staffing, training, emergency protocols, and maintenance support are in place. Integrated delivery aligns these perspectives by consolidating schedules, risks, requirements, interfaces, commissioning, and operational readiness plans into a single decision framework. That shift is especially important in aviation, where new assets must enter service without disrupting daily operations. Activation is not the final step; it's a program requirement that should shape delivery from the beginning.
The advantage: This turns the schedule from a reporting tool into a decision-making system, so leaders can see what must be true for the next milestone to succeed.
One of the least discussed benefits of integrated delivery is that it reduces the burden on owners. Instead of reconciling fragmented updates and competing priorities, leaders gain a clearer view of the decisions, risks, and operational impacts that matter most.
The advantage: This preserves owner control while maintaining the distinct expertise of individual partners. It gives owners greater clarity to act earlier, with stronger visibility and accountability across the full program.
Integrated Program Delivery isn't a single contracting method. It can be applied through program and construction management, owner's representative, executive program management, program delivery partner, technical advisory, or other structures. The scope may range from targeted services to a fully integrated team supporting a program from strategy through activation and lifecycle planning.
While the contracting structure can vary, the objective remains the same: align capabilities within a framework defined by shared goals, clear decision rights, disciplined risk management, and accountability. Integration is strongest when governance and incentives follow the program's objectives, not the boundaries of individual work packages.
Depending on the program, an integrated team can bring together:
We are applying this model to complex aviation programs where projects, systems, and stakeholders must move forward together.
Los Angeles International Airport
As owner's representative for the Landside Access Modernization Program, our team is helping LAWA advance a multibillion-dollar initiative that integrates transportation infrastructure, mobility solutions, and passenger experience improvements. Our team provides project and construction management from procurement through closeout, helping align governance, delivery strategy, design, construction, risk, and stakeholder priorities across an active airport environment. This connected approach helps LAWA advance major mobility improvements while protecting active airport and roadway operations. Learn more
As lead designer for the $1.24 billion Central Terminal Area Roadways, Utilities, and Ground Transportation Center project, our work coordinates planning and design across critical roadway, utility, and transportation infrastructure. By aligning multiple stakeholders, inaterconnected systems, concurrent construction activities, and active airport operations, we helped advance one of the nation's largest airport redevelopment efforts while supporting continuous passenger movement and airport functionality. Learn more
Federal Aviation Administration
Through the FAA's Technical Support Services Contract, our federal aviation team provides engineering, construction, and infrastructure support for facilities nationwide. By connecting program management, technical delivery, and stakeholder coordination across a diverse modernization and sustainment portfolio, we enable the FAA to deliver critical infrastructure improvements that strengthen the safe, reliable, and resilient operation of the National Airspace System. Learn more
King Salman International Airport
As a delivery partner, we support full-lifecycle management for airfield assets and landside infrastructure, including roads, utilities, tunnels, bridges, rail connections, and landscaping. Our work spans development, design oversight, permitting, procurement, construction supervision, commissioning, handover, and operational readiness. Bringing these phases and interfaces together supports consistent decisions across a highly complex new airport program. Learn more
Each program is different, but the principle is the same: connected oversight helps clients manage interfaces, sustain operations, and align delivery to shared outcomes.
Aviation modernization doesn't end when a facility opens or a system goes live. The true measure is how well those investments improve the operating environment over time, making airports safer, more resilient, more efficient, and more secure for passengers, employees, airlines, and airport operators.
The future of successful delivery depends on connecting infrastructure, technology, operations, and people as one integrated system. Integrated Program Delivery brings those connections into focus-creating the clarity, coordination, and accountability needed to navigate complexity, accelerate outcomes, and deliver lasting operational value.
Our experts combine deep aviation domain expertise with infrastructure delivery, digital aviation, systems integration, cybersecurity, and operational readiness. Whether we serve as program manager, owner's representative, executive program manager, or delivery partner, we tailor the model to each client while maintaining one view of objectives, interfaces, risks, and outcomes. Learn more about our aviation project delivery.
Donna Williams has extensive experience in program and project management, business development, engineering design, and construction on government and private-sector programs and projects. Her board expertise includes operations, administration, budgeting, negotiations, sales, and leadership/relationship development. She has specific mechanical experience that includes design of heating, ventilating, air-conditioning, plumbing, and fire protection and detection systems for commercial, industrial, and aviation facilities.