10/18/2024 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 10/18/2024 15:17
Delaware
|
001-14785
|
52-1868008
|
||
(State of incorporation)
|
(Commission File Number)
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
|
6940 Columbia Gateway Dr., Suite 470, Columbia MD, 21046
|
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
|
☐ |
Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
|
☒ |
Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
|
☐ |
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d - 2(b))
|
☐ |
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e - 4 (c))
|
Title of each class
|
Trading Symbol(s)
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
||
Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value
|
GVP
|
The NASDAQ Capital Market
|
Item 8.01. |
Other Events.
|
|
• |
A 1x liquidation preference for the New Senior Convertible Preferred Stock;
|
|
• |
A 7% per annum dividend (payable in cash or PIK);
|
|
• |
The right to appoint designated directors to the Board (which the Company estimated to be at least one third of the pro forma Board);
|
|
• |
Voting rights on an as-converted basis;
|
|
• |
Negative control with respect to certain events including extraordinary transactions, incurrence of indebtedness (other than receivables financing) and the redemption of any capital stock;
|
|
• |
preemptive rights; and
|
|
• |
a put right to force the redemption of the New Senior Convertible Preferred Stock on or after December 31, 2032.
|
|
• |
Tuesday, October 15, 2024, 10 am - The Transaction Committee convened a meeting with representatives of Baird and M&S to assess and evaluate the Revised Proposal. The Transaction Committee identified a number of ambiguities and concerns with the Revised Proposal and directed M&S to request clarification from Company Z including with respect to:
|
|
o |
The proposed terms of the debt facility.
|
|
o |
The requested due diligence period for Company Z to invest $10,000,000 exclusively in GSE Common Stock.
|
|
o |
Whether Company Z had conducted an analysis of the impact of the Revised Proposal on the Company's Federal net operating loss (NOL) carry-forwards in light of recent shifts in GSE Common Stock ownership. See "RISK FACTORS - RISKS RELATED TO OUR FINANCIAL CONDITIONS, ACCOUNTING, AND CONTRACTS" on page 23 of Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2023, filed April 2, 2024.
|
|
o |
Clarification as to why the Revised Proposal suggested that investment could help "grow [the] workforce solutions for the nuclear industry" business line after the Company had begun to winddown operations on August 1, 2024.
|
|
o |
Confirmation that Company Z appreciated that a tender offer would trigger an estimated $1,200,000 redemption option with respect to the Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated June 23, 2023 (the "Lind Warrant"), issued to Lind Global Partners II LP ("Lind").
|
|
o |
Questions regarding permitted uses in light of the Parent Note, Termination Fee, working capital position (which management of the Company estimated would require $3,000,000 to stabilize), the Lind Warrant, and other financial constraints.
|
|
o |
Additional information regarding timing and closing certainty.
|
|
Immediately following the meeting of the Transaction Committee, representative of M&S provided counsel to Company Z the form of confidentiality agreement that GSE had previously provided to Company Z on October 2, 2024. Unlike with regard to the Original Proposal, Counsel to Company Z provided comments to the form of confidentiality agreement later that day.
|
|
• |
Wednesday, October 16, 7:40 am - A representative of M&S, on the instruction of the Transaction Committee, delivered a letter to counsel for Company Z seeking clarification regarding the Revised Proposal. Later that morning, a representative of M&S provided the Company's response to proposed edits to the confidentiality agreement. Later that day, Management of the Company and a representative of M&S met with representatives of Grant Thornton LLP, the Company's income tax advisors, to discuss the possible impact of the Revised Proposal on the Company's NOLs. Representatives of Grant Thornton LLP reviewed with the Company recent shifts in ownership of the Company and provided that a detailed study was required, but that the Revised Proposal risked impairing the Company's NOLs.
|
|
• |
Wednesday, October 16, 2024, 6:16 pm - Counsel to Company Z transmitted responses to the requests for clarification of the Revised Proposal together with a term sheet for a $1,400,000 term loan. The material terms of the proposed term loan were as follows:
|
|
o |
$1,400,000 four-year convertible promissory note;
|
|
a. |
An unusual three-year prepayment prohibition followed by a 2.5% prepayment penalty during the final years of the term;
|
|
b. |
A variable rate of Prime plus 4.5% with a floor of 7%, which would have equaled or exceeded the interest rate on the Parent Note (as defined in the Merger Agreement) at all times during the prior 52-week period;
|
|
c. |
An Original Issue Discount of 1.5%;
|
|
d. |
A monitoring fee" of 0.25% per annum;
|
|
e. |
A newly-imposed minimum liquidity requirement of $1,000,000;
|
|
f. |
A first priority lien on all assets;
|
|
g. |
A right to convert the balance of the term note into GSE Common Stock at any time at the option of the holder;
|
|
h. |
A right to invest up to $10,000,000 in the Company at the option of Company Z; and
|
|
i. |
Undisclosed "customary" covenants, representations, events of default and other terms.
|
|
Company Z further provided that it was willing to invest up to $10,000,000 in GSE Common Stock at $4.50 per share (or as little as $5,000,000) following a still unspecified due diligence period, (though consistent with what the Company found practical and reasonable) but would require designated representation on the Board and a consent right with respect to any co-investors. Company Z provided that it had not conducted due diligence with respect to the Company's NOLs, and that Company Z did not value NOLs because "it has found them difficult to utilize in practice" but acknowledge this would need to be closely monitored. Finally, Company Z acknowledged that it made a mistake with regard to its statement concerning expansion of the Workforce Solutions business line that the Company had begun to winddown on August 1, 2024.
|
|
• |
Thursday, October 17, 2024 - The Board convened a meeting to consider the Revised Proposal together with the foregoing clarifications from Company Z. Following the meeting, a representative of M&S provided further comments to counsel to Company Z regarding the confidentiality agreement.
|
|
• |
Friday, October 18, 2024 - The Company notified Company Z that, in consultation with the Company's legal and financial advisors, the Board did not believe that the Revised Proposal was likely to lead to a Superior Proposal. Consequently, the Company was unable to enter into a confidentiality agreement or provide other information under Section 5.2 of the Merger Agreement.
|
|
• |
Unfavorable Convertible Debt Terms - The terms of the proposed four-year convertible term loan would damage the Company and provide Company Z with effective control over the Company without any meaningful benefit to the Company or its stockholders. First, after paying-off the Parent Note (as defined in the Merger Agreement), the new $1,000,000 minimum liquidity requirement imposed by Company Z, which the Company would not have been able to meet at numerous points in the trailing twelve-month period, would immediately reduce working capital by $1,000,000. Second, the four-year term of the proposed note, combined with three-year prohibition against prepayment, would transfer significant control of the Company to Company Z and prevent the Company from seeking better financing alternatives without making material financial concessions to Company Z. Third, the Board had negotiated superior terms with respect to the Parent Note, which does not mature until August 6, 2025, and the Board believes that the onerous terms of the proposed convertible term loan from Company Z would move the Company backwards toward the terms of the prior Lind convertible note.
|
|
• |
No Liquidity - While approximately 97% of the proxies received by the Company to-date favor the Merger, representing more than a majority of the shares of GSE Common Stock outstanding, the Revised Proposal does not offer meaningful liquidity to GSE stockholders. As the Company provided in its letter to Company Z, the Board believes that, after recapitalizing the business and paying off existing indebtedness, expenses and aged receivables, less than $800,000 would be available to facilitate a self-tender offer and that such lack of liquidity was inconsistent with the desire of the overwhelming majority of stockholders.
|
|
• |
Destructive New Senior Convertible Preferred Stock - The terms of the proposed New Senior Convertible Preferred Stock are not in the best interest of the existing stockholders. The Board did not believe that the premium to the Merger Consideration offered by Company Z for a New Senior Convertible Preferred Stock justified the required liquidation preference, a 7% dividend, transfer of significant Board control without a control premium shared with the holders of GSE Common Stock and the other rights and negative controls associated with the New Senior Convertible Preferred Stock. The Board concluded that such a stock issuance would be adverse to the interests of the holders of GSE Common Stock. Additionally, the Board concluded that creating a second class of stock senior to the GSE Common Stock would not advance the interest of holders of GSE Common Stock and would create an overly complicated capitalization structure that would hinder the performance of the GSE Common Stock.
|
|
• |
The Company's Challenges as a Public Company - The Revised Proposal did not offer any solution for the challenges that the Company has faced and would continue to face as a standalone public company including, but not limited to, finance, audit and compliance costs (which the Company has estimated as at least $2,116,000 per annum), recent difficulties remaining compliant with the NASDAQ listing requirements, inability to obtain performance bonds, regulatory obstacles to providing goods and services in foreign markets, and other challenges that burden the Company with significant expense and at a competitive disadvantage against all of its competitors.
|
|
• |
Lack of Closing Certainty - While Company Z expressed an ability to conduct due diligence in relation to the Common Stock investment in a manner that the Company believes to be reasonable and practical under the circumstances, Company Z did not commit to a specified timeline, has previously rejected the timeline that the Company proposed as reasonable and practical, did not submit a binding proposal to acquire GSE Common Stock (at the stated $4.50 per share or any other amount), and despite the Company's request for substantiation with regard to Company Z's ability to close a transaction, provided vague qualitative statements regarding the size of Company Z's fund. With regard to the convertible note term sheet, Company Z required coercive termination fees tied to its non-binding proposal and other financial obligations should the Company enter into a non-binding term sheet then obtain debt on superior terms from a third party. Finally, Company Z's failure to navigate or appreciate the Company's prior disclosures, including prior disclosure concerning the winddown of the Workforce Solutions business line, suggested to the Board that Company Z had significant remaining due diligence to pursue.
|
|
• |
Dilution of Existing Stockholders at a Modest Premium - If the non-binding investment of $10,000,000 in GSE Common Stock were to materialize, it would be (at best) a modest premium to the Merger Consideration (as defined in the Merger Agreement) and market price of the GSE Common Stock, and did not justify the significant dilution of the existing stockholders.
|
|
• |
Potential Adverse Tax Consequences - Unlike Company Z's experience, the Company has benefited from its NOLs and routinely tested shifts in share ownership to ensure the availability of the same. On the advice of its tax and legal advisors, the Board believes that an investment of $5,000,000-$10,000,000 by Company Z in GSE Common Stock may impair the Company's NOLs and adversely impact the tax position of the Company. Company Z's perspective that NOLs are not valuable assets also suggested to the Board that Company Z intended to take a short-term approach, which was fundamentally inconsistent with the Board's view that long-term prospects of the nuclear industry may be strong, but that short-term customer spending remained slow and the current environment would remain challenging for the Company for the foreseeable future.
|
GSE SYSTEMS, INC.
|
|
Date: October 18, 2024
|
/s/ Emmett Pepe
|
Emmett Pepe
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|