|
Question ID # (2022)
|
Question ID # (2023)
|
Question ID # (2024)
|
Question ID # (2025)
|
Topic
|
Line Item
|
Units
|
2022
|
2023
|
2024
|
2025
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
Governance and Economic Dimensions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 - The total generation output, MWh, reflects the aggregated net output of the PSEG Power generation portfolio. For 2023-2025, the reported generation output only includes the nuclear plants. For 2022, the reported generation output reflects the nuclear power plants, the prorated output from PSEG Fossil before the completion of the sale, the Kalaeloa Cogeneration Plant in Hawaii and PSEG Solar4All.
|
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
Denominator - MWh/Revenues1
|
Company Data: MWh
|
MWh
|
33,993,224
|
31,541,000
|
30,630,000
|
30,920,000
|
|
|
2 - Data only includes violations as defined in the S&P CSA (fine/penalty that individually costs more than $10,000 USD).
|
|
1.6.1
|
1.6.1
|
1.6.1
|
1.6.1
|
Contributions & Other Spending
|
Lobbying, interest representation or similar
|
$
|
3,379,112
|
3,026,233
|
3,400,501
|
2,683,000
|
|
|
3 - Total reported Scope 3 reflects the sum of Category 3 and Category 11 emissions in mt CO2e, excluding third-party supply. Only Categories 3 and 11 are reported since they make up more than 95% of our Scope 3 emissions. Reported Scope 3 emissions data does not include PSEG LI.
|
|
1.6.1
|
1.6.1
|
1.6.1
|
1.6.1
|
Contributions & Other Spending
|
Local, regional or national political campaigns / organizations / candidates
|
$
|
207,000
|
631,000
|
460,000
|
520,000
|
|
|
4 - Upstream emissions related to sourcing of fuels for power generation, sourcing of fuels for mobile and small combustion, purchased electricity for own use, electricity purchased and sold to customers (BGS only), and natural gas owned by PSEG (BGSS). Reported Scope 3 emissions data does not include PSEG LI.
|
|
1.6.1
|
1.6.1
|
1.6.1
|
1.6.1
|
Contributions & Other Spending
|
Trade associations or tax-exempt groups (e.g. think tanks)
|
$
|
5,603,747
|
2,607,608
|
5,134,696
|
5,517,746
|
|
|
5 - Downstream emissons from use of sold products, excluding third-party supply. Reported Scope 3 emissions data does not include PSEG LI.
|
|
1.6.1
|
1.6.1
|
1.6.1
|
1.6.1
|
Contributions & Other Spending
|
Other (e.g. spending related to ballot measures or referendums)
|
$
|
71,800
|
8,300
|
149,500
|
74,400
|
|
|
6 - SF6 emissions for 2024 updated from 0.53 to 1.05. Reported SF6 emissions data does not include PSEG LI.
|
|
Environmental Dimension
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 - The amount of renewable energy consumed is calculated based on the share of renewable resources on the PJM system for the corresponding year multiplied by the volume of PSEG corporate consumption (6.6%, "PJM State of the Market - 2025"). Reported energy consumption data does not include PSEG LI.
|
|
2.1.4
|
2.1.4
|
2.1.3
|
2.1.3
|
Environmental Violations2
|
Number of violations of legal obligations/regulations
|
#
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
|
8 - In 2022, the calculation for line losses was revisited and an aggregate T&D loss was calculated. The aggregate T&D loss % represents the system losses as a percentage of the power flows that entered our network versus the power that reached our customers. Reported T&D loss % does not include PSEG LI.
|
|
2.1.4
|
2.1.4
|
2.1.3
|
2.1.3
|
Environmental Violations2
|
Amount of fines/penalties related to above
|
$
|
28,988
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
|
9 - The sale of the 6,750 MW PSEG Fossil generation portfolio was completed in mid-February 2022. In accordance with the parameters of the question, the waste associated with those facilities is not included in our reporting.
|
|
2.1.4
|
2.1.4
|
2.1.3
|
2.1.3
|
Environmental Violations2
|
Environmental liability accrued at end of year.
|
$
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
|
10 - Metrics reflect changes in DJSI CSA methodology from prior years. See 2.5.1 for data prior to 2023. The 2023-2025 reported data includes the PSEG nuclear plants. The 2022 repored data includes approximately two months for the 6,750 MW PSEG Fossil generation portfolio before the asset divestiture was completed, the Kaleoloa Cogeneration Plant and the PSEG nuclear plants.
|
|
2.2.3
|
2.5.3
|
2.5.3
|
2.5.3
|
Indirect Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Scope 3)3
|
Total indirect GHG emissions (Scope 3
|
mt CO2e
|
26,012,278
|
|
21,202,713
|
22,930,925
|
|
|
11 - The reported non-renewable and renewable purchased electricity is based on the wholesale power purchases reported on FERC Form 1, adjusted for the share of system energy defined as renewable by PJM Interconnection during the corresponding period (6.6%, "PJM State of the Market - 2025"). Reported nuclear generation output for 2023 was updated from 31,599 to 31,541.
|
|
2.2.3
|
2.5.3
|
2.5.3
|
2.5.3
|
Indirect Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Scope 3)4
|
3. Fuel-and-energy-related-activities (not included in Scope 1 or 2)
|
mt CO2e
|
15,634,344
|
|
11,557,436
|
12,034,072
|
|
|
12 - The carbon intensity reflects the GHG emissions from the PSEG Power owned-generation plants divided by the total net generation output. From 2023-2025, only PSEG Power's nucelar plants are included.
|
|
2.2.3
|
2.5.3
|
2.5.3
|
2.5.3
|
Indirect Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Scope 3)5
|
11. Use of sold products
|
mt CO2e
|
10,377,934
|
|
9,645,277
|
10,896,853
|
|
|
13 - Calculation includes both external and internal hires.
|
|
2.2.8
|
2.5.4
|
2.5.4
|
2.5.4
|
SF6 Emissions6
|
SF6 Emissions
|
mt
|
1.01
|
0.43
|
1.05
|
0.56
|
|
|
14 - In 2025, JD Power redesigned the customer satisfaction index to evaluate performance across eight core dimensions. These dimensions represent the entire customer experience. Rating scale moveo from 10-point to 6-point to compute the overall index for the electric utility companies included in the study.
|
|
2.3.1
|
2.2.2
|
2.2.2
|
2.2.2
|
Energy Consumption
|
Total non-renewable energy consumption
|
MWh
|
6,188,548
|
93,074
|
84,625
|
91,256
|
|
|
15 - The reported reliability data does not include PSEG LI.
|
|
2.3.1
|
2.2.2
|
2.2.2
|
2.2.2
|
Energy Consumption7
|
Total renewable energy consumption
|
MWh
|
3,198
|
3,095
|
2,808
|
2,934
|
|
|
16 - The reported waste data does not include PSEG LI.
|
|
2.3.3
|
2.7.1
|
2.7.2
|
2.7.3
|
Electricity Transmission & Distribution Losses8
|
Transmission Losses
|
%
|
|
2.3.3
|
2.7.1
|
2.7.2
|
2.7.3
|
Electricity Transmission & Distribution Losses8
|
Distribution Losses
|
%
|
5.665
|
5.25
|
5.1
|
5.27
|
|
2.3.4
|
2.7.2
|
2.7.3
|
2.7.4
|
Electricity Transmission & Distribution Reliability15
|
SAIDI (in hours) Distribution Network
|
Hours
|
0.55
|
0.63
|
0.62
|
0.70
|
|
2.3.5
|
2.7.3
|
2.7.4
|
2.7.5
|
Gas Leakage Rate
|
Distribution Rate
|
(% leakages)
|
1.48
|
1.75
|
1.23
|
1.58
|
|
2.4.1
|
2.3.2
|
2.3.2
|
2.3.2
|
Waste Disposal16
|
Total Waste Recycled/Reused
|
mt
|
580,135
|
802,384
|
458,152
|
472,867
|
|
2.4.1
|
2.3.2
|
2.3.2
|
2.3.2
|
Waste Disposal16
|
Total Waste Disposed
|
mt
|
51,177
|
78,767
|
77,016
|
51,985
|
|
2.4.1
|
2.3.2
|
2.3.2
|
2.3.2
|
Waste Disposal16
|
Waste Disposed - landfilled
|
mt
|
20,003
|
22,279
|
35,137
|
18,596
|
|
2.4.1
|
2.3.2
|
2.3.2
|
2.3.2
|
Waste Disposal16
|
Waste Disposed - incinerated with energy recovery
|
mt
|
364
|
156
|
1,041
|
489
|
|
2.4.1
|
2.3.2
|
2.3.2
|
2.3.2
|
Waste Disposal16
|
Waste Disposed - incinerated without energy recovery
|
mt
|
124
|
290
|
158
|
95
|
|
2.4.1
|
2.3.2
|
2.3.2
|
2.3.2
|
Waste Disposal16
|
Waste Disposed - otherwise disposed (waste water treatment)
|
mt
|
30,090
|
56,042
|
40,680
|
31,076
|
|
2.4.2
|
2.3.3
|
2.3.3
|
2.3.3
|
Hazardous Waste16
|
Total hazardous waste recycled/reused
|
mt
|
2.0
|
0.8
|
1.0
|
0.6
|
|
2.4.2
|
2.3.3
|
2.3.3
|
2.3.3
|
Hazardous Waste16
|
Total hazardous waste disposed
|
mt
|
1,436
|
2,121
|
1,834
|
1,729
|
|
2.4.2
|
2.3.3
|
2.3.3
|
2.3.3
|
Hazardous Waste16
|
Hazardous waste - landfilled
|
mt
|
1,413
|
2,106
|
1,817
|
1,717
|
|
2.4.2
|
2.3.3
|
2.3.3
|
2.3.3
|
Hazardous Waste16
|
Hazardous waste - incinerated with energy recovery
|
mt
|
9
|
10
|
5
|
10
|
|
2.4.2
|
2.3.3
|
2.3.3
|
2.3.3
|
Hazardous Waste16
|
Hazardous waste - incinerated without energy recovery
|
mt
|
8
|
5
|
12
|
2
|
|
2.4.2
|
2.3.3
|
2.3.3
|
2.3.3
|
Hazardous Waste16
|
Hazardous waste - otherwise disposed (waste water treatment)
|
mt
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
2.4.3
|
2.3.4
|
2.3.4
|
2.3.4
|
Ash & Gypsum Waste9
|
Total ash and gypsum waste recycled/reused
|
mt
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
2.4.3
|
2.3.4
|
2.3.4
|
2.3.4
|
Ash & Gypsum Waste9
|
Total ash and gypsum waste disposed
|
mt
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
2.5.1
|
n/a
|
|
|
Water Consumption10
|
Withdrawal: Total municipal water (or from other water utilities)
|
MM m3
|
1.1
|
|
2.5.1
|
n/a
|
|
|
Water Consumption10
|
Withdrawal: Fresh surface water (lakes, rivers, etc.)
|
MM m3
|
0.5
|
|
2.5.1
|
n/a
|
|
|
Water Consumption10
|
Withdrawal: Fresh groundwater
|
MM m3
|
1.0
|
|
2.5.1
|
n/a
|
|
|
Water Consumption10
|
Discharge: Water returned to the source of extraction at similar or higher quality as raw water extracted (only applies to B and C)
|
MM m3
|
0.1
|
|
2.5.1
|
n/a
|
|
|
Water Consumption10
|
E. TOTAL NET FRESH WATER CONSUMPTION (A+B+C-D)
|
MM m3
|
2.5
|
|
2.4.2
|
2.4.2
|
2.4.2
|
2.4.2
|
Water Consumption10
|
Withdrawal Total (excluding salt water)
|
|
|
1.1
|
1.1
|
1.1
|
|
2.4.2
|
2.4.2
|
2.4.2
|
2.4.2
|
Water Consumption10
|
Discharge Total (excluding salt water)
|
|
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
|
2.4.2
|
2.4.2
|
2.4.2
|
2.4.2
|
Water Consumption10
|
Total Net Fresh Water (A-B)
|
|
|
1.1
|
1.1
|
1.1
|
|
2.7.4
|
2.6.4
|
2.6.4
|
2.6.4
|
Biodiversity Exposure & Assessment
|
Total number of sites used for operational activities
|
#
|
481
|
481
|
481
|
481
|
|
2.7.4
|
2.6.4
|
2.6.4
|
2.6.4
|
Biodiversity Exposure & Assessment
|
Total area used for operational activities
|
hectares
|
8,434
|
8,434
|
8,434
|
8,434
|
|
2.7.4
|
2.6.4
|
2.6.4
|
2.6.4
|
Biodiversity Exposure & Assessment
|
Conducted biodiversity impact assessments for sites used for operational activities in the past five years
|
#
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
2.7.4
|
2.6.4
|
2.6.4
|
2.6.4
|
Biodiversity Exposure & Assessment
|
Conducted biodiversity impact assessments for area used for operational activities in the past five years
|
hectares
|
6,890
|
6,890
|
6,890
|
6,890
|
|
2.7.4
|
2.6.4
|
2.6.4
|
2.6.4
|
Biodiversity Exposure & Assessment
|
Of sites assess in past five years, how many sites are in close proximity to critical biodiversity
|
#
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
2.7.4
|
2.6.4
|
2.6.4
|
2.6.4
|
Biodiversity Exposure & Assessment
|
Of sites assess in past five years, what is total area in close proximity to critical biodiversity
|
hectares
|
1,787
|
1,787
|
1,787
|
1,787
|
|
2.7.4
|
2.6.4
|
2.6.4
|
2.6.4
|
Biodiversity Exposure & Assessment
|
Of sites in close proximity to critical biodiversity, number of sites with a biodiversity management plan
|
#
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
2.7.4
|
2.6.4
|
2.6.4
|
2.6.4
|
Biodiversity Exposure & Assessment
|
Of sites in close proximity to critical biodiversity, area covered by biodiversity management plans
|
hectares
|
6,890
|
6,890
|
6,890
|
6,890
|
|
2.8.1
|
2.7.4
|
2.7.5
|
2.7.6
|
Electricity Generation Mix
|
Non-renewable energy sources (net generation): Coal
|
GWh
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
2.8.1
|
2.7.4
|
2.7.5
|
2.7.6
|
Electricity Generation Mix11
|
Non-renewable energy sources (net generation): Nuclear
|
GWh
|
31,265
|
31,541
|
30,630
|
30,920
|
|
2.8.1
|
2.7.4
|
2.7.5
|
2.7.6
|
Electricity Generation Mix
|
Non-renewable energy sources (net generation): Natural Gas
|
GWh
|
2,119
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
2.8.1
|
2.7.4
|
2.7.5
|
2.7.6
|
Electricity Generation Mix
|
Non-renewable energy sources (net generation): Oil
|
GWh
|
609
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
2.8.1
|
2.7.4
|
2.7.5
|
2.7.6
|
Electricity Generation Mix11
|
Electricity from non-renewable energy sources purchased from third-parties and sold
|
GWh
|
23,933
|
23,635
|
23,422
|
23,075
|
|
2.8.1
|
2.7.4
|
2.7.5
|
2.7.6
|
Electricity Generation Mix
|
Renewable energy sources (net generation): Solar
|
GWh
|
182
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
2.8.1
|
2.7.4
|
2.7.5
|
2.7.6
|
Electricity Generation Mix11
|
Electricity from renewable energy sources purchased from third-parties and sold
|
GWh
|
1,548
|
1,535
|
1,442
|
1,631
|
|
2.8.1
|
2.7.4
|
2.7.5
|
2.7.6
|
Electricity Generation Mix12
|
Company's average carbon intensity in terms of metric tons of CO2 equivalent per GWh generated
|
mtCO2e/GWh
|
38.37
|
0.19
|
0.18
|
0.23
|
|
Social Dimension
|
|
3.1.2
|
3.1.2
|
3.1.4
|
3.1.4
|
Workforce Breakdown: Gender
|
Share of women in total workforce
|
% of total workforce
|
18
|
18
|
19
|
19
|
|
3.1.2
|
3.1.2
|
3.1.4
|
3.1.4
|
Workforce Breakdown: Gender
|
Share of women in all management positions, including junior, middle and top management
|
as % of total management positions
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
3.1.2
|
3.1.2
|
3.1.4
|
3.1.4
|
Workforce Breakdown: Gender
|
Share of women in top management positions, i.e. maximum two levels away from the CEO or comparable positions
|
as % of total top management positions
|
26
|
25
|
26
|
31
|
|
3.1.2
|
3.1.2
|
3.1.4
|
3.1.4
|
Workforce Breakdown: Gender
|
Share of women in management positions in revenue-generating functions
|
% of all such managers (i.e. excluding support functions such as HR, IT, Legal, etc.)
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
3.1.3
|
3.1.3
|
3.1.5
|
3.1.5
|
Workforce Breakdown: Race/Ethnicity & Nationality
|
Asian: Share in total workforce
|
as % of total workforce
|
5
|
5
|
6
|
6
|
|
3.1.3
|
3.1.3
|
3.1.5
|
3.1.5
|
Workforce Breakdown: Race/Ethnicity & Nationality
|
Asian: Share in all management positions, including junior, middle, and senior management
|
as % of total management workforce
|
6
|
7
|
7
|
8
|
|
3.1.3
|
3.1.3
|
3.1.5
|
3.1.5
|
Workforce Breakdown: Race/Ethnicity & Nationality
|
Black or African American: Share in total workforce
|
as % of total workforce
|
12
|
12
|
12
|
12
|
|
3.1.3
|
3.1.3
|
3.1.5
|
3.1.5
|
Workforce Breakdown: Race/Ethnicity & Nationality
|
Black or African American: Share in all management positions, including junior, middle, and senior management
|
as % of total management workforce
|
9
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
|
3.1.3
|
3.1.3
|
3.1.5
|
3.1.5
|
Workforce Breakdown: Race/Ethnicity & Nationality
|
Hispanic or Latino: Share in total workforce
|
as % of total workforce
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
|
3.1.3
|
3.1.3
|
3.1.5
|
3.1.5
|
Workforce Breakdown: Race/Ethnicity & Nationality
|
Hispanic or Latino: Share in all management positions, including junior, middle, and senior management
|
as % of total management workforce
|
6
|
7
|
7
|
7
|
|
3.1.3
|
3.1.3
|
3.1.5
|
3.1.5
|
Workforce Breakdown: Race/Ethnicity & Nationality
|
White: Share in total workforce
|
as % of total workforce
|
72
|
71
|
70
|
69
|
|
3.1.3
|
3.1.3
|
3.1.5
|
3.1.5
|
Workforce Breakdown: Race/Ethnicity & Nationality
|
White: Share in all management positions, including junior, middle, and senior management
|
as % of total management workforce
|
77
|
75
|
74
|
73
|
|
3.1.3
|
3.1.3
|
3.1.5
|
3.1.5
|
Workforce Breakdown: Race/Ethnicity & Nationality
|
Indigenous or Native: Share in total workforce
|
as % of total workforce
|
0.3
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
|
3.1.3
|
3.1.3
|
3.1.5
|
3.1.5
|
Workforce Breakdown: Race/Ethnicity & Nationality
|
Indigenous or Native: Share in all management positions, including junior, middle, and senior management
|
as % of total management workforce
|
0.4
|
0.1
|
0.2
|
0.1
|
|
3.1.3
|
3.1.3
|
3.1.5
|
3.1.5
|
Workforce Breakdown: Race/Ethnicity & Nationality
|
Other (two or more races): Share in total workforce
|
as % of total workforce
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
|
3.1.3
|
3.1.3
|
3.1.5
|
3.1.5
|
Workforce Breakdown: Race/Ethnicity & Nationality
|
Other (two or more races): Share in all management positions, including junior, middle, and senior management
|
as % of total management workforce
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|
3.3.1
|
3.3.1
|
3.3.1
|
3.3.1
|
Training & Development Inputs
|
Average hours per FTE of training and development
|
Hours
|
50
|
85
|
122
|
194
|
|
3.3.3
|
3.3.3
|
3.3.3
|
3.3.3
|
Human Capital Return on Investment
|
a.) Total Revenue
|
$MM
|
9,800
|
11,237
|
10,290
|
12,168
|
|
3.3.3
|
3.3.3
|
3.3.3
|
3.3.3
|
Human Capital Return on Investment
|
b.) Total Operating Expenses
|
$MM
|
8,419
|
7,552
|
7,937
|
9,188
|
|
3.3.3
|
3.3.3
|
3.3.3
|
3.3.3
|
Human Capital Return on Investment
|
c.) Total employee-related expenses
|
$MM
|
2,073
|
2,052
|
2,193
|
2,245
|
|
3.4.1
|
3.3.4
|
3.3.4
|
3.3.4
|
Hiring13
|
Total number of new employee hires
|
#
|
2,264
|
1,699
|
2,019
|
1,539
|
|
3.4.1
|
3.3.4
|
3.3.4
|
3.3.4
|
Hiring
|
Percentage of open positions filled by internal candidates (internal hires)
|
%
|
27
|
30
|
28
|
25
|
|
3.5.3
|
3.4.3
|
3.4.3
|
3.4.3
|
Fatalities
|
Employees
|
#
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
3.5.3
|
3.4.3
|
3.4.3
|
3.4.3
|
Fatalities
|
Contractors
|
#
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
3.5.4
|
3.4.4
|
3.4.4
|
3.4.4
|
Lost-Time Injury Frequency Rate (LTIR) - Employees
|
Lost-Time Injury Rate (LTIR)
|
LTIR (n/200,000 hours worked)
|
0.39
|
0.20
|
0.30
|
0.18
|
|
3.5.5
|
3.4.5
|
3.4.5
|
3.4.5
|
Lost-Time Injury Frequency Rate (LTIR) - Contractors
|
Lost-Time Injury Rate (LTIR)
|
LTIR (n/200,000 hours worked)
|
0.13
|
0.46
|
0.37
|
0.29
|
|
3.6.1
|
3.5.1
|
3.5.1
|
3.5.2
|
Customer Satisfaction Measurement14
|
Alternative Metric: JD Power Utility Customer Survey
|
Scale: 0-1000
|
767
|
759
|
746
|
529
|