Celcuity Inc.

08/13/2026 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 08/13/2026 15:16

Quarterly Report for Quarter Ending June 30, 2026 (Form 10-Q)

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with our unaudited condensed financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis or set forth elsewhere in this Quarterly Report, including information with respect to our plans and strategy for our business and expected financial results, includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. You should review the "Risk Factors" discussed in Part I, Item 1A of the 2025 10-K, and the cautionary statements elsewhere in this Quarterly Report, for a discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in the following discussion and analysis.

Overview

We are a biotechnology company focused on developing and commercializing targeted therapies for the treatment of multiple solid tumor indications. Our first FDA-approved product is REVTORPYKTM (gedatolisib), a potent, pan-PI3K and mTORC1/2 inhibitor that comprehensively blockades the PAM pathway. Its mechanism of action and pharmacokinetic properties are differentiated from other currently approved and investigational therapies that target PI3Kα, AKT or mTORC1 alone or together. Our Phase 3 clinical trial, VIKTORIA-1, evaluated gedatolisib in combination with fulvestrant, with or without palbociclib, for the treatment of patients with HR+/HER2- ABC. Data from this trial is the basis for FDA approval of REVTORPYK for use in adult patients with HR+/HER2- ABC without a PIK3CA mutation detected following progression on or after treatment with at least one line of endocrine therapy in the metastatic setting. Results for the PIK3CA mutant cohort of the VIKTORIA-1 study have been released. Our Phase 3 clinical trial, VIKTORIA-2, is an ongoing trial incorporating two independent studies, Study 1 and Study 2, in two separate cohorts of patients with ABC who are treatment-naïve in the advanced setting. Study 1 is evaluating gedatolisib in combination with palbociclib and fulvestrant as first-line treatment for patients with endocrine-resistant HR+/HER2- ABC. Study 2 is evaluating gedatolisib in combination with palbociclib and letrozole as first-line treatment for patients with endocrine- sensitive HR+/HER2- ABC. A Phase 1b/2 clinical trial, CELC-G-201, evaluating gedatolisib in combination with darolutamide in patients with mCRPC, is ongoing.

Gedatolisib

In April 2021, we obtained exclusive global development and commercialization rights to gedatolisib under a license agreement with Pfizer. We believed gedatolisib's unique mechanism of action, differentiated chemical structure, favorable pharmacokinetic properties, and intravenous route of administration offered distinct advantages over currently approved and investigational therapies that targeted PI3Kα, AKT, or mTORC1, alone or together.

Overcomes limitations of therapies that only inhibit a single class I PI3K isoform, AKT, or one mTOR kinase complex.

Gedatolisib is a pan-class I isoform PI3K inhibitor with low nanomolar potency for the p110α, p110β, p110γ, and p110δ isoforms and the mTORC1 and mTORC2 complexes. By targeting all class I PI3K isoforms and mTORC1/2, gedatolisib induces comprehensive inhibition of the PAM pathway. Each PI3K isoform and mTOR complex is known to preferentially affect different signal transduction events that involve tumor cell survival, depending upon the aberrations associated with the linked pathway. When a therapy only inhibits a single class I PI3K isoform (e.g., alpelisib, a PI3Kα inhibitor), AKT (e.g., capivasertib, an AKT inhibitor) or only one mTOR kinase complex (e.g., everolimus, an mTORC1 inhibitor), numerous feedforward and feedback loops between the PI3K isoforms and mTOR complexes cross-activate the uninhibited sub-units. This, in turn, induces compensatory resistance that reduces the efficacy of isoform specific PI3Kα, AKT, or mTORC1 kinase inhibitors. Inhibiting all four PI3K isoforms and both mTOR complexes, as gedatolisib does, thus prevents the confounding effect of isoform interaction that may occur with isoform-specific PI3K inhibitors and the confounding interaction between PI3K isoforms, AKT, and mTOR.

Better tolerated by patients than oral PI3K and mTOR drugs.

Gedatolisib is administered intravenously on a four-week cycle of three weeks-on, one week-off, in contrast to the orally administered pan-PI3K or dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitors that are no longer being clinically developed. Oral pan-PI3K or PI3K/mTOR inhibitors have repeatedly been found to induce significant side effects that were not well tolerated by patients. This typically leads to a high proportion of patients requiring dose reductions or treatment discontinuation. The challenging toxicity profile of these drug candidates ultimately played a significant role in the decisions to halt their development, despite showing promising efficacy. By contrast, gedatolisib's comprehensive inhibition of the PAM pathway at low nanomolar potency, IV route of administration, and pharmacokinetic properties enables it to achieve optimal anti-proliferative effects on tumor cells without inducing the levels of hyperglycemia, rash, and diarrhea typically associated with oral single-component inhibitors of the PAM pathway.

Isoform-specific PI3K or mTORC1 inhibitors administered orally were developed to reduce toxicities in patients. While the range of toxicities associated with single-component PAM inhibitors is narrower than oral pan-PI3K or PI3K/mTOR inhibitors, administering them orally on a continuous basis can still lead to challenging toxicities. The experience with an FDA-approved oral p110-α specific inhibitor, PIQRAY, illustrates the challenge. In its Phase 3 pivotal trial, PIQRAY was found to induce a Grade 3 or 4 adverse event ("AE") related to hyperglycemia in 39% of patients evaluated. In addition, 26% of patients discontinued alpelisib due to AEs. By contrast, in the 103-patient dose expansion portion of the Phase 1b clinical trial with gedatolisib, only 7% of patients experienced Grade 3 or 4 hyperglycemia and less than 9% discontinued treatment.

FDA Approval of REVTORPYK

In January 2026, the FDA accepted the submission of our NDA for gedatolisib in HR+/HER2- PIK3CA WT ABC. The FDA granted Priority Review and assigned a PDUFA goal date of July 17, 2026. On July 14, 2026, the FDA approved the Company's NDA for REVTORPYK (gedatolisib) in HR+/HER2- ABC, for use in adult patients without a PIK3CA mutation detected following progression on or after treatment with at least one line of endocrine therapy in the metastatic setting.

We subsequently announced that REVTORPYK in combination with fulvestrant, with or without palbociclib, was recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network® ("NCCN®") as a preferred Category 1 second-line and/or subsequent-line therapy for the treatment of patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer without a PIK3CA mutation following progression on or after treatment with at least one line of endocrine therapy.

The build-out of the commercialization infrastructure needed to support a successful launch of REVTORPYK is complete and commercial launch activities for REVTORPYK commenced immediately after approval. Shipments of REVTORPYK are expected to begin late in the third quarter of 2026.

To make gedatolisib available to patients prior to commercial availability of REVTORPYK, in August 2026, we opened an Expanded Access Program ("EAP") to participating physicians on behalf of eligible patients, and we have begun to distribute gedatolisib to those physicians.

Market Opportunity

Based on our analysis of published epidemiological data, we estimate that approximately 37,000 patients in the U.S. are receiving second-line treatment for HR+/HER2- ABC. Using internal duration of treatment estimates and Wholesale Acquisition Cost (WAC) of REVTORPYK, we estimate the total addressable market for gedatolisib in the second-line setting is potentially more than $6.0 billion annually.

Clinical Development

As of June 30, 2026, at least 1,130 patients and healthy volunteers have received gedatolisib in 12 completed or ongoing clinical trials. Of these, 123 patients with solid tumors were treated with gedatolisib as a single agent in two clinical trials, 36 healthy volunteers were treated in two clinical trials, and the remaining 971 patients received gedatolisib in combination with other anti-cancer agents in eight clinical trials. Additional patients received gedatolisib in combination with other anti-cancer agents in 10 investigator-sponsored clinical trials.

HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer

B2151009 Phase 1b Trial

A Phase 1b dose-finding trial with an expansion portion for safety and efficacy evaluated gedatolisib when added to either the standard doses of palbociclib plus letrozole or palbociclib plus fulvestrant in patients with HR+/HER2- ABC. PI3K mutation status was not used as an eligibility criterion. Patient enrollment for the trial is complete.

A total of 138 patients with HR+/HER2- ABC were dosed in the clinical trial. As of June 30, 2026, four patients from this study continue to receive study treatment, each of whom has received study treatment for more than six years.

35 patients were enrolled in two dose escalation arms to evaluate the safety and tolerability and determine the maximum tolerable dose ("MTD") of gedatolisib when used in combination with the standard doses of palbociclib and endocrine therapies. The MTD was determined to be 180 mg administered intravenously once weekly.
103 patients were enrolled in one of four expansion arms (A, B, C, D) to determine if the triplet combination of gedatolisib plus palbociclib and letrozole or gedatolisib plus palbociclib and fulvestrant produced a superior objective response (OR), compared to historical control data of the doublet combination (palbociclib plus endocrine therapy). All patients received gedatolisib in combination with standard doses of palbociclib and endocrine therapy (either letrozole or fulvestrant). In Arms A, B, and C, patients received an intravenous dose of 180 mg of gedatolisib once weekly. In Arm D, patients received an intravenous dose of 180 mg of gedatolisib on a four-week cycle of three-weeks-on, one-week-off. Objective response was determined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.0, or RECIST v1.0.

Source: Layman R., et. al, Lancet Oncol., 2024

VIKTORIA-1 Phase 3 Trial (Second-Line Setting)

Our Phase 3 clinical trial, VIKTORIA-1, evaluated gedatolisib in combination with fulvestrant, with or without palbociclib, for the treatment of patients with HR+/HER2- ABC, and is the basis for the FDA Approval. Over 200 clinical sites in North America, Europe, South America, and Asia-Pacific participated in the study.

The VIKTORIA-1 Phase 3 clinical trial involves two independent studies (Study 1 and Study 2) that enable separate evaluation of subjects according to their PIK3CA status. Subjects who met eligibility criteria and had PIK3CA WT tumors (Study 1) were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive a regimen of either gedatolisib, palbociclib, and fulvestrant (Arm A), gedatolisib and fulvestrant (Arm B), or fulvestrant (Arm C). The primary completion date and the database cut-off date for Study 1 was May 30, 2025. Subjects who met eligibility criteria and had PIK3CA MT tumors (Study 2) were randomly assigned (3:3:1) to receive a regimen of either gedatolisib, palbociclib, and fulvestrant (Arm D), alpelisib and fulvestrant (Arm E), or gedatolisib and fulvestrant (Arm F). The primary completion date and the database cut-off date for Study 2 was March 9, 2026.

PIK3CA Wild-Type Cohort

On July 28, 2025, we announced topline data from the PIK3CA WT cohort of the VIKTORIA-1 Phase 3 clinical trial and on October 18, 2025, at the ESMO congress, we presented additional efficacy and safety results from this cohort. The key efficacy and safety data from the PIK3CA WT cohort showed:

The "gedatolisib triplet" (gedatolisib, fulvestrant and palbociclib) demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS among patients, reducing the risk of disease progression or death by 76% compared to fulvestrant (based on a hazard ratio [HR] of 0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17-0.35; p<0.0001). The median PFS, as assessed by blinded independent central review ("BICR"), was 9.3 months with the gedatolisib triplet versus 2.0 months with fulvestrant, an incremental improvement of 7.3 months.
The "gedatolisib doublet" (gedatolisib and fulvestrant) also demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS among patients, reducing the risk of disease progression or death by 67% compared to fulvestrant (HR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.24-0.48; p<0.0001). The median PFS, as assessed by BICR, was 7.4 months with the gedatolisib doublet versus 2.0 months with fulvestrant, an incremental improvement of 5.4 months.
The ORR of the gedatolisib triplet was 31% compared to 1% with fulvestrant and the median duration of response ("DOR") was 17.5 months. The ORR of the gedatolisib doublet was 28.3% and the median DOR was 12.0 months. The median DOR was not determinable for fulvestrant because there was only one objective response.
The gedatolisib triplet and doublet were generally well tolerated in the trial with mostly low-grade TRAEs. The most common Grade 3 TRAEs for the gedatolisib triplet, gedatolisib doublet, and fulvestrant groups included neutropenia (52.3%, 0%, and 0.8% of patients, respectively); stomatitis (19.2%, 12.3%, and 0% of patients, respectively) rash (4.6%, 5.4%, and 0% of patients, respectively); and hyperglycemia (2.3%, 2.3%, and 0% of patients, respectively). The primary Grade 4 TRAEs for the gedatolisib triplet and gedatolisib doublet groups were neutropenia (10.0% and 0.8%, respectively), leukopenia (0.8% in the gedatolisib triplet group) and pneumonitis (0.8% in the gedatolisib doublet group). TRAEs led to the discontinuation of study treatment in 2.3% of patients in the gedatolisib triplet group, 3.1% in the gedatolisib doublet group, and 0% in the fulvestrant group.

The detailed results from cohort 1, PIK3CA WT cohort, established several new milestones in the history of drug development for HR+/HER2- ABC:

The hazard ratios for the gedatolisib triplet and doublet are more favorable than have ever been reported by any Phase 3 trial for patients with HR+/HER2- ABC.
The 7.3- and 5.4-months incremental improvements in median PFS for the gedatolisib triplet and gedatolisib doublet over fulvestrant, respectively, are higher than have ever been reported by any Phase 3 trial for patients with HR+/HER2- ABC receiving at least their second line of therapy.
Gedatolisib is the first inhibitor targeting the PAM pathway to demonstrate positive Phase 3 results in patients with HR+/HER2- PIK3CA WT ABC whose disease progressed on or after treatment with a CDK4/6 inhibitor.
The median DOR and incremental ORR improvement relative to control for the gedatolisib triplet and doublet are the highest reported for an endocrine therapy-based regimen in 2L HR+/HER2- ABC.

The median PFS benefit of the gedatolisib triplet and doublet compared to fulvestrant was consistent across subgroups with the gedatolisib triplet showing higher clinical benefit in nearly all subgroups compared to the gedatolisib doublet, particularly for patients who were pre/perimenopausal, endocrine therapy resistant, or had visceral metastases. For patients enrolled in the United States and Canada, median PFS was 19.3 months (HR=0.13; 90% CI: 0.07-0.29) for the gedatolisib triplet and 14.9 months (HR=0.35; 90% CI: 0.17-0.76) for the gedatolisib doublet.

In December 2025, we presented updated efficacy and safety results from the VIKTORIA-1 Phase 3 PIK3CA WT cohort at the 2025 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium including patient sub-group analyses, safety analyses and patient reported outcomes for well-being measures.

For patients enrolled in the United States, Canada, Western Europe, and Asia Pacific, median PFS was 16.6 months with the gedatolisib triplet and 7.1 months with the gedatolisib doublet versus 1.9 months for fulvestrant (HR=0.14; 95% CI: 0.08-0.28; p<0.0001).
Both gedatolisib regimens delayed time to definitive deterioration versus fulvestrant according to patient reported outcomes for well-being measures that included mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression (the EQ-5D-5L score). The median time to definitive deterioration was 23.7 months (HR=0.39; 95% CI: 0.25-0.67; p = 0.0003) for patients treated with the gedatolisib triplet and not reached for the gedatolisib doublet (HR=0.37; 95% CI: 0.24-0.66; p = 0.0003) versus 4.0 months for fulvestrant. Additionally, for the first eight cycles of treatment, the patients' assessment of their well-being remained stable relative to their assessment prior to starting treatment with gedatolisib.

PIK3CA Mutant-Type Cohort

On May 1, 2026, we announced positive topline results from Study 2 (the PIK3CA MT cohort) of the VIKTORIA-1 Phase 3 trial, and on June 2, 2026, in a late-breaking abstract oral session at the American Society of Clinical Oncology ("ASCO") Annual Meeting, we presented additional efficacy and safety results from this cohort.

The primary efficacy analysis of the gedatolisib triplet demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS compared to alpelisib, a PI3Kα inhibitor, and fulvestrant. The secondary endpoint comparing the gedatolisib doublet versus alpelisib plus fulvestrant, which was not part of the primary efficacy analysis in the hierarchical order, also demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS compared to alpelisib and fulvestrant. Both gedatolisib regimens were generally well tolerated, with manageable safety profiles, and presented no new safety signals.

In the trial, the gedatolisib triplet demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in median PFS among patients, increasing the likelihood of survival without disease progression or death by two times compared to alpelisib plus fulvestrant (based on a hazard ratio [HR] of 0.50; 95% CI: 0.37-0.68; p<0.0001). The median PFS, as assessed by blinded independent central review, was nearly two-times longer, 11.1 months versus 5.6 months, compared to alpelisib plus fulvestrant. The ORR of the gedatolisib-triplet was 49% compared to 26% with alpelisib plus fulvestrant, and the median DOR for the gedatolisib-triplet was 15.7 months compared to 7.5 months for alpelisib plus fulvestrant.

For the gedatolisib doublet, the median PFS was more than two-times longer, 11.3 months versus 5.6 months, compared to alpelisib plus fulvestrant (HR=0.51; 95% CI: 0.33-0.79; descriptive p=0.0013). The ORR of the gedatolisib doublet was 36%, and the median DOR was 24.2 months.

The topline gedatolisib triplet efficacy data from the VIKTORIA-1 Phase 3 PIK3CA MT cohort established several new milestones in the history of drug development for HR+/HER2- ABC:

First Phase 3 trial to demonstrate superiority of one PAM inhibitor versus another.
The median PFS of 11.1 months for the gedatolisib triplet is the highest reported by any Phase 3 trial for patients with HR+/HER2- ABC receiving a regimen including endocrine therapy as second-line treatment.
The ORR of 49% for the gedatolisib triplet is the highest reported by any Phase 3 clinical trial for a regimen including endocrine therapy in second-line HR+/HER2- ABC.

The gedatolisib triplet and gedatolisib doublet were generally well tolerated in the trial with mostly low-grade TRAEs. The most common Grade 3+ TRAEs for the gedatolisib triplet, the gedatolisib doublet, and alpelisib plus fulvestrant groups included neutropenia (58.8%, 0%, and 0.7% of patients, respectively); stomatitis (16.3%, 5.8%, and 5.3% of patients, respectively); rash (6.5%, 5.8%, and 15.1% of patients, respectively); and hyperglycemia (2.6%, 0%, and 14.5% of patients, respectively). For patients who received the gedatolisib triplet and gedatolisib doublet, 5.2% and 3.8%, respectively, of patients discontinued gedatolisib due to an AE. For patients who received alpelisib, 19.1% discontinued treatment with alpelisib due to an AE. One Grade 5 TRAE in the gedatolisib-triplet group, which was related to palbociclib, was reported; no Grade 5 TRAEs were reported in the gedatolisib-doublet group, and two Grade 5 TRAEs were reported in the alpelisib plus fulvestrant group.

Overall survival, a key secondary endpoint in VIKTORIA-1, while immature at the time of the analysis, showed promising trends for both the gedatolisib triplet and the gedatolisib doublet.

We intend to submit the data from Study 2, the MT cohort, of the VIKTORIA-1 Phase 3 clinical trial to the FDA in the third quarter of 2026 as an sNDA. We intend to submit VIKTORIA-1 Phase 3 clinical trial data to other regulatory authorities outside the U.S. following the sNDA submission.

Recent Developments

Analyses of the mean number of gedatolisib treatment cycles patients received in the PIK3CA WT and MT cohorts of VIKTORIA-1 were also updated as of August 2, 2026, with a median follow-up period of approximately 21 months and 17 months for the PIK3CA WT and MT cohorts, respectively. For patients who received the gedatolisib triplet, the mean number of treatment cycles on gedatolisib was 9.0 and 10.0 cycles in the PIK3CA WT and MT cohorts, respectively, with 12% (16) and 22% (34) of patients still receiving gedatolisib therapy in each cohort, respectively. For patients who received the gedatolisib doublet, the mean number of treatment cycles on gedatolisib was 9.7 and 11.3 cycles in the PIK3CA WT and MT cohorts, respectively, with 12% (15) and 19% (10) of patients still receiving gedatolisib therapy in each cohort, respectively.

VIKTORIA-2 Phase 3 Trial (First-Line Setting)

VIKTORIA-2 is evaluating the safety and efficacy of patients with endocrine-resistant and endocrine-sensitive HR+/HER2- ABC who are treatment-naïve in the metastatic setting. Patients will be assigned manually according to their endocrine sensitivity status to either Study 1 (endocrine-resistant) or Study 2 (endocrine-sensitive) and subsequently be randomized to a treatment arm. Each study will have independent statistical analysis plans that will include separate primary endpoints. The primary efficacy analyses for both Study 1 and Study 2 of VIKTORIA-2 will evaluate the entire intent-to-treat population enrolled in their respective study (combined WT and MT); primary endpoints for patient cohorts based on their PIK3CA status (e.g., WT or MT) are not included. The control arms for Study 1 and Study 2 will evaluate ribociclib combined with either fulvestrant (Study 1) or letrozole (Study 2).

Study 1 is expected to enroll approximately 440 patients with treatment-naïve endocrine-resistant ABC whose cancer progressed while receiving or within 12 months of completing adjuvant endocrine therapy. The trial will evaluate the efficacy and safety of gedatolisib combined with palbociclib and fulvestrant (Arm A) compared to ribociclib combined with fulvestrant (Arm B). We expect topline data for this group to be available by the end of 2028. Study 2 is expected to enroll approximately 740 subjects with treatment-naïve endocrine-sensitive ABC whose cancer relapsed or progressed 12 months or more after completion of adjuvant endocrine therapy, or those with de novo metastatic disease without prior endocrine therapy exposure. The trial will evaluate the efficacy and safety of gedatolisib combined with palbociclib and letrozole (Arm C) compared to ribociclib combined with letrozole (Arm D). We expect topline data for this group to be available in 2030.

Subjects in each study will be randomized 1:1 to either investigational treatment (Arm A, Study 1; Arm C, Study 2) or standard-of-care control (Arm B, Study 1; Arm D, Study 2). Approximately 200 clinical sites in North America, Europe, South America and Asia-Pacific will participate in the study, including many sites included in the VIKTORIA-1 clinical trial.

The clinical trial primary endpoints for the VIKTORIA-2 clinical trial are PFS, per RECIST 1.1 criteria, as assessed by BICR. The statistical analyses of Study 1 and Study 2 are each independent of the other. For Study 1, the primary objective is to compare the PFS of Arm A (gedatolisib + palbociclib + fulvestrant) to Arm B (ribociclib + fulvestrant). For Study 2, the primary objective is to compare the PFS of Arm C (gedatolisib + palbociclib + letrozole) to Arm D (ribociclib + letrozole).

Development of the subcutaneous gedatolisib formulation is ongoing with the goal of demonstrating clinical equivalence to the current intravenous formulation of gedatolisib. The subcutaneous formulation is aimed to support potential future indications for gedatolisib regimens that may result in duration of treatment periods greater than several years.

Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

CELC-G-201 Phase 1b/2 Trial

We received approval from the FDA in mid-2023 to proceed with the clinical development of gedatolisib in combination with Nubeqa® (darolutamide), an approved androgen receptor inhibitor, for the treatment of patients with mCRPC. We have since initiated the CELC-G-201 Phase 1b/2 trial, that will enroll up to 54 participants with mCRPC who progressed after treatment with an androgen receptor inhibitor. The first patient was dosed in this trial in February 2024.

The primary objectives of the Phase 1b portion of the trial include assessment of the safety and tolerability of gedatolisib in combination with darolutamide and determination of the recommended Phase 2 dose ("RP2D") of gedatolisib. The primary objective of the Phase 2 portion of the trial is to assess the radiographic PFS at six months of patients who received the RP2D.

In the Phase 1b portion of the clinical trial, 38 patients with mCRPC were randomly assigned to receive 600 mg of darolutamide twice daily combined with either 120 mg of gedatolisib in Arm 1 or 180 mg of gedatolisib in Arm 2. In both arms, gedatolisib was administered once weekly for three weeks, then one week off. Additionally, all patients received prophylactic treatment for stomatitis.

On June 30, 2025, we announced preliminary data for the CELC-G-201 Phase 1b/2 trial, utilizing a May 30, 2025, data cut-off. Based on these data, we amended the clinical trial protocol to enable exploration of additional doses in the Phase 1b portion of this clinical trial to determine the RP2D. Once RP2D is determined, an additional 12 participants are planned to be enrolled in the Phase 2 portion of the study at the RP2D level to enable evaluation of 30 participants treated with the RP2D of gedatolisib.

On October 18, 2025, at the ESMO congress, we presented updated clinical results for the CELC-G-201 Phase 1b/2 trial based on an August 15, 2025, data cut-off. Among the 38 patients enrolled, 61% had received one line of prior systemic therapy and 39% had received at least two or more lines of prior therapy. Median duration of follow-up was 9.0 months.

The six-month radiographic progression-free survival ("rPFS") rate and median rPFS for patients from both arms combined was 67% and 9.1 months, respectively. For patients treated with 120 mg of gedatolisib, the six-month rPFS rate was 74% and median rPFS was 9.5 months. For patients treated with 180 mg of gedatolisib, the six-month rPFS rate was 61% and the median rPFS was 7.4 months.

The combination of gedatolisib and darolutamide was generally well tolerated in the trial with mostly low-grade TRAEs. No dose limiting toxicities were observed in either arm. The only Grade 3 TRAEs for patients from both arms combined included rash (5.3%), stomatitis (2.6%), and pruritus (2.6%); no Grade 3 hyperglycemia was reported. Additionally, no Grade 4 or 5 TRAEs were observed, and no patients discontinued study treatment due to a TRAE.

In the amended Phase 1/1b portion of the clinical trial, up to six patients are planned to be enrolled in up to three arms and treated with different doses. In the dose finding portion of the amended Phase 1/1b portion of the clinical trial, evaluation of a 240 mg dose of gedatolisib was completed. No AEs led to treatment discontinuation of gedatolisib and dose limiting toxicity criteria for dose reduction were not met. Evaluation of a 300 mg dose is ongoing. Once the Phase 1/1b portion of the study is completed, Celcuity expects to select the RP2D level(s) and control arm options for the randomized Phase 2 portion of the study. In the Phase 2 portion of the study, up to 84 additional subjects will be enrolled. All patients will also receive standard doses of darolutamide. We expect to provide updated clinical data and additional visibility into its mCRPC development strategy during the fourth quarter of 2026.

Collaborations

Investigator-Sponsored Trials

In an investigator-sponsored Phase 2 clinical trial, 44 patients with HER2+ PIK3CA mutated metastatic breast cancer were treated with gedatolisib plus standard doses of trastuzumab-pkrb. No prophylaxis for stomatitis was administered. The median number of prior anti-HER2 therapies enrolled patients received in the metastatic setting was four or more; 86% of patients had received at least three prior anti-HER2 therapies. The data cut-off was February 10, 2025.

Key efficacy and safety results, as presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting in June 2025, showed:

The ORR among all patients enrolled was 43%.
Median PFS was 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.0-7.7).
Median overall survival was 24.7 months (95% CI; 17.3-NA).
No patients discontinued gedatolisib due to a treatment-related AE.
One (2.3%) patient experienced Grade 3 hyperglycemia.

An investigator-sponsored trial has been initiated in collaboration with the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Massachusetts General Hospital to evaluate gedatolisib in combination with abemaciclib and letrozole in patients with endometrial cancer.

Recent Developments

On June 8, 2026, we completed the issuance of $575.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 2032 Notes, including the Underwriters' exercise of their over-allotment option in full. The net proceeds from the 2032 Note Offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses, were $557.2 million. See Note 9. Debt for additional information.
On June 8, 2026, we utilized $137.4 million of the net proceeds from the 2032 Notes to complete a voluntary prepayment of all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest, fees, costs and expenses under the Amended A&R Loan Agreement. See Note 9. Debt for additional information.
On July 14, 2026, we announced that the FDA approved REVTORPYK for the treatment of patients with HR+/HER2- ABC without a PIK3CA mutation detected following progression on or after treatment with at least one line of endocrine therapy in the metastatic setting. REVTORPYK is the only inhibitor of class I PI3K isoforms (α, β, δ, γ) and mTOR complexes mTORC1 and mTORC2 to receive FDA approval. The approval of REVTORPYK (gedatolisib) is based on positive clinical results from the PIK3CA WT cohort of the VIKTORIA-1 Phase 3 trial. See the VIKTORIA-1 Phase 3 Trial update above for additional information.
On July 30, 2026, we announced that REVTORPYK (gedatolisib) in combination with fulvestrant, with or without palbociclib, is recommended by the NCCN® Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) as a preferred Category 1 second-line and/or subsequent-line therapy following progression on or after treatment with at least one line of endocrine therapy.

The NCCN Guidelines® play a pivotal role in decision-making processes for individuals involved in cancer care all over the world, including physicians, nurses, pharmacists, payers, and patients and their families. The guidelines present expert recommendations for cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment, as well as cancer care options, and are utilized in cancer treatment decision-making to drive positive patient outcomes. NCCN® is a not-for-profit alliance of 33 leading cancer centers devoted to patient care, research, and education. NCCN makes no warranties of any kind whatsoever regarding their content, use, or application and disclaims any responsibility for their application or use in any way.

In August 2026, to make gedatolisib available to patients prior to commercial availability of REVTORPYK, Celcuity opened an EAP to participating physicians on behalf of eligible patients, and we have begun to distribute gedatolisib to those physicians.

Results of Operations

We have not generated any revenue from product sales or other sources to date, and we continue to incur significant operating and other expenses related to our ongoing operations. As a result, we are not and have never been profitable and have incurred losses in each period since our inception in 2012. During the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, we reported a net loss of $78.9 million and $45.3 million, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, we reported a net loss of $131.7 million and $82.3 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $580.6 million and cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of $754.0 million.

Components of Operating Results

Revenue

To date, we have not generated any revenue. Upon the execution of the Pfizer license agreement in April 2021, we acquired exclusive world-wide licensing rights to develop and commercialize gedatolisib. In 2022, we initiated VIKTORIA-1, a Phase 3 clinical trial, to support regulatory approval to market gedatolisib. The VIKTORIA-2 Phase 3 trial and CELC-G-201 Phase 1b/2 trial are ongoing.

Pursuant to the FDA's Real-Time Oncology Review program, in September 2025 we made the first pre-submission of our NDA to the FDA and completed the final NDA submission to the FDA on November 17, 2025. The FDA formally accepted our NDA submission on January 16, 2026, designated it for Priority Review, and assigned a PDUFA target goal date of July 17, 2026. On July 14, 2026, we received the FDA Approval, and we expect to generate revenue from sales of the drug commencing in the third quarter of 2026.

Research and Development

Since our inception, we have primarily focused on research and development of gedatolisib. Research and development expenses primarily include:

employee-related expenses related to our research and development activities, including salaries, benefits, recruiting, travel and stock-based compensation expenses;
laboratory supplies;
consulting fees paid to third parties;
clinical trial costs;
validation costs for gedatolisib; and
facilities expenses.

Conducting research and development is central to our business model. We plan to continue to increase our research and development expenses for the foreseeable future as we continue to develop gedatolisib, conduct the VIKTORIA-2 Phase 3 and CELC-G-201 Phase 1b/2 clinical trials, continue follow-up activities for the VIKTORIA-1 Phase 3 clinical trial, and conduct other studies and clinical trials.

Selling, General and Administrative

Selling, general and administrative expenses primarily consist of employee-related costs, including salaries, benefits, stock-based compensation and recruiting costs for personnel in our executive, sales, market access, marketing, commercial operations, legal, finance and support functions.

Non-employee-related expenses consist primarily of professional and consulting fees, software costs, the acquisition of data and other launch-related activities incurred to support the commercialization of REVTORPYK, legal services associated with being a public company, director and officer insurance, investor relations and travel expenses for our selling, general and administrative personnel.

We anticipate that our selling, general and administrative expenses will continue to increase in future periods, reflecting both increased costs in connection with the commercialization of REVTORPYK, an expanding infrastructure, and increased professional fees associated with public company regulatory developments and requirements, and other compliance matters.

Interest Expense

Interest expense to date is primarily related to the Amended A&R Loan Agreement, the 2031 Notes and the 2032 Notes.

Loss on Debt Extinguishment

The loss on debt extinguishments relates to the voluntary prepayment of all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest, fees, costs and expenses under the Amended A&R Loan Agreement on June 8, 2026.

Interest Income

Interest income consists of interest income earned on our cash, cash equivalents, and investment balances.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025

The following table summarizes our results of operations (in thousands):

Three Months Ended June 30,

Increase (Decrease)

2026

2025

$

Percent Change

Statements of operations data:

Operating expenses:

Research and development

$

31,077

$

36,415

$

(5,338

)

(15

)

%

Selling, general and administrative

35,041

7,594

27,447

361

Total operating expenses

66,118

44,009

22,109

50

Loss from operations

(66,118

)

(44,009

)

(22,109

)

50

Other (expense) income:

Interest expense

(5,423

)

(3,204

)

(2,219

)

69

Interest income

4,154

1,945

2,209

114

Loss on debt extinguishment

(11,477

)

-

(11,477

)

NM

Other expense, net

(12,746

)

(1,259

)

(11,487

)

912

Net loss before income taxes

(78,864

)

(45,268

)

(33,596

)

74

Income taxes

-

-

-

-

Net loss

$

(78,864

)

$

(45,268

)

$

(33,596

)

74

%

NM indicates that the percentage change is not meaningful.

Research and Development

During the three months ended June 30, 2026, our research and development expenses were $31.1 million, representing a decrease of $5.3 million, or 15%, compared to the same period in 2025. The decrease was primarily due to a $7.0 million decrease in clinical trial costs, which was primarily driven by decreased costs for the VIKTORIA-1 Phase 3 clinical trial, and a $5.0 million decrease in license milestone costs. These decreases were partially offset by a $3.8 million increase in employee-related and consulting expenses, of which $0.9 million related to stock-based compensation, and a $2.9 million increase in manufacturing and other costs.

Selling, General and Administrative

During the three months ended June 30, 2026, our selling, general and administrative expenses were $35.0 million, representing an increase of $27.4 million, or 361%, compared to the same period in 2025. The increase was primarily due to a $14.5 million increase in employee-related expenses, of which $3.3 million related to stock-based compensation. The increase in employee-related expenses was primarily driven by the hiring of additional personnel within our commercial function to support the anticipated launch of REVTORPYK. The remaining $12.9 million increase was primarily due to a $10.8 million increase in costs to support pre-commercial launch activities, including consulting expenses, professional fees and expanding infrastructure costs, and a $2.1 million increase in other administrative expenses.

In the aggregate, $23.4 million of the $27.4 million selling, general and administrative increase related to commercial headcount additions and other launch-related activities.

Interest Expense

During the three months ended June 30, 2026, our interest expense was $5.4 million, and represents an increase of $2.2 million, or 69%, compared to the same period in 2025. Interest expense during the three months ended June 30, 2026, was attributable to the 2031 Notes, the 2032 Notes and the Amended A&R Loan Agreement. Interest expense during the three months ended June 30, 2025, was attributable to the Amended A&R Loan Agreement. The increase was primarily due to the issuance of $201.3 million aggregate principal amount of the 2031 Notes in July 2025 and $575.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 2032 Notes in June 2026, and the $30.0 million distribution of the Term D Loan in September 2025. The increase was partially offset by the payoff of the Amended A&R Loan Agreement in June 2026. The $5.4 million of interest expense includes $1.5 million of non-cash interest expense.

Interest Income

During the three months ended June 30, 2026, our interest income was $4.2 million, and represents an increase of $2.2 million, or 114%, compared to the same period in 2025. The increase was primarily the result of a higher invested cash balance, partially offset by lower market interest rates.

Loss on Debt Extinguishment

During the three months ended June 30, 2026, we recognized an $11.5 million non-cash loss on debt extinguishment related to the voluntary prepayment of all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest, fees, costs and expenses under the Amended A&R Loan Agreement.

Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025

The following table summarizes our results of operations (in thousands):

Six Months Ended June 30,

Increase (Decrease)

2026

2025

$

Percent Change

Statements of operations data:

Operating expenses:

Research and development

$

64,140

$

66,174

$

(2,034

)

(3

)

%

Selling, general and administrative

52,485

13,968

38,517

276

Total operating expenses

116,625

80,142

36,483

46

Loss from operations

(116,625

)

(80,142

)

(36,483

)

46

Other (expense) income:

Interest expense

(11,508

)

(6,387

)

(5,121

)

80

Interest income

7,905

4,264

3,641

85

Loss on debt extinguishment

(11,477

)

-

(11,477

)

NM

Other expense, net

(15,080

)

(2,123

)

(12,957

)

610

Net loss before income taxes

(131,705

)

(82,265

)

(49,440

)

60

Income taxes

-

-

-

-

Net loss

$

(131,705

)

$

(82,265

)

$

(49,440

)

60

%

NM indicates that the percentage change is not meaningful.

Research and Development

During the six months ended June 30, 2026, our research and development expenses were $64.1 million, representing a decrease of $2.0 million, or 3%, compared to the same period in 2025. The decrease was primarily due to a $12.1 million decrease in clinical trial costs, which was primarily driven by decreased costs for the VIKTORIA-1 Phase 3 clinical trial, and a $5.0 million decrease in license milestone costs. These decreases were partially offset by a $7.0 million increase in employee-related and consulting expenses, of which $2.0 million related to stock-based compensation, and an $8.1 million increase in manufacturing and other costs.

Selling, General and Administrative

During the six months ended June 30, 2026, our selling, general and administrative expenses were $52.5 million, representing an increase of $38.5 million, or 276%, compared to the same period in 2025. The increase was primarily due to a $20.4 million increase in employee-related expenses, of which $5.2 million related to stock-based compensation. The increase in employee-related expenses was primarily driven by the hiring of additional personnel within our commercial function to support the anticipated launch of REVTORPYK. The remaining $18.1 million increase was primarily due to a $14.8 million increase in costs to support pre-commercial launch activities, including consulting expenses, professional fees and expanding infrastructure costs, and a $3.3 million increase in other administrative expenses.

In the aggregate, $31.4 million of the $38.5 million selling, general and administrative increase related to commercial headcount additions and other launch-related activities.

Interest Expense

During the six months ended June 30, 2026, our interest expense was $11.5 million, and represents an increase of $5.1 million, or 80%, compared to the same period in 2025. Interest expense during the six months ended June 30, 2026, was attributable to the 2031 Notes, the 2032 Notes and the Amended A&R Loan Agreement. Interest expense during the six months ended June 30, 2025, was attributable to the Amended A&R Loan Agreement. The increase was primarily due to the issuance of $201.3 million aggregate principal amount of the 2031 Notes in July 2025 and $575.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 2032 Notes in June 2026, and the $30.0 million distribution of the Term D Loan in September 2025. The increase was partially offset by the payoff of the Amended A&R Loan Agreement in June 2026. The $11.5 million of interest expense includes $3.1 million of non-cash interest expense.

Interest Income

During the six months ended June 30, 2026, our interest income was $7.9 million, and represents an increase of $3.6 million, or 85%, compared to the same period in 2025. The increase was primarily the result of a higher invested cash balance, partially offset by lower market interest rates.

Loss on Debt Extinguishment

During the six months ended June 30, 2026, we recognized an $11.5 million non-cash loss on debt extinguishment related to the voluntary prepayment of all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest, fees, costs and expenses under the Amended A&R Loan Agreement.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity

Since our inception, we have incurred losses and cumulative negative cash flows from operations. Through June 30, 2026, we have funded our operations primarily through private placements, registered offerings of our equity securities, convertible notes, and borrowings under loan agreements. From inception through June 30, 2026, we raised aggregate net proceeds of $473.0 million through sales of our securities and $752.1 million through the issuance of our convertible notes. Additionally, prior to its payoff, we raised aggregate net proceeds of $120.8 million through borrowings under the Amended A&R Loan Agreement. As of June 30, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $580.6 million, cash and cash equivalents were $182.0 million, and our short-term investments were $572.0 million.

Capital Resources

To help meet our liquidity requirements, we have entered into various equity and financing arrangements. As of June 30, 2026, our material cash requirements for the operations of our business consisted primarily of the current and long-term liabilities noted on our condensed balance sheets, as well as other commitments, including the following notable items:

In February 2022, we entered into an Open Market Sale Agreement with Jefferies, as agent, pursuant to which we may offer and sell, from time to time, through Jefferies, shares of our common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $50.0 million, which amount was subsequently increased to $400.0 million on January 9, 2026. During the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, we did not sell any shares pursuant to the Open Market Sale Agreement.
In May 2024, we entered into the A&R Loan Agreement, which amended and restated, in its entirety, the Prior Loan Agreement. In May 2025, we entered into the First Amendment to the A&R Loan Agreement; in July 2025, we entered into the Second Amendment to the A&R Loan Agreement; and in September 2025, we entered into the Third Amendment to the A&R Loan Agreement.

In September 2025, we received funding of the $30.0 million Term D Loan (as defined in the Amended A&R Loan Agreement) upon achievement of the Term D Milestone (as defined in the Amended A&R Loan Agreement), resulting in net proceeds of $27.7 million. In connection with the funding of the Term D Loan, we issued warrants with an exercise price of $14.84 per share to purchase an aggregate of 50,537 shares of our common stock to Innovatus, Oxford, and certain of its affiliates.

In June 2026, we completed a voluntary prepayment of all outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest, fees, costs and expenses under the Amended A&R Loan Agreement, resulting in a payment of $137.4 million (see Note 9. Debt).

In July 2025, we issued and sold 2,172,368 Shares and Pre-Funded Warrants to purchase up to 400,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the Equity Underwriting Agreement with the Representatives of the 2031 Underwriters, resulting in net proceeds of $91.6 million (see Note 7. Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)).
In August 2025, we issued $201.3 million aggregate principal amount of convertible notes, resulting in net proceeds of $194.9 million (see Note 9. Debt).
In June 2026, we issued $575.0 million aggregate principal amount of convertible notes, resulting in net proceeds of $557.2 million (see Note 9. Debt).
During the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, investors exercised 45,788 and 695,650 warrants, net of shares withheld for exercise price, respectively, which generated less than $0.1 million and $5.6 million in cash, respectively (see Note 7. Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)). There were no warrant exercises during the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025.

Liquidity and capital resource requirements

We expect that our research and development and selling, general and administrative expenses will increase as we support the commercialization of REVTORPYK, continue to develop gedatolisib, conduct the VIKTORIA-2 Phase 3 and CELC-G-201 Phase 1b/2 clinical trials, continue follow-up activities for the VIKTORIA-1 Phase 3 clinical trial, conduct other studies and clinical trials, and pursue other business development activities. We expect to use cash on hand, together with the funds received under the debt and equity financings described above, and any future revenue received from commercial sales of REVTORPYK, to fund our research and development expenses, clinical trial costs, sales and marketing expenses, general corporate expenses, capital expenditures and working capital.

Based on our current business plan, we believe that our current cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, will provide sufficient cash to finance our operations at least into 2029.

Our expectations as to how long our current capital resources will be sufficient to fund our operations are based on assumptions that may not be accurate, and we could use our current capital resources sooner than we expect. In addition, we may seek to raise additional capital to finance capital expenditures and operating expenses over the next several years as we support the commercialization of REVTORPYK, expand our infrastructure, commercial operations and research and development activities, and take advantage of financing or other opportunities that we believe to be in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders. Additional capital may be raised through the sale of common or preferred equity or convertible debt securities, entry into debt facilities or other third-party funding arrangements. The sale of equity and convertible debt securities may result in dilution to our stockholders and those securities may have rights senior to those of our common stock. Agreements entered into in connection with such capital raising activities could contain covenants that would restrict our operations or require us to relinquish certain rights. Additional capital may not be available on reasonable terms, or at all.

Cash Flows

The following table summarizes the primary sources and uses of cash and cash equivalents (in thousands):

Six Months Ended June 30,

2026

2025

Net cash and cash equivalents provided by (used in):

Operating activities

$

(110,491

)

$

(72,065

)

Investing activities

(296,071

)

90,118

Financing activities

422,908

5,786

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

$

16,346

$

23,839

Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities was $110.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2026, and consisted primarily of a net loss of $131.7 million and a decrease in working capital of $5.2 million, partially offset by non-cash expenses of $26.4 million. The $5.2 million decrease in working capital was primarily due to a $7.5 million decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses, partially offset by a $2.3 million decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets. The $26.4 million of non-cash expenses consisted of $12.2 million of stock-based compensation expense, $11.5 million loss on debt extinguishment, $2.6 million of net non-cash interest expense and $0.1 million of depreciation expense.

Net cash used in operating activities was $72.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2025, and consisted primarily of a net loss of $82.3 million, partially offset by non-cash expenses of $7.2 million and an increase in working capital of $3.0 million. The $7.2 million of non-cash expenses consisted of $5.1 million of stock-based compensation expense, $2.0 million of net non-cash interest expense and $0.1 million of depreciation expense. The $3.0 million increase in working capital was primarily due to an $8.2 million increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses, partially offset by a $5.2 million increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $296.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2026, and consisted of $295.7 million of net purchases of short-term investments in U.S. treasury securities and $0.4 million in purchases of property and equipment and capitalized software.

Net cash provided by investing activities was $90.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2025, and consisted of $90.2 million of net proceeds from short-term investments in U.S. treasury securities, partially offset by $0.1 million in purchases of property and equipment.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $422.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2026, and consisted of $557.4 million of net proceeds from the 2032 Notes, $2.7 million of proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options and employee stock purchases, partially offset by $137.0 million of payments for the extinguishment of the Amended A&R Loan Agreement and $0.2 million of payments for secondary registration statement costs.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $5.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2025, and consisted of net proceeds of $5.6 million from the exercise of common stock warrants and $0.3 million from the exercise of employee stock options and employee stock purchases, partially offset by $0.1 million of debt issuance costs and payments for secondary registration statement costs.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

From time-to-time new accounting pronouncements are issued by the FASB or other standard setting bodies and adopted by us as of the specified effective date. These pronouncements are more fully described in Note 2 to our unaudited condensed financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report. We are currently evaluating the method of adoption and the impact of any recent accounting pronouncements not yet adopted on our unaudited condensed financial statements and related disclosures.

Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates

Our management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based on our unaudited condensed financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these unaudited condensed financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the unaudited condensed financial statements, as well as the reported expenses during the reporting periods. These items are monitored and analyzed by us for changes in facts and circumstances, and material changes in these estimates could occur in the future. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances; the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Changes in estimates are reflected in reported results during the period in which they become known. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates.

Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in the 2025 10-K and in Note 2 to our unaudited condensed financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report. There were no changes to our critical accounting estimates, as disclosed in the 2025 10-K, during the six months ended June 30, 2026. Of our significant accounting policies, we believe that the following reflect the critical accounting estimates used in the preparation of our unaudited condensed financial statements:

Stock-based compensation; and
Clinical trial costs.
Celcuity Inc. published this content on August 13, 2026, and is solely responsible for the information contained herein. Distributed via EDGAR on August 13, 2026 at 21:16 UTC. If you believe the information included in the content is inaccurate or outdated and requires editing or removal, please contact us at [email protected]