10/07/2026 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 10/07/2026 07:23
RFP GUIDANCE
NFWF is committed to operating in full compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, and Executive Orders. We continuously monitor legal and regulatory developments to ensure our policies, procedures, and operations align with current federal directives. We encourage all applicants to do the same.
The ability and extent to which NFWF is able to make awards is contingent upon receipt of funds from federal agencies and/or other funding partners. Final funding decisions will be made based on the applications received and the level and timing of funding received by NFWF.
TIMELINE
Dates of activities are subject to change. Please check the program page of the NFWF website for the most current dates and information [Great Plains Grassland Fund]. NFWF strongly encourages applicants to meet with NFWF staff to discuss project ideas prior to the application deadline.
Applicant Webinar [Register here]: October 23, 2026 1:00 p.m. MT
Full Proposal Due Date: January 27, 2027, 9:59 p.m. MT
Awards Announced: May 2027
OVERVIEW
The Great Plains Grassland Fund (GPGF) seeks proposals to help permanently protect intact grasslands that are the centerpiece of rural economies in the United States. This funding opportunity will build on community-based, voluntary rancher-led efforts and invest in land protection and management strategies to reduce the risk of grassland conversion in high-value landscapes. The fundamental conservation strategy used in this program will be voluntary conservation easements, but applicants are encouraged to supplement easements with the use of other tools such as grassbanks, grazing associations, or other community-led models that help mitigate the pressure to convert grasslands in the surrounding area.
The primary purpose of this funding opportunity is to protect grasslands that are at high risk of conversion to cropland or intensive developed uses and leverage those protected grasslands to help strengthen the management and resilience of surrounding working lands. Projects will build upon locally led, rancher-driven efforts and promote durable, flexible, and integrated land protection and management strategies designed to reduce the likelihood of grassland conversion. Funders for this program will not make claims on carbon or purchase carbon credits that could be generated from the avoided conversion of the grasslands.
Applicants should include all potential conservation easement properties into one application rather than submitting multiple applications. In some cases, when a proposal requests funding for multiple properties, NFWF may offer partial funding for a specific subset of properties. We also encourage applications proposing a model or concept for deployment without specific properties identified in advance. Partnerships between multiple organizations are encouraged, especially those that engage organizations funded under the Grassland Resilience and Conservation Initiative, as targeting land protection alongside existing grassland restoration work can help create synergies and connectivity between programs.
GRANT AWARD INFORMATION
Up to $10 million will be available to support projects in 2027. All grant awards require a minimum 1:1 match of cash or contributed goods and services. Both federal and non-federal funds may be considered as match. Match from partners engaging in supplemental land restoration work coordinated alongside land protection may also be considered as match. Please include ALL matching sources no matter the status (intend to apply, application submitted, pledged, received). Other NFWF programs involving land conservation typically receive proposals with matching funds at a 5:1 ratio or greater.
GEOGRAPHIC FOCUS
This funding opportunity will support land conservation efforts on grass-dominated landscapes across the Great Plains. See the figure below for the program boundary for the Great Plains Grassland Fund.
PROGRAM PRIORITIES
Preferential consideration will be given to proposals that can demonstrate their ability to achieve more than one of the program priorities below.
Conservation Priorities:
Required Documentation:
PROJECT METRICS
To better gauge progress on individual grants and to ensure greater consistency of project data provided by multiple grants, the Great Plains Grassland Fund has a list of metrics in Easygrants for applicants to choose from for future reporting. We ask that applicants select only the most relevant metrics from this list for their project (all possible program metrics are shown in the table below). Please ensure your starting value for all metrics is 0. We record only the metrics achieved in the period of performance of the grant. If you think an applicable metric has not been provided, please contact Dani Tinnin ([email protected]) to discuss acceptable alternatives.
Metrics Pertaining to All Projects:
| Project Activity | Recommended Metric | Additional Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Conservation Easements | # Acres protected under easement | Enter the number of acres protected under long-term easement (permanent or >30-yr). Assuming the specific parcel(s) has been identified, in the NOTES indicate what % of natural land cover would have been cleared in the absence of the easement(s). Please also indicate the acres of wetland, timberlands, and/or grazing lands protected within the easement in the NOTES. |
| Conservation Easements | # Acres connected | Enter the total number of conservation acres permanently connected as a result of this easement (include your proposed easement in this total). |
| Conservation Easements | # Miles under long-term easement | Enter the number of stream/riverine/riparian miles protected within your proposed property area or as a result of the easement. |
| Land Acquisitions | # Acres acquired in fee | Enter # acres acquired in fee. If the parcel has been identified, in the NOTES indicate whether there is a competing offer (Yes/No) or potential zoning change (Yes/No), and what % of natural land cover would be cleared in the absence of the acquisition(s). Please also indicate the acres of wetland, timberlands, and/or grazing lands protected within the acquisition in the NOTES. |
| Land Acquisitions | # Acres connected | Enter the total number of protected acres (e.g., public conservation acres, designated private nature preserves, other private acres) permanently connected as a result of this acquisition (include your proposed land acquisition in this total). |
| Land Acquisitions | # Miles acquired | Enter the number of stream/riverine/riparian miles protected within your proposed property area or as a result of the acquisition. |
Metrics Pertaining to Project Restoration and Sustainable Management Activities:
| Project Activity | Recommended Metric | Additional Guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Habitat Management | Acres with managed grazing | Enter the number of acres with managed grazing (i.e., promoting plant growth above and below ground, improving wildlife habitat, and maximizing soil health through grazing approaches that optimize stocking rates, livestock rotations, utilization rates, and plant rest and recovery, including development of associated grazing infrastructure). In the NOTES section, please describe how you arrived at the reported acre value. |
| Habitat Management | Acres burned | Enter the number of acres to which prescribed burning was applied. In the NOTES, specify the average frequency (in years) at which prescribed burning is expected to occur in the future, and the vegetation being burned (e.g., shrubland, grassland). If the purpose of the prescribed burning is to remove invasive vegetation, count those acres in the "Removal of invasives - Acres restored" metric instead. |
| Habitat Management | Miles of fencing improved | Enter miles of fencing modified to be wildlife-friendly and allow passage by migratory wildlife. In the NOTES, describe the fence modification (e.g., raising the bottom wire, drop fence, markers, fladry) and target species (e.g., pronghorn, Prairie Chicken). |
| Habitat Management | Miles of fencing removed | Enter miles of fencing removed to allow passage by migratory wildlife. In the NOTES, describe the target species (e.g., pronghorn). |
| Habitat Management | Acres under management using virtual fence technology | Enter the number of acres covered by a virtual fencing system to manage livestock grazing. In the NOTES, please describe how you arrived at the reported value. Please describe whether virtual fencing is replacing existing physical fencing. |
| Habitat Restoration | Land restoration - Acres restored | Enter the number of acres associated with any practice that restores grasslands to a functional condition (e.g., seeding crop to grass). In the NOTES, specify landcover prior to restoration (barren, cropland, grass, shrubland, herbaceous wetland, wet meadow) and post-restoration (grassland). |
| Habitat Restoration | Removal of invasives - Acres restored | Enter the number of acres restored by removal of invasive vegetation. In the NOTES, specify vegetation removed (e.g., eastern red cedar, shrubs, grasses/forbs), desired dominant vegetation (i.e., native grasses), average frequency (in years) of future treatment, and whether removed vegetation will be left on-site to decompose (Yes/No). Note whether prescribed burning is included as part of the restoration and indicate how many acres will undergo a prescribed burn. |
| Habitat Restoration | Riparian restoration - Acres restored | Enter the number of riparian acres restored, including riparian buffers. In the NOTES, specify the: 1) restoration practices (e.g., Zeedyk structures, beaver mimicry); 2) landcover type prior to planting (e.g., barren, cropland, grassland); 3) dominant vegetation being planted (e.g., shrub, grass), and average width of the riparian buffer. |
| Habitat Restoration | Wet meadow restoration - Acres Restored | Enter the number of mesic wet meadow acres restored. In the NOTES, specify the: 1) restoration practices (e.g., Zeedyk structures, beaver mimicry); 2) landcover type prior to planting (e.g., barren, cropland, grassland); and 3) dominant vegetation being planted (e.g., shrub, grass). |
| Capacity, Outreach, Incentives | # people with changed behavior | Enter the number of landowners implementing land conservation efforts as a result of project support. In the NOTES, please specify how you arrived at the reported value. |
| Capacity, Outreach, Incentives | # jobs created | Enter the # of individuals hired to directly work on the project (non-volunteers). Jobs should be directly engaged in grant activities, funded by the grant, and should not have existed prior to the grant. The starting value should be zero and target value should be a whole number. In the NOTES, provide the FTE for the jobs created. |
| Capacity, Outreach, Incentives | # jobs sustained | Enter the # of paid jobs that are partially or fully sustained through this grant. Jobs should have existed prior to the grant, be funded by the grant, and be directly engaged in project activities. The starting value should be zero and target value should be a whole number. In the NOTES, provide the FTE for the jobs sustained. |
| Capacity, Outreach, Incentives | # participants receiving gov't agency cost-share or financial assistance | Enter the number of producers that enrolled in government cost share or financial assistance programs as a result of the project's technical assistance activities. In the NOTES, specify which program(s) (e.g., NRCS EQIP) and how you will track enrollment. |
| Capacity, Outreach, Incentives | $ value of gov't agency cost-share or financial assistance | Enter the dollar value of federal, state, or local government agency cost share or financial assistance received by agricultural producers as a result of the project's technical assistance activities. In the NOTES, specify which program(s) (e.g., NRCS EQIP) and how the value was estimated. |
| Capacity, Outreach, Incentives | Acres covered by gov't agency cost-share or financial assistance | Enter the number of acres enrolled in government agency cost share or financial assistance programs as a result of the project's technical assistance activities. In the NOTES, specify which program(s) (e.g., NRCS EQIP). |
ELIGIBILITY
Eligible and Ineligible Entities
EVALUATION CRITERIA
All proposals will be screened for relevance, accuracy, completeness and compliance with NFWF and funding source policies. Proposals will then be evaluated based on the extent to which they meet the following criteria.
| Conservation Outcomes | Budget | Technical |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Partnership and Community Impact - The applicant organization partners and engages collaboratively with local community members, leaders, community-based organizations, and other relevant stakeholders to develop and implement the proposed project. This ensures long-term sustainability and success of the project, integration into local programs and policies, and community acceptance of proposed actions. Partners or communities are enlisted to broaden the sustained impact from the project. Describe the community characteristics of the project area, identify any communities impacted, describe outreach and community engagement activities and how those will be monitored and measured. Use data to support descriptions and submit letters of support from community partners and/or collaborators demonstrating their commitment to the project and engagement in project activities as proposed.
Budget - Costs are allowable, reasonable and budgeted in accordance with NFWF's Budget Instructions cost categories. Federally funded projects must be in compliance with OMB Uniform Guidance as applicable.
Matching Contributions - Matching Contributions consist of cash, contributed goods and services, volunteer hours, and/or property raised, spent, and acquired for the Project during the Period of Performance. Larger match ratios and matching fund contributions from a diversity of partners are encouraged and will be more competitive during application review.
Cost-Effectiveness - Cost-effectiveness analysis identifies the economically most efficient way to meet project objectives. Project includes a cost-effective budget that balances performance risk and efficient use of funds. Cost-effectiveness evaluation includes, but is not limited to, an assessment of effective direct/indirect costs across all categories in the proposed budget according to the type, size and duration of the project and project objectives. Project budgets will be compared to similar projects to ensure proposed costs across all budget categories are reasonable for the activities being performed and the outcomes proposed.
Spatial Data - Project spatial data submitted to NFWF's online mapping tool accurately represent the location(s) of conservation activity(ies) at the time of proposal submission. Successful projects will be required to submit improved spatial data for each conservation activity within the period of performance as necessary.
OTHER
Ineligible Uses of Grant Funds
Conservation Easement Eligibility
Environmental Services - NFWF funds projects in pursuit of its mission to sustain, restore and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants and habitats for current and future generations. NFWF recognizes that some benefits from projects may be of value with regards to credits on an environmental services market (such as a carbon credit market). NFWF does not participate in or manage an environmental services market nor does NFWF assert any claim on such credits.
Intellectual Property - Intellectual property created using NFWF awards may be copyrighted or otherwise legally protected by award recipients. NFWF may reserve the right to use, publish, and copy materials created under awards, including posting such material on NFWF's website and featuring it in publications. NFWF may use project metrics and spatial data from awards to estimate societal benefits that result and to report these results to funding partners. These may include but are not limited to habitat and species response, species connectivity, water quality, water quantity, risk of detrimental events (e.g., wildfire, floods), and carbon accounting (e.g., sequestration, avoided emissions).
Procurement - If the applicant chooses to specifically identify proposed Contractor(s) for Services, an award by NFWF to the applicant does not constitute NFWF's express written authorization for the applicant to procure such specific services noncompetitively. When procuring goods and services, NFWF award recipients must follow documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable laws and regulations.
Publicity and Acknowledgment of Support - Award recipients will be required to grant NFWF the right and authority to publicize the project and NFWF's financial support for the grant in press releases, publications and other public communications. Recipients may also be asked by NFWF to provide high-resolution (minimum 300 dpi) photographs depicting the project.
Receiving Award Funds - Award payments are primarily reimbursable. Projects may request funds for reimbursement at any time after completing a signed agreement with NFWF. A request for an advance of funds must be due to an imminent need of expenditure and must detail how the funds will be used and provide justification and a timeline for expected disbursement of these funds. Requests for monthly advances will not be considered.
Compliance Requirements - Projects selected may be subject to requirements under the National Environmental Policy Act, the Endangered Species Act (state and federal), and the National Historic Preservation Act. As may be applicable, successful applicants may be required to comply with additional federal, state or local requirements and obtain all necessary permits and clearances.
HOW TO APPLY
All application materials must be submitted online through National Fish and Wildlife Foundation's Easygrants system.
APPLICATION ASSISTANCE
A Tip Sheet is available for quick reference while you are working through your application. This document can be downloaded here.
Additional information to support the application process can be accessed on the NFWF website's Applicant Information page.
For more information or questions about this RFP, please contact:
Chris West, Director, Rocky Mountain Regional Office: [email protected]
Seth Gallagher, Program Director, Grasslands and Mountain West: [email protected]
Dani Tinnin, Manager, Rocky Mountain Regional Programs: [email protected]
Nora Ong, Manager, Central Region Working Lands: [email protected]
For issues or assistance with our online Easygrants system, please contact:
Easygrants Helpdesk
Email: [email protected]
Voicemail: 202-595-2497
Hours: 9:00 am to 5:00 pm ET, Monday-Friday.
Include: your name, proposal ID #, e-mail address, phone number, program you are applying to, and a description of the issue.