Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion and analysis relates to the Bank's financial condition as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. This section explains the changes in certain key items in the Bank's financial statements from year to year, the primary factors driving those changes, the Bank's risk management processes and results, known trends or uncertainties that the Bank believes may have a material effect on the Bank's future performance, as well as how certain accounting principles affect the Bank's financial statements. For a discussion on the comparison between
the results of operations for the years ended 2024 and 2023, see the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, which are contained in the Bank's 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on March 7, 2025.
This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Bank's audited financial statements and related notes for the year ended December 31, 2025 included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Dataof this Report. Readers also should carefully review "Special Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-looking Statements"and Item 1A. Risk Factors, for a description of the forward-looking statements in this Report and a discussion of the factors that might cause the Bank's actual results to differ, perhaps materially, from these forward-looking statements.
Executive Summary
Business Overview
The Bank's business model is focused on enhancing the total value of the cooperative for its members by serving as their trusted advisor. The Bank is focused on providing value to members by delivering solutions that meet their needs and the communities they serve by enhancing the availability of residential mortgage and community investment credit. The Bank focuses these efforts on offering readily available, competitively priced advances, a potential return on investment, support for community investment activities, and other credit and noncredit products and services. As part of the Bank's cooperative structure, the Bank has chosen to operate with narrow margins, passing on its low funding costs to members, which causes the Bank's profitability to be sensitive to changes in market conditions.
The state of the economy and the Bank's regulatory environment are significant components in determining the Bank's overall business outlook as they impact advance demand, asset and collateral values, member financial stability, funding costs, and many other facets of the Bank's operations. External factors such as liquidity levels at member institutions, fiscal and monetary policies, performance of global economies, and regulatory changes could have a significant effect either positive or negative on the Bank's financial performance.
Interest rates are also a significant factor in the Bank's business outlook. Changes in interest rates can impact the Bank's interest rate risk management, profitability, and return on equity (ROE). They can also impact member advance demand, as rate uncertainty can impact deposit levels at the Bank's members.
Merger activity involving the Bank's members can impact the Bank's business outlook. As the financial industry continues to experience consolidation, the Bank's membership base may decrease, and the Bank's advance balance and other business could increase or decrease significantly depending upon the size of the financial institutions involved in the merger. While the Bank's balance sheet is designed to expand and contract based upon advance demand, the Bank is vulnerable to member concentration, as such, the Bank's business could be affected by this merger activity, including as a result of a single event causing the loss of a member's business due to acquisition by a non-member.
Financial Condition
The following table presents the Bank's total assets, total liabilities, and total capital (dollars in millions). These items are discussed in more detail below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2025
|
|
2024
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
|
|
Total assets
|
$
|
146,236
|
|
|
$
|
147,091
|
|
|
$
|
(855)
|
|
|
(0.58)
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
137,615
|
|
|
139,158
|
|
|
(1,543)
|
|
|
(1.11)
|
|
|
Total capital
|
8,621
|
|
|
7,933
|
|
|
688
|
|
|
8.67
|
|
•Total assets remained relatively stable compared to December 31, 2024. Advances increased by $9.1 billion, or 10.7 percent, which was offset by a $10.0 billion, or 16.7 percent, decrease in total investments.
•Total liabilities remained relatively stable compared to December 31, 2024.
•Total capital increased primarily due to a $459 million, or 8.93 percent, increase in capital stock primarily due to an increase in advances and a $209 million, or 7.46 percent, increase in retained earnings.
Results of Operations
The following table presents the Bank's significant income and expense items for the years presented and provides information regarding the changes during those years (dollars in millions). These items are discussed in more detail below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2025 vs. 2024
|
|
2024 vs. 2023
|
|
|
2025
|
|
2024
|
|
2023
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
|
|
Net interest income
|
$
|
857
|
|
|
$
|
966
|
|
|
$
|
889
|
|
|
$
|
(109)
|
|
|
(11.29)
|
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
8.57
|
|
|
Non-interest income
|
28
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
20.62
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
343.24
|
|
|
Non-interest expense
|
216
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
0.49
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
23.47
|
|
|
Affordable Housing Program assessment
|
67
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
(10)
|
|
|
(13.59)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
7.38
|
|
|
Net income
|
$
|
602
|
|
|
$
|
697
|
|
|
$
|
649
|
|
|
$
|
(95)
|
|
|
(13.61)
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
7.38
|
|
•The decrease in net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to the same period in 2024 was primarily due to lower interest rates, which impacted income from interest-earning assets more than the expense from interest-bearing liabilities. The impact was partially offset by an increase in average advance and investment balances.
•Average advance balances increased to $100.7 billion for the year ended December 31, 2025, from $98.8 billion for the year ended December 31, 2024.
•The decrease in net income for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to the same period in 2024 was primarily due to the $109 million decrease in net interest income.
The following table presents the Bank's significant income ratios for the years presented. These items are discussed in more detail below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2025
|
|
2024
|
|
2023
|
|
2025 vs. 2024
|
|
2024 vs. 2023
|
|
ROE
|
|
6.90
|
%
|
|
8.31
|
%
|
|
7.43
|
%
|
|
(1.41)
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
|
Average daily SOFR
|
|
4.24
|
|
|
5.15
|
|
|
5.01
|
|
|
(0.91)
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
ROE spread to average daily SOFR
|
|
2.66
|
|
|
3.16
|
|
|
2.42
|
|
|
(0.50)
|
|
|
0.74
|
|
|
Net yield on interest-earning assets
|
|
0.55
|
|
|
0.64
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
|
(0.09)
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
•The decrease in the ROE for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to the same period in 2024, was primarily due to a decrease in net income and increase in average total capital outstanding.
Financial Condition
The following table presents the distribution of the Bank's total assets, liabilities, and capital (dollars in millions). These items are discussed in more detail below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025
|
|
2024
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
of Total
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
of Total
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
|
|
Advances
|
$
|
94,978
|
|
|
64.95
|
|
|
$
|
85,829
|
|
|
58.35
|
|
|
$
|
9,149
|
|
|
10.66
|
|
|
Investment securities
|
33,591
|
|
|
22.97
|
|
|
30,233
|
|
|
20.55
|
|
|
3,358
|
|
|
11.11
|
|
|
Other investments
|
16,458
|
|
|
11.26
|
|
|
29,851
|
|
|
20.30
|
|
|
(13,393)
|
|
|
(44.87)
|
|
|
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net
|
77
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
(12)
|
|
|
(13.45)
|
|
|
Other assets
|
1,132
|
|
|
0.77
|
|
|
1,089
|
|
|
0.74
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
3.98
|
|
|
Total assets
|
$
|
146,236
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
147,091
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
(855)
|
|
|
(0.58)
|
|
|
Consolidated obligations, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount notes
|
$
|
44,390
|
|
|
32.26
|
|
|
$
|
32,152
|
|
|
23.10
|
|
|
$
|
12,238
|
|
|
38.06
|
|
|
Bonds
|
89,251
|
|
|
64.85
|
|
|
103,699
|
|
|
74.52
|
|
|
(14,448)
|
|
|
(13.93)
|
|
|
Total consolidated obligations, net
|
133,641
|
|
|
97.11
|
|
|
135,851
|
|
|
97.62
|
|
|
(2,210)
|
|
|
(1.63)
|
|
|
Deposits
|
2,463
|
|
|
1.79
|
|
|
2,312
|
|
|
1.66
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
6.55
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
1,511
|
|
|
1.10
|
|
|
995
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
51.91
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
$
|
137,615
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
139,158
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
(1,543)
|
|
|
(1.11)
|
|
|
Capital stock
|
$
|
5,607
|
|
|
65.05
|
|
|
$
|
5,148
|
|
|
64.90
|
|
|
$
|
459
|
|
|
8.93
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
2,994
|
|
|
34.72
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
|
35.11
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
7.46
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
20
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(0.01)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
*
|
|
Total capital
|
$
|
8,621
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
7,933
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
688
|
|
|
8.67
|
|
_________
* Not meaningful
Advances
The following table presents the Bank's advances outstanding by year of maturity and the related weighted-average interest rate (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
2025
|
|
2024
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Weighted-average Interest Rate (%)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Weighted-average Interest Rate (%)
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
$
|
67,939
|
|
|
4.01
|
|
|
$
|
59,497
|
|
|
4.64
|
|
|
Due after one year through two years
|
13,298
|
|
|
3.91
|
|
|
9,155
|
|
|
4.28
|
|
|
Due after two years through three years
|
5,938
|
|
|
3.81
|
|
|
4,768
|
|
|
4.08
|
|
|
Due after three years through four years
|
3,002
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
5,327
|
|
|
3.90
|
|
|
Due after four years through five years
|
1,920
|
|
|
3.57
|
|
|
2,730
|
|
|
4.04
|
|
|
Due after five years through 15 years
|
2,998
|
|
|
3.29
|
|
|
4,527
|
|
|
3.84
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
4
|
|
|
2.81
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
5.07
|
|
|
Total par value
|
95,099
|
|
|
3.95
|
|
|
86,308
|
|
|
4.47
|
|
|
Deferred prepayment fees
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
Discounts
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value hedging adjustments
|
(119)
|
|
|
|
|
(481)
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
$
|
94,978
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
85,829
|
|
|
|
Total advances increased by 10.7 percent as of December 31, 2025, compared to December 31, 2024. A significant percentage of advances originated during 2025 and 2024 were short-term advances.
As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, 35.1 percent and 42.6 percent, respectively, of the Bank's advances were fixed rate. However, the Bank often simultaneously entered into derivatives with the issuance of advances to convert the rates, in effect, into short-term variable interest rates, primarily based on SOFR. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, 67.9 percent and 68.3 percent, respectively, of the Bank's fixed-rate advances were swapped. SOFR-indexed and OIS-indexed advances comprised 78.8 percent and 19.5 percent, respectively of the Bank's variable-rate advances as of December 31, 2025. The Bank also offers variable-rate advances that may be tied to indices, such as the federal funds rate, prime rate, or constant maturity swap rates.
The Bank's 10 largest borrowing member institutions had 72.3 percent of the Bank's total advances outstanding as of December 31, 2025. Further information regarding the Bank's 10 largest borrowing member institutions and breakdown of their individual advance balances as of December 31, 2025 is contained in Item 1. Business-Credit Products-Advances. The Bank monitors concentration risk and believes it holds sufficient collateral, on a member-specific basis, to secure the advances to all borrowers, including these 10 institutions, and the Bank does not expect to incur any credit losses on these advances.
Investments
The following table presents more detailed information regarding investments held by the Bank (dollars in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2025
|
|
2024
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
Due after five through 10 years
|
|
Due after 10 years
|
|
Total
|
|
Amount
|
|
Percent
|
|
Investment securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury obligations
|
$
|
1,230
|
|
|
$
|
4,364
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
5,594
|
|
|
$
|
4,063
|
|
|
$
|
1,531
|
|
|
37.70
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprises commercial
|
-
|
|
|
884
|
|
|
2,103
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
3,339
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
2,612
|
|
|
359.35
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities
|
1,230
|
|
|
5,248
|
|
|
2,103
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
8,933
|
|
|
4,790
|
|
|
4,143
|
|
|
86.51
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State or local housing agency debt obligations
|
1
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprises debt obligations
|
100
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
795
|
|
|
(435)
|
|
|
(54.72)
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. agency obligations-guaranteed residential
|
-
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,875
|
|
|
1,876
|
|
|
2,010
|
|
|
(134)
|
|
|
(6.66)
|
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprises residential
|
-
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
10,452
|
|
|
10,559
|
|
|
8,420
|
|
|
2,139
|
|
|
25.40
|
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprises commercial
|
281
|
|
|
5,646
|
|
|
5,530
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
11,862
|
|
|
14,217
|
|
|
(2,355)
|
|
|
(16.56)
|
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities
|
281
|
|
|
5,650
|
|
|
5,634
|
|
|
12,732
|
|
|
24,297
|
|
|
24,647
|
|
|
(350)
|
|
|
(1.42)
|
|
|
Total held-to-maturity securities
|
382
|
|
|
5,850
|
|
|
5,694
|
|
|
12,732
|
|
|
24,658
|
|
|
25,443
|
|
|
(785)
|
|
|
(3.09)
|
|
|
Total investment securities
|
1,612
|
|
|
11,098
|
|
|
7,797
|
|
|
13,084
|
|
|
33,591
|
|
|
30,233
|
|
|
3,358
|
|
|
11.11
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
2,551
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
2,551
|
|
|
1,493
|
|
|
1,058
|
|
|
70.85
|
|
|
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
|
5,500
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
5,500
|
|
|
21,200
|
|
|
(15,700)
|
|
|
(74.06)
|
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
8,407
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
8,407
|
|
|
7,158
|
|
|
1,249
|
|
|
17.45
|
|
|
Total other investments
|
16,458
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
16,458
|
|
|
29,851
|
|
|
(13,393)
|
|
|
(44.87)
|
|
|
Total investments
|
$
|
18,070
|
|
|
$
|
11,098
|
|
|
$
|
7,797
|
|
|
$
|
13,084
|
|
|
$
|
50,049
|
|
|
$
|
60,084
|
|
|
$
|
(10,035)
|
|
|
(16.70)
|
|
|
Weighted-average yields on (1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities
|
4.80
|
%
|
|
4.16
|
%
|
|
4.73
|
%
|
|
4.44
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity securities
|
4.60
|
%
|
|
4.18
|
%
|
|
4.54
|
%
|
|
4.63
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_________
(1)The weighted-average yields on available-for-sale securities and held-to-maturity securities are calculated as the sum of each debt security using the period- end balances multiplied by the coupon rate adjusted by the impact of amortization and accretion of premiums and discounts, divided by the total debt securities in the applicable available-for-sale securities and held-to-maturity securities portfolio.
The FHFA regulations prohibit an FHLBank from purchasing MBS and asset-backed securities if its investment in such securities would exceed 300 percent of the FHLBank's previous month-end regulatory capital on the day it would purchase the securities. As of December 31, 2025, these investments were 321 percent of the Bank's regulatory capital. The Bank was in
compliance with this regulatory requirement at the time of its MBS purchases and is not required to sell any previously purchased MBS. However, the Bank is precluded from purchasing additional MBS until its MBS to regulatory capital declines below 300 percent.
The amount held in other investments varies each day based on the Bank's liquidity needs as a result of advances demand, the earnings rates, and the availability of high-quality counterparties in the federal funds market.
Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio
The Bank purchased fixed-rate residential mortgage loans directly from PFIs and through participation in eligible mortgage loans from other FHLBanks. The decrease in mortgage loans held for portfolio from December 31, 2024 to December 31, 2025 was primarily due to the maturity and prepayments of these assets during the year.
The following table presents the Bank's mortgage loans outstanding by redemption terms (dollars in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
2025
|
|
2024
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
Due in one year through five years
|
33
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
Due after five years through 15 years
|
33
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Total unpaid principal balance
|
77
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
Other adjustment, net (1)
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Total mortgage loans held for portfolio
|
77
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
$
|
89
|
|
____________
(1) Consists of premiums, discounts, and hedging adjustments.
Members that sold mortgage loans to the Bank were located primarily in the southeastern United States; therefore, the Bank's conventional mortgage loan portfolio was concentrated in that region as of December 31, 2025 and 2024. The following table presents the percentage of unpaid principal balance of conventional residential mortgage loans held for portfolio for the five largest state concentrations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
2025
|
|
2024
|
|
|
Percent of Total
|
|
Percent of Total
|
|
Florida
|
21.53
|
|
|
21.98
|
|
|
South Carolina
|
20.01
|
|
|
20.79
|
|
|
Virginia
|
11.85
|
|
|
11.37
|
|
|
Georgia
|
10.61
|
|
|
10.76
|
|
|
North Carolina
|
7.89
|
|
|
8.04
|
|
|
All other
|
28.11
|
|
|
27.06
|
|
|
Total
|
100.00
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
Deposits
The Bank offers demand and overnight deposit programs to members and qualifying non-members primarily as a liquidity management service. In addition, a member that services mortgage loans may deposit funds in the Bank that are collected in connection with the mortgage loans, pending disbursement of those funds. All the Bank's deposits are uninsured. For demand deposits, the Bank pays interest at the overnight rate. Most of these deposits represent member liquidity investments, which members may withdraw on demand. Therefore, the total account balance of the Bank's deposits may fluctuate significantly. As a matter of prudence, the Bank typically invests deposit funds in liquid short-term assets. Member loan demand, deposit flows, and liquidity management strategies influence the amount and volatility of deposit balances carried with the Bank.
Consolidated Obligations
The Bank funds its assets primarily through the issuance of consolidated obligation bonds and consolidated obligation discount notes. Consolidated obligation issuances financed 91.4 percent of the $146.2 billion in total assets as of December 31, 2025, a slight decrease from the financing ratio of 92.4 percent as of December 31, 2024.
The Bank often simultaneously entered into derivatives with the issuance of fixed-rate consolidated obligation bonds to convert the interest rates, in effect, into short-term variable interest rates, primarily based on SOFR. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, 92.4 percent and 92.1 percent, respectively, of the Bank's fixed-rate consolidated obligation bonds were swapped. None of the Bank's variable-rate consolidated obligation bonds were swapped as of December 31, 2025 and 2024. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, 89.9 percent and 64.3 percent, respectively, of the Bank's fixed-rate consolidated obligation discount notes were swapped.
Capital
The FHLBank Act and FHFA regulations specify that each FHLBank must meet certain minimum regulatory capital standards. These regulatory capital requirements, and the Bank's compliance with these requirements, are presented in detail inNote 9-Capital to the Bank's 2025 audited financial statements.
Additionally, an FHFA Advisory Bulletin sets forth guidance for each FHLBank to maintain a ratio of at least two percent of capital stock to total assets, measured on a daily average basis at month end. As of December 31, 2025, the Bank was in compliance with this ratio.
Under the Bank's financial management policy, the Bank's targets were to maintain (1) a capital-to-assets ratio of 4.50 percent to 6.00 percent; (2) a retained earnings account balance equal to the restricted retained earnings account balance, plus extremely stressed scenario losses; and (3) unrestricted retained earnings greater than the retained earnings target. The Bank believes that daily excess stock repurchases and reasonable quarterly dividends give members greater certainty of a return of their principal or the receipt of a dividend, which in turn may have a positive impact on members' appetite for advances. The Bank seeks to pay an amount of dividends each quarter that are consistent with an attractive rate of return on capital to its member shareholders relative to an established benchmark after providing for retained earnings as discussed above. The Bank uses SOFR as the benchmark index for its dividend spreads. The Bank's ability to maintain dividends depends on the Bank's actual performance, its ability to maintain adequate retained earnings, other factors described inItem 1A. Risk Factors, and the discretion of the Bank's board of directors. Information about dividends paid by the Bank during 2025, 2024, and 2023, is contained in Note 9-Capitalto the Bank's 2025 audited financial statements.
Results of Operations
The following is a discussion and analysis of the Bank's results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.
Net Interest Income
The primary source of the Bank's earnings is net interest income. Net interest income equals interest earned on assets (including member advances, mortgage loans, MBS held in portfolio, and other investments), less the interest expense incurred on liabilities (including consolidated obligations, deposits, and other borrowings). Also included in net interest income are miscellaneous related items such as prepayment fees, the amortization of debt issuance discounts, concession fees, and certain derivative instruments and hedging activities related adjustments.
The following table presents key components of net interest income for the years presented (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2025
|
|
2024
|
|
2023
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances
|
$
|
4,605
|
|
|
$
|
5,467
|
|
|
$
|
6,681
|
|
|
Investments
|
2,510
|
|
|
2,881
|
|
|
2,719
|
|
|
Mortgage loans
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
7,119
|
|
|
8,353
|
|
|
9,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated obligations
|
6,171
|
|
|
7,286
|
|
|
8,415
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
91
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
6,262
|
|
|
7,387
|
|
|
8,517
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
$
|
857
|
|
|
$
|
966
|
|
|
$
|
889
|
|
When an advance is prepaid, the Bank could suffer lower future income if the principal portion of the prepaid advance is reinvested in lower-yielding assets. To protect against this risk, the Bank charges a borrower a prepayment fee when the borrower prepays certain advances before the original maturity, which makes the Bank financially indifferent to a borrower's decision to prepay an advance. The Bank records prepayment fees net of basis adjustments, which are primarily related to hedging activities included in the carrying value of the advance, as interest income on advances on the Statements of Income.
The following table presents the components of net advances prepayment fees for the years presented (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2025
|
|
2024
|
|
2023
|
|
Gross amount of prepayment fees received from advance borrowers
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
Gross amount of prepayment credits paid to advance borrowers
|
|
(21)
|
|
|
(39)
|
|
|
(92)
|
|
|
Hedging fair value adjustments on prepaid advances
|
|
12
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
Other
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Net advances prepayment fees
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
The following tables present the change in interest income and expense due to volume or rate variance for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023 (dollars in millions). The interest-rate spread is affected by the inclusion or exclusion of net interest income or expense associated with the Bank's derivatives. If the derivatives do not qualify for fair-value hedge accounting under GAAP, the interest income or expense associated with the derivatives is excluded from net interest income and from the calculation of interest-rate spread and is recorded in "Non-interest income." Amortization associated with hedging-related basis adjustments is also reflected in net interest income, which affects interest-rate spread.
The net yield on interest-earning assets was 55 basis points, 64 basis points, and 50 basis points for 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
Change due to
|
|
|
2025
|
|
2024
|
|
|
|
Average Balance
|
|
Interest
|
|
Yield/
Rate
(%)
|
|
Average Balance
|
|
Interest
|
|
Yield/
Rate
(%)
|
|
Volumes(6)
|
|
Rate (6)
|
|
Net Change
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits (1)
|
$
|
3,121
|
|
|
$
|
134
|
|
|
4.29
|
|
|
$
|
3,155
|
|
|
$
|
168
|
|
|
5.33
|
|
|
$
|
(2)
|
|
|
$
|
(32)
|
|
|
$
|
(34)
|
|
|
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
|
5,765
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
4.25
|
|
|
6,241
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
5.18
|
|
|
(23)
|
|
|
(56)
|
|
|
(79)
|
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
13,432
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
4.27
|
|
|
13,148
|
|
|
686
|
|
|
5.22
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
(128)
|
|
|
(113)
|
|
|
Investment securities (2)
|
32,024
|
|
|
1,558
|
|
|
4.87
|
|
|
30,298
|
|
|
1,703
|
|
|
5.62
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
(238)
|
|
|
(145)
|
|
|
Advances (3)
|
100,683
|
|
|
4,605
|
|
|
4.57
|
|
|
98,834
|
|
|
5,467
|
|
|
5.53
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
(962)
|
|
|
(862)
|
|
|
Mortgage loans (4)
|
84
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5.30
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
5.35
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
Loans to other FHLBanks
|
2
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
3.98
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
155,111
|
|
|
7,119
|
|
|
4.59
|
|
|
151,772
|
|
|
8,353
|
|
|
5.50
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
(1,416)
|
|
|
(1,234)
|
|
|
Non-interest-earning assets
|
1,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
$
|
156,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
153,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits (5)
|
$
|
2,205
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
4.14
|
|
|
$
|
2,006
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
5.04
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
(19)
|
|
|
(10)
|
|
|
Consolidated obligations, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount notes
|
30,157
|
|
|
1,267
|
|
|
4.20
|
|
|
23,573
|
|
|
1,210
|
|
|
5.13
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
(244)
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Bonds
|
113,748
|
|
|
4,904
|
|
|
4.31
|
|
|
116,794
|
|
|
6,076
|
|
|
5.20
|
|
|
(155)
|
|
|
(1,017)
|
|
|
(1,172)
|
|
|
Other borrowings
|
6
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
4.82
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
4.67
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
146,116
|
|
|
6,262
|
|
|
4.29
|
|
|
142,377
|
|
|
7,387
|
|
|
5.19
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
(1,280)
|
|
|
(1,125)
|
|
|
Non-interest-bearing liabilities
|
1,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital
|
8,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and capital
|
$
|
156,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
153,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-rate spread
|
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
106.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net yield on interest-earning assets(7)
|
$
|
155,111
|
|
|
$
|
857
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
|
$
|
151,772
|
|
|
$
|
966
|
|
|
0.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
(136)
|
|
|
$
|
(109)
|
|
____________
(1)Includes amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral paid under master netting agreements with derivative counterparties.
(2)Includes available-for-sale securities at amortized cost.
(3)Interest income and average yield include net prepayment fees on advances that were not material for the reported periods.
(4)Nonperforming mortgage loans are included in average balances used to determine average rate.
(5)Includes amounts recognized for the right to return cash collateral received under master netting agreements with derivative counterparties.
(6) Volume change is calculated as the change in volume multiplied by the previous rate, while rate change is calculated as the change in rate multiplied by the
previous volume. The rate/volume change, calculated as the change in rate multiplied by the change in volume, is allocated between volume change and rate
change at the ratio each component bears to the absolute value of its total.
(7) Calculated as interest earnings divided by total-earning assets, with net interest earnings equaling the difference between total interest earned and total
interest paid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
Change due to
|
|
|
2024
|
|
2023
|
|
|
|
Average Balance
|
|
Interest
|
|
Yield/
Rate
(%)
|
|
Average Balance
|
|
Interest
|
|
Yield/
Rate
(%)
|
|
Volumes(6)
|
|
Rate (6)
|
|
Net Change
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits (1)
|
$
|
3,155
|
|
|
$
|
168
|
|
|
5.33
|
|
|
$
|
4,274
|
|
|
$
|
222
|
|
|
5.18
|
|
|
$
|
(60)
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
(54)
|
|
|
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
|
6,241
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
5.18
|
|
|
6,910
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
5.03
|
|
|
(34)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
(23)
|
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
13,148
|
|
|
686
|
|
|
5.22
|
|
|
14,035
|
|
|
717
|
|
|
5.11
|
|
|
(46)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
(31)
|
|
|
Investment securities (2)
|
30,298
|
|
|
1,703
|
|
|
5.62
|
|
|
28,249
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
|
5.07
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
Advances (3)
|
98,834
|
|
|
5,467
|
|
|
5.53
|
|
|
125,385
|
|
|
6,681
|
|
|
5.33
|
|
|
(1,460)
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
(1,214)
|
|
|
Mortgage loans (4)
|
96
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
5.35
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
5.45
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
Loans to other FHLBanks
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
4.64
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
151,772
|
|
|
8,353
|
|
|
5.50
|
|
|
178,972
|
|
|
9,406
|
|
|
5.26
|
|
|
(1,493)
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
(1,053)
|
|
|
Non-interest-earning assets
|
1,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
$
|
153,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
180,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits (5)
|
$
|
2,006
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
5.04
|
|
|
$
|
2,047
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
4.97
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
Consolidated obligations, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount notes
|
23,573
|
|
|
1,210
|
|
|
5.13
|
|
|
35,727
|
|
|
1,798
|
|
|
5.03
|
|
|
(624)
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
(588)
|
|
|
Bonds
|
116,794
|
|
|
6,076
|
|
|
5.20
|
|
|
130,579
|
|
|
6,617
|
|
|
5.07
|
|
|
(713)
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
(541)
|
|
|
Other borrowings
|
4
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
4.67
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
8.81
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
142,377
|
|
|
7,387
|
|
|
5.19
|
|
|
168,354
|
|
|
8,517
|
|
|
5.06
|
|
|
(1,339)
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
(1,130)
|
|
|
Non-interest-bearing liabilities
|
2,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,653
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital
|
8,383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,736
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and capital
|
$
|
153,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
180,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-rate spread
|
|
|
|
|
0.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
106.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net yield on interest-earning assets(7)
|
$
|
151,772
|
|
|
$
|
966
|
|
|
0.64
|
|
|
$
|
178,972
|
|
|
$
|
889
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(154)
|
|
|
$
|
231
|
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
____________
(1)Includes amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral paid under master netting agreements with derivative counterparties.
(2)Includes available-for-sale securities at amortized cost.
(3)Interest income and average yield include net prepayment fees on advances that were not material for the reported periods.
(4)Nonperforming mortgage loans are included in average balances used to determine average rate.
(5)Includes amounts recognized for the right to return cash collateral received under master netting agreements with derivative counterparties.
(6) Volume change is calculated as the change in volume multiplied by the previous rate, while rate change is calculated as the change in rate multiplied by the
previous volume. The rate/volume change, calculated as the change in rate multiplied by the change in volume, is allocated between volume change and rate
change at the ratio each component bears to the absolute value of its total.
(7) Calculated as interest earnings divided by total-earning assets, with net interest earnings equaling the difference between total interest earned and total
interest paid.
Derivatives and Hedging Activity
As discussed above, net interest income includes components of hedging activity. When hedging relationships qualify for hedge accounting, the interest components of the hedging derivatives will be reflected in interest income or expense. Fair value gains and losses of derivatives and hedged items designated in fair value hedging relationships are also recognized in interest income or interest expense. When a hedging relationship is discontinued, the cumulative fair value adjustment on the hedged item will be amortized into interest income or expense over the remaining life of the asset or liability.
The following tables present the net effect of derivatives and hedging activity on the Bank's results of operations for the years presented (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2025
|
|
|
Advances
|
|
Investments
|
|
Consolidated
Obligation
Bonds
|
|
Consolidated
Obligation
Discount
Notes
|
|
Total
|
|
Net interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization or accretion of hedging activities
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(210)
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(206)
|
|
|
Net changes in fair value hedges
|
(7)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
Net interest settlements on derivatives(1)
|
248
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
(465)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
(196)
|
|
|
Price alignment amount (2)
|
(13)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
(15)
|
|
|
Amortization or accretion of inactive hedging relationships
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
Total effect on net interest income
|
$
|
232
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
(469)
|
|
|
$
|
(3)
|
|
|
$
|
(217)
|
|
|
Effect on non-interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on derivatives not receiving hedge accounting including net interest settlements
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2024
|
|
|
Advances
|
|
Investments
|
|
Consolidated
Obligation
Bonds
|
|
Consolidated
Obligation
Discount
Notes
|
|
Total
|
|
Net interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization or accretion of hedging activities
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(466)
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(465)
|
|
|
Net changes in fair value hedges
|
8
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
Net interest settlements on derivatives(1)
|
472
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
(1,120)
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
(626)
|
|
|
Price alignment amount (2)
|
(27)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
(11)
|
|
|
(38)
|
|
|
Amortization or accretion of inactive hedging relationships
|
13
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
Total effect on net interest income
|
$
|
467
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
(1,118)
|
|
|
$
|
(17)
|
|
|
$
|
(638)
|
|
|
Effect on non-interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on derivatives not receiving hedge accounting including net interest settlements
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2023
|
|
|
Advances
|
|
Investments
|
|
Consolidated
Obligation
Bonds
|
|
Consolidated
Obligation
Discount
Notes
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
Total
|
|
Net interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization or accretion of hedging activities
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(456)
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(446)
|
|
|
Net changes in fair value hedges
|
(9)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
Net interest settlements on derivatives (1)
|
499
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
(1,314)
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(813)
|
|
|
Price alignment amount (2)
|
(39)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(43)
|
|
|
Amortization or accretion of inactive hedging relationships
|
9
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Total effect on net interest income
|
$
|
470
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
(1,319)
|
|
|
$
|
(8)
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(852)
|
|
|
Effect on non-interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Losses) gains on derivatives not receiving hedge accounting including net interest settlements
|
$
|
(4)
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
(1)
|
|
|
$
|
(4)
|
|
____________
(1)Represents interest income or expense on derivatives included in net interest income.
(2)This amount is for derivatives for which variation margin is characterized as daily settled contract.
Non-Interest Expense and AHP Assessment
The following table presents non-interest expense and AHP assessment for the years presented (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2025
|
|
2024
|
|
2023
|
|
2025 vs. 2024
|
|
2024 vs. 2023
|
|
Non-interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
Cost of quarters
|
10
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
48
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
145
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
Federal Housing Finance Agency and Office of Finance
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Voluntary housing and community investment
|
46
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
Other
|
4
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense
|
216
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
Affordable Housing Program assessment
|
67
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
(10)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense and AHP assessment
|
$
|
283
|
|
|
$
|
292
|
|
|
$
|
245
|
|
|
$
|
(9)
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
The Bank records statutory AHP assessment expense at a rate of 10 percent of income before assessment, excluding interest expense on mandatorily redeemable capital stock.
In addition to the statutory AHP assessment, the Bank may make voluntary contributions to the AHP or other housing and community initiatives, collectively referred to as voluntary contributions. Beginning in 2024, the Bank set a commitment to attain voluntary contributions at a minimum of five percent of its prior year's annual income subject to assessment and prior year's voluntary contributions. Income subject to assessment is defined as the Bank's net income before assessments, plus interest expense related to mandatorily redeemable capital stock. Voluntary contributions reduce net income subject to assessments, and therefore reduce statutory AHP expense. As such, the Bank has committed to make supplemental voluntary contributions to AHP by an amount that equals what the statutory AHP assessment would be in the absence of these effects.
The following table presents the calculation of the net income subject to assessment, adjusted for voluntary contributions fulfillment to show how the bank's supplemental voluntary AHP contribution restores the AHP amounts to 10 percent of the Bank's earnings absent the Bank's voluntary commitment fulfillment (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2025
|
|
2024
|
|
Net income subject to statutory assessment
|
|
$
|
669
|
|
|
$
|
774
|
|
|
Adjustment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary housing and community investment recognized in Statements of Income (1)
|
|
41
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Supplemental voluntary AHP contributions for the current year (2)
|
|
5
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Net income subject to assessment, as adjusted (3)
|
|
$
|
715
|
|
|
$
|
823
|
|
|
10 percent of net income subject to assessment, as adjusted
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
Statutory AHP assessment
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
Supplemental voluntary AHP contributions for the current year (2)
|
|
5
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Total statutory AHP assessment and supplemental voluntary AHP contributions for the current year
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
__________
(1)Excludes supplemental AHP contributions for the current year.
(2)Equals 10 percent of voluntary housing and community investment.
(3)Represents the calculated amount of earnings that would be available for AHP assessment if the Bank had not made the voluntary contributions,
which reduce net income before assessments which, in turn, reduces the statutory AHP assessment.
The following table presents the calculation of the voluntary contribution target of the Bank (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2025
|
|
2024
|
|
Prior year's net income subject to statutory assessment
|
|
$
|
774
|
|
|
$
|
721
|
|
|
Voluntary commitment percentage
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
Unadjusted voluntary contribution commitment
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
Adjustment for supplemental voluntary AHP contributions for the prior year
|
|
2
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Voluntary contribution commitment target
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
The following table presents the fulfillment of voluntary contribution target of the Bank (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2025
|
|
2024
|
|
Voluntary housing and community investment recognized in Statements of Income
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
Supplemental voluntary AHP contributions for the current year (1)
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
Voluntary contribution fulfillment
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
Prior year's net income subject to statutory assessment
|
|
$
|
774
|
|
|
$
|
721
|
|
|
Prior year's voluntary housing and community investment
|
|
49
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
Total prior year's income subject to five percent commitment target
|
|
$
|
823
|
|
|
$
|
740
|
|
|
Actual fulfillment percentage (2)
|
|
5.01
|
%
|
|
5.95
|
%
|
__________
(1) Equals 10 percent of voluntary housing and community investment.
(2) Calculated as voluntary contribution fulfillment divided by total prior year's income subject to five percent commitment target.
Refer to Note 8-Affordable Housing Program and Voluntary Contributionsto the Bank's 2025 audited financial statements for additional information about the Bank's voluntary programs.
Additional Financial Data.
The following table presents additional financial data for the last five fiscal years (dollars in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of or for the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2025
|
|
2024
|
|
2023
|
|
2022
|
|
2021
|
|
Statements of Condition (as of year end)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
$
|
146,236
|
|
|
$
|
147,091
|
|
|
$
|
152,370
|
|
|
$
|
151,622
|
|
|
$
|
78,746
|
|
|
Advances
|
94,978
|
|
|
85,829
|
|
|
96,608
|
|
|
109,595
|
|
|
45,415
|
|
|
Investments (1)
|
50,049
|
|
|
60,084
|
|
|
54,207
|
|
|
40,902
|
|
|
31,821
|
|
|
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net
|
77
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
Consolidated obligations, net (2)
|
133,641
|
|
|
135,851
|
|
|
141,572
|
|
|
141,510
|
|
|
71,692
|
|
|
Total capital stock Class B putable
|
5,607
|
|
|
5,148
|
|
|
5,597
|
|
|
5,397
|
|
|
2,383
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
2,994
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
|
2,524
|
|
|
2,283
|
|
|
2,228
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
20
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
(34)
|
|
|
(16)
|
|
|
Total capital
|
8,621
|
|
|
7,933
|
|
|
8,116
|
|
|
7,646
|
|
|
4,595
|
|
|
Statements of Income (for the year ended)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
857
|
|
|
966
|
|
|
889
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
Standby letters of credit fees
|
23
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
Net income
|
602
|
|
|
697
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
Performance Ratios (%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on equity (3)
|
6.90
|
|
|
8.31
|
|
|
7.43
|
|
|
3.18
|
|
|
2.79
|
|
|
Return on assets (4)
|
0.38
|
|
|
0.45
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
|
Net yield on interest-earning assets
|
0.55
|
|
|
0.64
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
|
0.34
|
|
|
Interest-rate spread
|
0.30
|
|
|
0.31
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
|
0.34
|
|
|
Regulatory capital ratio (as of year end) (5)
|
5.88
|
|
|
5.39
|
|
|
5.33
|
|
|
5.07
|
|
|
5.86
|
|
|
Total average equity to average assets
|
5.56
|
|
|
5.46
|
|
|
4.83
|
|
|
4.98
|
|
|
5.74
|
|
|
Dividend payout ratio (6)
|
65.47
|
|
|
62.52
|
|
|
62.86
|
|
|
70.11
|
|
|
77.27
|
|
____________
(1) Investments consist of interest-bearing deposits, securities purchased under agreements to resell, federal funds sold, and securities classified as available-for-sale and held-to-maturity.
(2)The amounts presented are the Bank's primary obligations on consolidated obligations outstanding. The par value of the other FHLBanks' outstanding consolidated obligations for which the Bank is jointly and severally liable was as follows (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2025
|
$
|
1,017,701
|
|
|
December 31, 2024
|
1,056,184
|
|
|
December 31, 2023
|
1,061,022
|
|
|
December 31, 2022
|
1,037,537
|
|
|
December 31, 2021
|
580,909
|
|
(3) Calculated as net income, divided by average total equity.
(4) Calculated as net income, divided by average total assets.
(5) Regulatory capital ratio is regulatory capital, which does not include accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, but does include mandatorily redeemable capital stock, as a percentage of total assets as of year end.
(6) Calculated as dividends declared during the year, divided by net income during the year.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is necessary to satisfy members' borrowing needs on a timely basis, repay maturing and called consolidated obligations, and meet other obligations and operating requirements. Many members rely on the Bank as a source of standby liquidity, so the Bank attempts to be in a position to meet member funding needs on a timely basis. The Bank is required to maintain liquidity in accordance with the FHLBank Act, FHFA regulations, and policies established by the Bank's management and board of directors. In addition, the FHFA, at times, has issued guidance and expectations to the FHLBanks related to liquidity.
Sources of Liquidity
The Bank's principal source of liquidity is consolidated obligation debt instruments. To provide additional liquidity, the Bank also may use other short-term borrowings, such as federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and
loans from other FHLBanks. The Bank's consolidated obligations are not obligations of the U.S. and are not guaranteed by either the U.S. or any government agency, but have historically received the same credit rating as the government bond credit rating of the United States. As a result, the Bank generally has comparatively stable access to funding through a diverse investor base at relatively favorable spreads to U.S. Treasury rates. The Bank's income and liquidity would be adversely affected if it were not able to access the capital markets at competitive rates for an extended period.
The Bank's short-term funding is generally driven by member advance demand and is achieved through the issuance of consolidated discount notes and short-term consolidated bonds. Access to short-term debt markets has been reliable because investors, driven by increased liquidity preferences and risk aversion, including the effects of SEC money market fund reforms, have often sought the Bank's short-term debt as an asset of choice.
The Bank is focused on maintaining an adequate liquidity balance and a funding balance between its financial assets and financial liabilities. The Bank monitors the funding balance between financial assets and financial liabilities and is committed to prudent risk management practices. In managing and monitoring the amounts of assets that require refunding, the Bank considers contractual maturities of its financial assets, as well as certain assumptions regarding expected cash flows (i.e., estimated prepayments and scheduled amortizations). External factors including Bank member borrowing needs, supply and demand in the debt markets, and other factors may also affect the liquidity balances and the funding balance between financial assets and financial liabilities.
Contingency plans are in place that prioritize the allocation of liquidity resources in the event of operational disruptions at the Bank or the Office of Finance. Under the FHLBank Act, the Secretary of Treasury has the authority, at their discretion, to purchase consolidated obligations up to an aggregate amount of $4.0 billion. No borrowings under this authority have been outstanding since 1977.
Liquidity Reserves for Deposits
FHFA regulations require the Bank to hold a total amount of obligations of the United States, deposits in eligible banks or trust companies, or advances with maturities not exceeding five years, in an amount not less than the amount of total member deposits. The Bank has complied with this requirement throughout 2025.
Operational Liquidity
In order to ensure adequate operational liquidity (generally, the ready cash and borrowing capacity available to meet the Bank's intraday needs) each day, Bank policy establishes a daily liquidity target based upon member deposit levels and current day liability maturities and asset settlements. The Bank has met this liquidity requirement throughout 2025.
Additional Liquidity Guidance
The FHFA issued an Advisory Bulletin on FHLBank liquidity (Liquidity Guidance AB) that communicates the FHFA's expectations with respect to the maintenance of sufficient liquidity to enable the Bank to provide advances and standby letters of credit for members during a sustained capital market disruption, assuming no access to capital markets and assuming renewal of all maturing advances for a period of between ten to thirty calendar days. The FHFA periodically issues supervisory letters that identify thresholds for measures of liquidity within the established ranges set forth in the Liquidity Guidance AB.
The Liquidity Guidance AB's measurements of liquidity include a cash flow scenario, on a daily basis, that projects forward the number of days for which the Bank should maintain positive cash balances, assuming the renewal of all maturing advances and the maintenance of a liquidity reserve for outstanding letters of credit. The measurements of liquidity also include a funding gap measurement of the difference between assets and liabilities that are scheduled to mature during a specified period, expressed as a percentage of the Bank's total assets to reduce the liquidity risks associated with a mismatch in asset and liability maturities, including an undue reliance on short-term debt funding, which may increase debt rollover risk. The Liquidity Guidance AB permits an FHLBank to temporarily decrease its liquidity position, in a safe and sound manner, below the stated regulatory levels, as necessary for providing unanticipated extensions of advances to members or draws on letters of credit to beneficiaries. The Bank has met this liquidity requirement as directed by the FHFA throughout 2025.
Summary of Cash Flows
The following table presents a summary of net cash provided by (used in) the Bank's operating, investing, and financing activities (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2025
|
|
2024
|
|
2023
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
826
|
|
|
$
|
455
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
2,473
|
|
|
5,640
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
(2,498)
|
|
|
(6,573)
|
|
|
(1,404)
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and due from banks
|
$
|
(16)
|
|
|
$
|
(107)
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
The primary drivers that can impact net operating cash flows are fluctuations in net income and changes in certain adjustments to net income which may include amortization, accretion, derivative and hedging activities, and other adjustments. Cash flows related to investing and financing activities primarily relate to providing liquidity for various Bank-related activities. The Bank's primary uses of liquidity are advance originations and consolidated obligation payments. Other uses of liquidity are investment purchases and dividends.
Off-balance Sheet Commitments
The Bank's primary off-balance sheet commitments are as follows:
•the Bank's joint and several liability for all FHLBank consolidated obligations; and
•the Bank's outstanding commitments arising from standby letters of credit.
As of December 31, 2025, the FHLBanks had $1,151.8 billion in aggregate par value of consolidated obligations issued and outstanding, $134.1 billion of which was attributable to the Bank. Should an FHLBank be unable to satisfy its payment obligation under a consolidated obligation for which it is the primary obligor, any of the other FHLBanks, including the Bank, can be called upon to repay all or any part of such payment obligation, as determined or approved by the FHFA. No FHLBank has ever defaulted on its principal or interest payments under any consolidated obligation, and the Bank has never been required to make payments under any consolidated obligation because of the failure of another FHLBank to meet its obligations. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the FHFA was not required to allocate any obligation among the FHLBanks and the Bank currently believes the likelihood it would have to pay any amounts beyond those for which it is primarily liable is remote. Accordingly, the Bank has not recognized a liability for its joint and several obligations related to other FHLBanks' consolidated obligations as of December 31, 2025 and 2024.
The Bank generally requires standby letters of credit to contain language permitting the Bank, upon annual renewal dates and prior notice to the beneficiary, to choose not to renew the standby letter of credit, which effectively terminates the standby letter of credit prior to its scheduled final expiration date. Based on the creditworthiness of the member applicant and appropriate additional fees, the Bank may issue standby letters of credit that have terms longer than one year without annual renewals or that have no stated maturity and are subject to renewal on an annual basis.
Commitments to extend credit, including standby letters of credit, are agreements to lend. The Bank issues a standby letter of credit on behalf of a member in exchange for a fee. A member may use these standby letters of credit to facilitate a financing arrangement. Management regularly reviews its standby letter of credit pricing in light of several factors, including the Bank's potential liquidity needs related to draws on its standby letters of credit. Based on management's credit analyses and collateral requirements, the Bank did not deem it necessary to have an allowance for credit losses for these unfunded standby letters of credit as of December 31, 2025.
Refer to Note 14-Commitments and Contingenciesto the Bank's 2025 audited financial statements for more information about the Bank's outstanding standby letters of credit.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of the Bank's financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make a number of judgments and assumptions that impacts the Bank's financial condition and results of operations. Several of the Bank's accounting estimates are inherently subject to valuation assumptions and other subjective assessments and are more critical than others to the Bank's results. The critical accounting estimates relating to the fair value measurement of interest-rate related derivatives and associated hedged items are generally considered to be the most critical because it requires management's subjective and complex judgments about matters, including forward interest-rate assumptions, that are inherently uncertain. Management bases its judgments and estimates on current market conditions and industry practices, historical experience, changes in the business environment and other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Derivative instruments are carried at fair value on the Statements of Condition. Any change in the fair value of a derivative is recorded each period in current period earnings. Therefore, the assumptions and judgment most critical to the application of this accounting policy are those affecting the estimation of fair values of derivative instruments and the related hedged items, which may have a significant impact on the Bank's financial condition and results of operations. A majority of the Bank's derivatives are structured to offset some or all of the risk exposure inherent in its lending, investment, and funding activities. The Bank seeks to utilize hedging techniques that are effective under the hedge accounting requirements; however, in some cases, the Bank has elected to enter into derivatives that are economically effective at reducing risk but do not meet hedge accounting requirements (non-qualifying hedge). Non-qualifying hedges introduce the potential for considerable income variability from period to period. Specifically, a mismatch can exist between the timing of income and expense recognition from assets or liabilities and the income effects of derivative instruments positioned to mitigate market risk and cash flow variability. Therefore, during periods of significant changes in interest rates and other market factors, reported earnings may exhibit considerable variability. The total notional amount of derivatives was $110.0 billion as of December 31, 2025, of which 99.95 percent were designated as hedging instruments, and the fair value of derivative assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2025 was $334 million and $4 million, respectively.
The Bank bases the fair values of derivatives on instruments with similar terms or market prices, when available. However, active markets do not exist for many of the Bank's derivatives. Consequently, fair values for these instruments are generally estimated using standard valuation techniques such as discounted cash flow analysis, which uses observable market inputs, such as discount rate, forward interest rates, and volatility assumptions. Observable market inputs are actively quoted and can be validated to external sources. Refer to Note 13-Estimated Fair Valuesto the Bank's 2025 audited financial statements for further discussion regarding valuation methodologies and primary inputs used to develop the fair value measurement for these instruments.
A hedging relationship is created from the designation of a derivative financial instrument as hedging the Bank's exposure to changes in the fair value of a financial instrument. Fair value hedge accounting allows for the offsetting fair value of the hedged risk in the hedged item to also be recorded in current period earnings. Perfectly effective hedges that use interest-rate swaps as the hedging instrument and that meet certain stringent criteria can qualify for "shortcut" fair value hedge accounting. Shortcut hedge accounting allows for the assumption of no ineffectiveness, which means that the change in fair value of the hedged item can be assumed to be equal to the change in fair value of the derivative. The Bank does not apply shortcut hedge accounting.
For derivative transactions that potentially qualify for long-haul fair value hedge accounting treatment, management must assess how effective the derivatives have been, and are expected to be, in hedging offsetting changes in the estimated fair values attributable to the risks being hedged in the hedged items. Quantitative hedge effectiveness testing is performed at the inception of the hedging relationship and on an ongoing basis for long-haul fair value hedges. The Bank performs testing at hedge inception based on regression analysis of the hypothetical performance of the hedging relationship using historical market data. The Bank then perform regression testing on an ongoing basis using accumulated actual values in conjunction with hypothetical values. For the hedging relationship to be considered effective, results must fall within established tolerances. If the hedge fails effectiveness testing, the hedge no longer qualifies for hedge accounting and the derivative is marked to estimated fair value through current period earnings without any offsetting change in estimated fair value related to the hedged item.
Recently Issued But Not Yet Adopted Accounting Standards
See Note 2-Summary of Significant Accounting Policiesto the Bank's 2025 audited financial statements for a discussion of recently issued but not yet adopted accounting standards.
Legislative and Regulatory Developments
Certain significant legislative and regulatory actions and developments are summarized below.
The Bank is subject to various legal and regulatory requirements and priorities. Certain actions, regulatory priorities, and areas of focus, such as deregulation, by the federal executive administration have changed and continue to change the regulatory environment. For example, the FHFA repealed the Fair Lending, Fair Housing, and Equitable Housing Finance Plans regulation applicable to the FHLBanks, effective March 9, 2026, citing the federal executive administration's deregulatory priorities. Furthermore, during 2025, withdrawals and rescissions of certain rules, proposed rules, and advisory, regulatory, or technical guidance, have affected, and likely will continue to affect, certain aspects of the Bank's business operations. These changes could have impact on the Bank's financial condition, results of operations, and reputation.
On January 20, 2026, the federal executive administration issued an executive order that seeks to restrict acquisitions by large institutional investors of single-family homes. Among other things, the executive order directs certain agencies, including the FHFA, to issue guidance to (i) prevent agencies and government-sponsored enterprises from providing for, approving, insuring, guaranteeing, securitizing, or facilitating the acquisition by a large institutional investor of a single-family home that could otherwise be purchased by an individual owner-occupant, or disposing of federal assets in a manner that transfers a single-family home to a large institutional investor; and (ii) promote sales to individual owner-occupants, including through anti-circumvention provisions, first-look policies, and disclosure requirements. The executive order also calls for legislative recommendations to codify related policies and directs certain agencies to conduct reviews and consider additional measures to combat speculation by large institutional investors in single-family housing markets. The Bank is unable to predict the nature of the guidance, measures or recommendations, or how each may impact the Bank's business.
Considering the changes in the regulatory environment, there is uncertainty with respect to the ultimate result of future regulatory actions and the impact they may have on the Bank and the FHLBank System. The Bank continues to monitor these actions as they evolve and to evaluate their potential impact on the Bank. For a discussion of related risks, please refer to Item 1A-Risk Factors.
Risk Management
The Bank's lending, investment and funding activities, and use of derivative hedge instruments expose the Bank to a number of risks. The Bank's robust risk management framework is designed to ensure appropriate balance of return for the risks assumed. The Bank's risk management framework consists of risk governance, risk appetite, and risk management policies. In addition to the established risk appetite and the RMP the Bank is also subject to FHFA regulations and policies regarding risk management.
The Bank's board of directors and management recognize that risks are inherent to the Bank's business model and that the process of establishing a risk appetite does not imply that the Bank seeks to mitigate or eliminate all risk. By defining and managing to a specific risk appetite, the board of directors and management ensure that there is a common understanding of the Bank's desired risk profile, which enhances strategic and tactical decisions. Additionally, the Bank aspires to achieve best practices in governance, ethics, and compliance. and sustain a corporate culture that supports transparency, integrity, and adherence to legal and ethical obligations.
Risk appetite is the level and type of risk the Bank is willing to accept in the pursuit of its mission, business, and strategic objectives. The Bank's board of directors and management have established a risk appetite statement and risk metrics for controlling and escalating actions based on the following seven continuing objectives that represent the foundation of the Bank's strategic and tactical planning:
Capital Adequacy- maintain adequate levels of capital components (retained earnings and capital stock) that protect against the risks inherent in the Bank's business activities and provide sufficient resiliency to withstand potential stressed scenarios.
Market Risk/Earnings- produce a competitive return on equity, while providing attractive and reliable access to funding for advance products, and maintenance of retained earnings in excess of stressed retained earnings targets within a conservative risk management framework.
Liquidity Risk- maintain sufficient liquidity and funding sources to allow the Bank to meet its operational and member liquidity needs under all reasonable economic and operational situations.
Credit and Concentration Risk- minimize credit losses by managing credit and collateral risk exposures within acceptable parameters. Achieve this objective through data-driven analysis and counterparty-specific analysis (and when appropriate perform member-specific and counterparty specific analysis), monitoring, and verification to ensure appropriate controls and that monitoring is consistent with managing existing credit and collateral risk exposures. Monitor through enhanced reporting any elevated risk concentration and manage and mitigate the increased risk.
Governance/Compliance/Legal - comply fully with all applicable laws and regulations and manage all legal risks effectively and efficiently.
Mission/Business Model- deliver financial services and consistent access to funds in the size, cost and structure members desire, helping them to manage risk and extend credit in their communities while achieving the Bank's affordable housing and community development goals and providing value to members through payment of dividends and the repurchasing of excess stock.
Operations- deliver an employee value proposition that allows the Bank to attract, engage, develop and retain staff to meet the evolving needs of the Bank's key stakeholders and effectively manage enterprise-wide risks. Manage the key risks associated with operational availability and resiliency of critical systems and services, the integrity and security of the Bank's information, and the alignment of technology investment with key business objectives through enterprise-wide risk management practices and governance based on industry standards. Manage the key risks associated with cyber security threats.
The board and management recognize risk and risk producing events are dynamic and ever-present. Accordingly, reporting, analyzing and mitigating risks are paramount to successful corporate governance. The corresponding risk appetite metrics and monitoring analysis are adopted to reflect the board's risk appetite statement and the appropriate thresholds that will trigger action and reporting.
The RMP also governs the Bank's approach to managing the above risks. The Bank's board of directors reviews the RMP annually and approves amendments to the RMP from time to time as necessary. To promote compliance with the RMP, the Bank has established internal management committees to provide oversight of these risks. The Bank produces a comprehensive risk assessment report on an annual basis that is reviewed by the board of directors.
Market Risk
General
The Bank is exposed to market risk because changes in interest rates and spreads can have a direct effect on the value of the Bank's assets and liabilities. As a result of the volume of its interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the interest-rate risk component of market risk has the greatest impact on the Bank's financial condition and results of operations.
Interest rates are impacted by various factors, including the economic environment and other aspects affecting the financial and banking industry.
Interest-rate risk represents the risk that the aggregate market value or estimated fair value of the Bank's asset, liability, and derivative portfolios will decline as a result of interest-rate volatility or that net earnings will be affected significantly by interest-rate changes. Interest-rate risk can occur in a variety of forms including repricing risk, yield-curve risk, basis risk, and option risk. The Bank faces repricing risk whenever an asset and a liability reprice at different times and with different rates, resulting in interest-margin sensitivity to changes in market interest rates. Yield-curve risk reflects the possibility that changes in the shape of the yield curve may affect the market value of the Bank's assets and liabilities differently because a liability used to fund an asset may be short-term, while the asset is long-term, or vice versa. Basis risk occurs when yields on assets and costs on liabilities are based on different bases, such SOFR versus the Bank's cost of funds. Different bases can move at different rates or in different directions, which can cause erratic changes in revenues and expenses. Option risk is presented by the optionality that is embedded in some assets and liabilities. Mortgage assets represent the primary source of option risk.
The primary goal of the Bank's interest-rate risk measurement and management efforts is to control the above risks through prudent asset-liability management strategies so that the Bank may provide members with dividends that are consistently competitive with existing market interest rates on alternative short-term and variable-rate investments. The Bank attempts to manage interest-rate risk exposure by using appropriate funding instruments and hedging strategies. Hedging may occur at the
micro level, for one or more specifically identified transactions, or at the macro level. Management evaluates the Bank's macro hedge position and funding strategies on a daily basis and makes adjustments, as necessary.
The Bank measures its potential market risk exposure in a number of ways. These include asset, liability, and equity duration analyses; and earnings forecast scenario analyses that reflect repricing gaps. The Bank establishes tolerance limits for these financial metrics and uses internal models to measure each of these risk exposures at least monthly.
Use of Derivatives
The Bank enters into derivatives to reduce the interest-rate risk exposure inherent in otherwise unhedged assets and funding positions and attempts to do so in the most cost-efficient manner. The Bank does not engage in speculative trading of these instruments. The Bank's derivative positions may include interest-rate swaps, options, swaptions, interest-rate cap and floor agreements, and forward contracts. These derivatives are used to adjust the effective maturity, repricing frequency, or option characteristics of financial instruments to achieve risk-management objectives. Within its risk management strategy, the Bank uses derivative financial instruments in the following two ways:
•As a fair-value hedge of an underlying financial instrument or a firm commitment.
For example, the Bank uses derivatives to reduce the interest-rate net sensitivity of consolidated obligations, advances, and investments by, in effect, converting them to a short-term interest rate. The Bank also uses derivatives to manage embedded options in assets and liabilities and to hedge the market value of existing assets and liabilities. The Bank's management reevaluates its hedging strategies from time to time and may change the hedging techniques used or adopt new strategies as deemed prudent.
•As an asset-liability management tool, for which hedge accounting is not applied (non-qualifying hedge).
The Bank may enter into derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting. As a result, the Bank recognizes the change in fair value and interest income or expense of these derivatives in the "Non-interest income" section of the Statements of Income with no offsetting fair-value adjustments of the hedged asset, liability, or firm commitment. Consequently, these transactions can introduce earnings volatility.
The following table presents the notional amounts of derivative financial instruments (dollars in millions). The category "Fair value hedges" represents hedge strategies for which hedge accounting is achieved. The category "Non-qualifying hedges" represents hedge strategies for which the derivatives are not in designated hedging relationships that formally meet the hedge accounting requirements under GAAP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025
|
|
2024
|
|
Hedged Item / Hedging Instrument
|
|
Hedging Objective
|
|
Hedge
Accounting
Designation
|
|
Notional Amount
|
|
Notional Amount
|
|
Advances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay fixed, receive variable interest-rate swap (without options)
|
|
Converts the advance's fixed rate to a variable-rate index.
|
|
Fair value
hedges
|
|
$
|
17,295
|
|
|
$
|
20,982
|
|
Non-qualifying
hedges
|
|
34
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Pay fixed, receive variable interest-rate swap (with options)
|
|
Converts the advance's fixed rate to a variable-rate index and offsets option risk in the advance.
|
|
Fair value
hedges
|
|
5,250
|
|
|
3,916
|
|
|
Pay fixed with embedded features, receive variable interest-rate swap (non-callable)
|
|
Reduces interest-rate sensitivity and repricing gaps by converting the advance's fixed rate to a variable-rate index and/or offsets embedded option risk in the advance.
|
|
Fair value
hedges
|
|
119
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
22,698
|
|
|
25,121
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay fixed, receive variable interest-rate swap
|
|
Converts the investment's fixed rate to a variable-rate index.
|
|
Fair value
hedges
|
|
6,930
|
|
|
4,253
|
|
|
Pay fixed, receive variable interest-rate swap (with options)
|
|
Converts the investment's fixed rate to a variable-rate index.
|
|
Fair value
hedges
|
|
1,956
|
|
|
680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
8,886
|
|
|
4,933
|
|
|
Consolidated Obligation Bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receive fixed, pay variable interest-rate swap (without options)
|
|
Converts the bond's fixed rate to a variable-rate index.
|
|
Fair value
hedges
|
|
11,464
|
|
|
11,050
|
|
|
Receive fixed, pay variable interest-rate swap (with options)
|
|
Converts the bond's fixed rate to a variable-rate index and offsets option risk in the bond.
|
|
Fair value
hedges
|
|
25,386
|
|
|
39,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
36,850
|
|
|
50,192
|
|
|
Consolidated Obligation Discount Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receive fixed, pay variable interest-rate swap
|
|
Converts the discount note's fixed rate to a variable-rate index.
|
|
Fair value
hedges
|
|
41,375
|
|
|
20,283
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay variable, receive fixed interest rate swap
|
|
Interest-rate swap not linked to specific assets, liabilities or forecasted transactions.
|
|
Non-qualifying hedges
|
|
-
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
Pay fixed, receive variable interest rate swap
|
|
Interest-rate swap not linked to specific assets, liabilities or forecasted transactions.
|
|
Non-qualifying hedges
|
|
-
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
-
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Intermediary Positions and Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay fixed, receive variable interest-rate swap, and receive fixed, pay variable interest-rate swap
|
|
To offset interest-rate swaps executed with members by executing interest-rate swaps with derivatives counterparties.
|
|
Non-qualifying
hedges
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
Total notional amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
109,828
|
|
|
$
|
100,589
|
|
Interest-rate Risk Exposure Measurement
The Bank measures interest-rate risk exposure by various methods. The primary methods used are (1) calculating the effective duration of assets, liabilities, and equity under various scenarios; and (2) calculating the theoretical market value of equity. Effective duration, normally expressed in years or months, measures the price sensitivity of the Bank's interest-bearing assets and liabilities to changes in interest rates. As effective duration lengthens, market-value changes become more sensitive to interest-rate changes. The Bank employs sophisticated modeling systems to measure effective duration.
Effective duration of equity aggregates the estimated sensitivity of market value for each of the Bank's financial assets and liabilities to changes in interest rates. Effective duration of equity is computed by taking the market value-weighted effective duration of assets, less the market value-weighted effective duration of liabilities, and dividing the remainder by the market value of equity. Market value of equity is not indicative of the market value of the Bank as a going concern or the value of the
Bank in a liquidation scenario. An effective duration gap is the measure of the difference between the estimated effective durations of portfolio assets and liabilities and summarizes the extent to which the estimated cash flows for assets and liabilities are matched, on average, over time and across interest-rate scenarios.
A positive effective duration of equity or a positive effective duration gap results when the effective duration of assets is greater than the effective duration of liabilities. A negative effective duration of equity or a negative effective duration gap results when the effective duration of assets is less than the effective duration of liabilities. A positive effective duration of equity or a positive effective duration gap generally indicates that the Bank has some exposure to interest-rate risk in a rising rate environment, and a negative effective duration of equity or a negative effective duration gap generally indicates some exposure to interest-rate risk in a declining interest-rate environment. Higher effective duration numbers, whether positive or negative, indicate greater volatility of market value of equity in response to changing interest rates.
Bank policy requires the Bank to maintain its effective duration of equity within a range of plus five years to minus five years, assuming current interest rates, and within a range of plus seven years to minus seven years, assuming an instantaneous parallel increase or decrease in market interest rates of 200 basis points.
The following table presents the Bank's effective duration exposure measurements as calculated in accordance with Bank policy (in years). The Bank's effective duration exposure measurements as of December 31, 2024 have been updated from the values previously disclosed due to model input updates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
2025
|
|
2024
|
|
|
Down 200 Basis
Points
|
|
Base Case
|
|
Up 200 Basis Points
|
|
Down 200 Basis
Points
|
|
Base Case
|
|
Up 200 Basis Points
|
|
Assets
|
0.08
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
0.07
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
Equity
|
0.31
|
|
|
1.22
|
|
|
3.58
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
1.39
|
|
|
3.10
|
|
|
Effective duration gap
|
0.01
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
The Bank uses both sophisticated computer models and an experienced professional staff to measure the amount of interest-rate risk in the balance sheet, thus allowing management to monitor the risk against policy and regulatory limits. Management regularly reviews the major assumptions and methodologies used in the Bank's models and will make adjustments to the Bank's assumptions and methodologies in response to rapid changes in economic conditions.
The prepayment risk in both advances and investment assets can significantly affect the Bank's effective duration of equity and effective duration gap. Current regulations require the Bank to mitigate advance prepayment risk by establishing prepayment fees that make the Bank financially indifferent to a borrower's decision to prepay an advance unless the advance contains explicit par value prepayment options. Bank policy establishes these prepayment fees.
The prepayment options embedded in mortgage loan and mortgage security assets may shorten or lengthen both the actual and expected cash flows when interest rates change. Current FHFA policies limit this source of interest-rate risk by limiting the types of MBS the Bank may own to those with defined estimated average life changes under specific interest-rate shock scenarios. These limits do not apply to mortgage loans purchased from members. The Bank typically hedges mortgage prepayment uncertainty by using callable debt as a funding source and by using interest-rate cap, floor, and swaption transactions. The Bank also uses derivatives to reduce effective duration and option risks for investment securities other than MBS. Effective duration and option risk exposures are measured on a regular basis for all investment assets under alternative rate scenarios.
The Bank also analyzes its interest-rate risk and market exposure by evaluating the theoretical market value of equity. The market value of equity represents the net result of the present value of future cash flows discounted to arrive at the theoretical market value of each balance sheet item. By using the discounted present value of future cash flows, the Bank is able to factor in the various maturities of assets and liabilities, similar to the effective duration analysis discussed above. The difference between the market value of total assets and the market value of total liabilities is the market value of equity. A more volatile market value of equity under different shock scenarios tends to result in a higher effective duration of equity, indicating increased sensitivity to interest rate changes.
The following table presents the Bank's market value of equity measurements as calculated in accordance with Bank policy (dollars in millions). The Bank's market value of equity measurements as of December 31, 2024 have been updated from the values previously disclosed due to model input updates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
2025
|
|
2024
|
|
|
Down 200 Basis
Points
|
|
Base Case
|
|
Up 200 Basis Points
|
|
Down 200 Basis
Points (1)
|
|
Base Case
|
|
Up 200 Basis Points
|
|
Assets
|
$
|
147,322
|
|
|
$
|
147,043
|
|
|
$
|
146,464
|
|
|
$
|
148,381
|
|
|
$
|
147,971
|
|
|
$
|
147,367
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
138,697
|
|
|
138,512
|
|
|
138,345
|
|
|
140,477
|
|
|
140,191
|
|
|
139,933
|
|
|
Equity
|
8,625
|
|
|
8,531
|
|
|
8,119
|
|
|
7,904
|
|
|
7,780
|
|
|
7,434
|
|
Under the Bank's RMP, the Bank's market value of equity must not decline by more than 15 percent, assuming an immediate, parallel, and sustained interest-rate shock of 200 basis points in either direction.
If effective duration of equity or market value of equity is approaching the boundaries of the Bank's RMP ranges, management will initiate remedial action or review alternative strategies at the next meeting of the board of directors or appropriate committee thereof.
The scenarios above generally include numerous assumptions, including those related to changes in the balance sheet, interest rates, and prepayment trends. Such assumptions may change through time as a result of a host of factors, including changes in the balance sheet as well as the interest-rate environment. The modeling process is performed in a manner consistent with the Bank's policies and procedures with results reviewed on an on-going basis by the Bank. While all of the above estimates are reflective of the general interest-rate sensitivity of the Bank, market conditions, the realized growth and remixing of the balance sheet, as well as the broader macroeconomic environment could all have a significant impact on the Bank's assets, liabilities and equity.
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Bank will be unable to meet its obligations as they come due or meet the credit needs of its members and borrowers in a timely and cost-efficient manner. The Bank's objective is to meet operational and member liquidity needs under all reasonable economic and operational situations. The Bank uses liquidity to absorb fluctuations in asset and liability balances and to provide an adequate reservoir of funding to support attractive and stable advance pricing. The Bank meets its liquidity needs from both asset and liability sources.
To address liquidity risk, the Bank uses cash flow scenario analysis and maturity gap analysis in compliance with regulatory requirements to confirm that the Bank has sufficient liquidity reserves, as discussed in further detail inItem 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Liquidity and Capital Resourcesabove.
Credit Risk
The Bank faces credit risk primarily with respect to its advances, investments, derivatives, and mortgage loan assets.
Advances
Secured advances to member financial institutions account for the largest category of Bank assets; thus, advances are a major source of the Bank's credit risk exposure. The Bank uses a risk-focused approach to credit and collateral underwriting. The Bank attempts to reduce credit risk on advances by monitoring the creditworthiness of borrowers, the Bank's exposure to a particular member, and the quality and value of the assets that borrowers pledge as eligible collateral.
The Bank determines the credit risk rating for its members by evaluating each institution's overall financial health, taking into account the quality of assets, earnings, liquidity, and capital position. Prior to November 1, 2025, the Bank assigned each borrower that is an insured depository institution a credit risk rating from 101 to 104 by utilizing an internal model (101 being the least amount of credit risk and 104 being the greatest amount of credit risk). The Bank assigned each borrower that is an insurance company a credit risk rating from 101 to 104 by utilizing an external model. The Bank assigned each borrower that is not an insured depository institution or an insurance company (including housing associates, community development financial institutions, and corporate credit unions) a credit risk rating from 101 to 104 based on an internal risk matrix developed for each entity type.
Beginning on November 1, 2025, the Bank no longer assigned each borrower a credit risk rating from 101 to 104, and transitioned to a 10 point credit risk scale rating borrowers from one to 10 according to the relative credit risk that such borrower poses to the Bank (one being the least amount of credit risk and 10 being the greatest amount of the credit risk). In general, a rating of 101 in the previous rating system equates to ratings of one through four in the new rating system, a rating of 102 equates to ratings of five through six, a rating of 103 equates to a rating of seven, and a rating of 104 equates to ratings of eight through 10.
In general, borrowers with the greatest amount of credit risk may have more restrictions on the types of collateral they may use to secure advances, may be required to maintain higher collateral maintenance levels and deliver loan collateral, may be restricted from obtaining further advances, and may face more stringent collateral reporting requirements. At times, based upon the Bank's assessment of a borrower and its collateral, the Bank may place more restrictive requirements on a borrower than those generally applicable to borrowers with the same rating. Management and the board also monitor the Bank's concentration in secured credit and standby letters of credit exposure to individual borrowers.
The following table presents the number of borrowers and the par value of advances outstanding to borrowers with the specified ratings as of the specified dates (dollars in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2025
|
|
Rating
|
|
Number of Borrowers
|
|
Par Value of Outstanding Advances
|
|
1
|
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
647
|
|
|
2
|
|
65
|
|
|
4,374
|
|
|
3
|
|
103
|
|
|
54,532
|
|
|
4
|
|
92
|
|
|
20,853
|
|
|
5
|
|
31
|
|
|
4,943
|
|
|
6
|
|
17
|
|
|
9,156
|
|
|
7
|
|
15
|
|
|
594
|
|
|
8
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
9
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
10
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Total
|
|
342
|
|
|
$
|
95,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2024
|
|
Rating
|
|
Number of Borrowers
|
|
Par Value of Outstanding Advances
|
|
101
|
|
275
|
|
$
|
67,495
|
|
|
102
|
|
57
|
|
17,703
|
|
|
103
|
|
16
|
|
|
1,076
|
|
|
104
|
|
2
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
Total
|
|
350
|
|
|
$
|
86,308
|
|
The Bank establishes a credit limit for each borrower. The credit limit is not a committed line of credit, but rather an indication of the borrower's general borrowing capacity with the Bank. The Bank determines the credit limit in its sole and absolute discretion by evaluating a wide variety of factors that indicate the borrower's overall creditworthiness. The credit limit is generally expressed as a percentage of the borrower's total assets. Credit exposure is defined as the borrower's total liabilities to the Bank, which includes the face amount of outstanding standby letters of credit, the par value of outstanding advances, and the total exposure of the Bank to the borrower under any derivative contract. Generally, borrowers are held to a credit limit of no more than 30 percent. However, the Bank's board of directors may approve a higher limit at its discretion, and such borrowers may be subject to certain additional collateral reporting and maintenance requirements. The Bank had no borrowers with a credit limit higher than 30 percent as of December 31, 2025.
The Bank obtains collateral on advances to protect against losses, but FHFA regulations permit the Bank to accept only certain types of collateral. The Bank secures priority interest in the collateral it receives from its members through contractual agreements and by timely perfecting its interest in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. Each borrower must maintain an amount of qualifying collateral that, when discounted to the lendable collateral value (LCV), is equal to at least 100 percent of the borrower's outstanding par value of all advances and other liabilities from the Bank. The LCV is the value that the Bank assigns to each type of qualifying collateral for purposes of determining the amount of credit that such qualifying collateral will support. For each type of qualifying collateral, the Bank discounts the market value of the qualifying collateral to calculate the LCV. The Bank regularly reevaluates the appropriate level of discounting. The Bank had rights to collateral on a borrower-by-borrower basis with an estimated value equal to or greater than its outstanding extension of credit as of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024. The following table presents information about the types of collateral held for the Bank's advances (dollars in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Par Value of
Outstanding
Advances
|
|
LCV of Collateral Pledged by Members
|
|
First Mortgage Collateral (%)
|
|
Securities Collateral (%)
|
|
Other Real
Estate Related Collateral (%)
|
|
As of December 31, 2025
|
$
|
95,099
|
|
|
$
|
431,730
|
|
|
60.89
|
|
|
17.75
|
|
|
21.36
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2024
|
86,308
|
|
|
403,961
|
|
|
58.25
|
|
|
19.60
|
|
|
22.15
|
|
For purposes of determining each member's LCV, the Bank estimates the current market value of all residential first mortgage loans, commercial real estate loans, home equity loans, and lines of credit pledged as collateral based on information provided by the member on its loan portfolio or on individual loans through the regular collateral reporting process. The estimated market value is discounted to account for the (1) price volatility of loans, (2) model data uncertainty, and (3) estimated liquidation and servicing costs in the event of the member's default. Market values, and thus LCVs, change monthly. The use of this market-based valuation methodology allows the Bank to establish its collateral discounts with greater precision and to provide greater transparency with respect to the valuation of collateral pledged for advances and other credit products offered by the Bank.
In its history, the Bank has never experienced a credit loss on an advance. In consideration of this and the Bank's policies and practices detailed above, the Bank has not established an allowance for credit losses on advances as of December 31, 2025 and 2024.
Investments
The Bank is subject to credit risk on investments consisting of investment securities, interest-bearing deposits, securities purchased under agreements to resell, and federal funds sold. These investments are generally transacted with government agencies and large financial institutions that are considered to be of investment quality. The FHFA defines investment quality as a security with adequate financial backing, so that full and timely payment of principal and interest on such security is expected, and there is minimal risk that the timely payment of principal and interest would not occur because of adverse changes in economic and financial conditions during the projected life of the security.
In addition to FHFA regulations, the Bank has established guidelines approved by its board of directors regarding unsecured extensions of credit, with respect to term limits and eligible counterparties.
FHFA regulations prohibit the Bank from investing in any of the following securities:
•instruments, such as common stock, that represent an ownership interest in an entity, other than stock in small business investment companies, or certain investments targeted to low-income people or communities;
•instruments issued by non-U.S. entities, other than those issued by U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks;
•debt instruments that are not of investment quality, other than certain investments targeted to low-income people or communities and instruments that the Bank determined became less than investment quality because of developments or events that occurred after purchase by the Bank;
•whole mortgages or other whole loans, other than the following: (1) those acquired under the Bank's mortgage purchase programs; (2) certain investments targeted to low-income people or communities; (3) certain marketable direct obligations of state, local, or tribal government units or agencies that are of investment quality; (4) MBS or asset-backed securities that are backed by manufactured housing loans or home equity loans; and (5) certain foreign housing loans that are authorized under section 12(b) of the FHLBank Act;
•interest-only and principal-only stripped securities;
•residual-interest or interest-accrual classes of CMOs and REMICs;
•fixed-rate or variable-rate MBS, CMOs, and REMICs that are at rates equal to their contractual cap on the trade date and that have average lives that vary by more than six years under an assumed instantaneous interest-rate change of 300 basis points; and
•non-U.S. dollar denominated securities.
FHFA regulations do not permit the Bank to rely exclusively on Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (NRSRO) ratings with respect to its investments. The Bank is required to make a determination of whether a security is of investment quality based on its own documented analysis, which includes the NRSRO rating as one of the factors that is assessed to determine investment quality. The Bank monitors the financial condition of investment counterparties to ensure that they are in compliance with the Bank's RMP and FHFA regulations. Unsecured credit exposure to any counterparty is limited by the credit quality and capital of the counterparty and by the capital of the Bank. On a regular basis, management produces financial monitoring reports detailing the financial condition of the Bank's counterparties. These reports are reviewed by the Bank's board of directors. In addition to the Bank's RMP and regulatory requirements, the Bank may limit or suspend overnight and term trading. Limiting or suspending counterparties limits the pool of available counterparties, shifts the geographical distribution of counterparty exposure, and may reduce the Bank's overall investment opportunities.
The Bank only enters into investments with U.S. counterparties or U.S. branch offices of foreign banks that have been approved by the Bank through its internal approval process, but the Bank may still have exposure to foreign entities if a counterparty's parent entity is located in another country. The following tables present the Bank's gross exposure, by instrument type, according to the location of the parent company of the counterparty (dollars in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2025
|
|
|
Federal Funds Sold
|
|
Interest-bearing
Deposits
|
|
Net Derivative Exposure (1)
|
|
Total
|
|
Australia
|
$
|
1,785
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,785
|
|
|
Canada
|
1,505
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,505
|
|
|
Finland
|
737
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
737
|
|
|
France
|
995
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
995
|
|
|
Germany
|
2,850
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
2,860
|
|
|
United States of America
|
535
|
|
|
2,551
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
3,103
|
|
|
Total
|
$
|
8,407
|
|
|
$
|
2,551
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
10,985
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2024
|
|
|
Federal Funds Sold
|
|
Interest-bearing
Deposits
|
|
Net Derivative Exposure (1)
|
|
Total
|
|
Australia
|
$
|
900
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
900
|
|
|
Canada
|
1,200
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
Finland
|
1,498
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,498
|
|
|
France
|
550
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
Germany
|
1,325
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
|
Japan
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
Netherlands
|
150
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
Sweden
|
200
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
United States of America
|
1,335
|
|
|
1,493
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
2,833
|
|
|
Total
|
$
|
7,158
|
|
|
$
|
1,493
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
8,668
|
|
____________
(1)Amounts do not reflect collateral; see the table under Risk Management-Credit Risk-Derivatives below for a breakdown of the credit ratings of and the Bank's credit exposure to derivative counterparties, including net exposure after collateral.
The Bank's unsecured credit exposure to non-U.S. government and non-U.S. government agency counterparties in its investment portfolio increased to $11.0 billion as of December 31, 2025, from $8.6 billion as of December 31, 2024. As of December 31, 2025, Australia & New Zealand Banking Group (Australia) and Landesbank Hessen-Thuringen Girozentrale (Germany) each accounted for more than 10 percent of this exposure and together represented 26.8 percent of the total unsecured credit exposure to non-U.S. government or non-U.S. government agency counterparties. The total unsecured credit portfolio as of December 31, 2025, consisted primarily of federal funds sold with overnight maturities.
The Bank's RMP permits the Bank to invest in U.S. government or any U.S. government agency (i.e., Fannie Mae, Freddie
Mac and Ginnie Mae) obligations including the following: (1) CMOs and REMICS that are backed by U.S. agencies; and (2) other MBS, CMOs, and REMICS that are of sufficient investment quality, which typically have the highest ratings issued by S&P or Moody's at the time of purchase. In addition to NRSRO ratings, the Bank considers a variety of credit quality factors when analyzing potential investments, such as collateral performance, marketability, asset class considerations, local and regional economic conditions, and the financial health of the underlying issuer.
The following table presents information on the credit ratings of the Bank's investments held as of December 31, 2025 (dollars in millions), based on their credit ratings as of December 31, 2025. The credit ratings reflect the lowest long-term credit ratings as reported by an NRSRO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2025
|
|
|
Investment Grade
|
|
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
AA
|
|
A
|
|
BBB
|
|
Total
|
|
Investment securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State or local housing agency debt obligations
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprises debt obligations
|
-
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury obligations
|
-
|
|
|
5,594
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
5,594
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. agency obligations-guaranteed residential
|
-
|
|
|
1,876
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,876
|
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprises residential
|
-
|
|
|
10,559
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
10,559
|
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprises commercial
|
429
|
|
|
14,772
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
15,201
|
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities
|
429
|
|
|
27,207
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
27,636
|
|
|
Total investment securities
|
429
|
|
|
33,162
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
33,591
|
|
|
Other investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
-
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
|
1,547
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
2,551
|
|
|
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
|
-
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
5,500
|
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
-
|
|
|
3,027
|
|
|
5,095
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
8,407
|
|
|
Total other investments
|
-
|
|
|
7,531
|
|
|
6,642
|
|
|
2,285
|
|
|
16,458
|
|
|
Total carrying value
|
$
|
429
|
|
|
$
|
40,693
|
|
|
$
|
6,642
|
|
|
$
|
2,285
|
|
|
$
|
50,049
|
|
Securities Purchased Under Agreements to Resell
Securities purchased under agreements to resell are considered collateralized financing arrangements and effectively represent short-term loans transacted with counterparties that the Bank considers to be of investment quality. The terms of these loans are structured such that if the fair value of the underlying securities decreases below the fair value required as collateral, the counterparty must place an equivalent amount of additional securities as collateral or remit an equivalent amount of cash. If an agreement to resell is deemed to be impaired, the difference between the fair value of the collateral and the amortized cost of the agreement is recognized in earnings.
Available-for-sale Securities
Available-for-sale securities are evaluated at the individual security level for impairment on a quarterly basis by comparing the security's fair value to its amortized cost. Accrued interest receivable is reported separately on the Statements of Condition. Impairment exists when the fair value of the investment is less than its amortized cost (i.e., in an unrealized loss position). In assessing whether a credit loss exists on an impaired security, the Bank considers whether there would be a shortfall in receiving all cash flows contractually due. In the case of U.S. obligations, they carry an explicit U.S. government guarantee and GSE securities are purchased under an assumption that the issuers' obligation to pay principal and interest on those securities will be honored, taking into account their status as GSEs. Thus, the Bank considers the risk of nonpayment to be zero. When a shortfall is considered possible, the Bank compares the present value of cash flows to be collected from the security with the amortized cost basis of the security. If the present value of cash flows is less than amortized cost, an allowance for credit losses is recorded with a corresponding adjustment to the provision (reversal) for credit losses. The allowance is limited by the amount of the unrealized loss. The allowance for credit losses excludes uncollectible accrued interest receivable, which is measured separately. If management intends to sell an impaired security classified as available-for-sale, or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before expected recovery of its amortized cost basis, any allowance for credit losses is written off and the amortized cost basis is written down to the security's fair value at the reporting date with any incremental impairment reported in earnings. If management does not intend to sell an impaired security classified as available-for-sale and it is not more likely than not that management will be required to sell the debt security, then the credit portion of the difference is recognized as an allowance for credit losses and any remaining difference between the security's fair value and amortized cost
is recorded as net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities within other comprehensive income (loss). The Bank has not established an allowance for credit loss on any of its available-for-sale securities as of December 31, 2025.
Held-to-maturity Securities
Held-to-maturity securities are evaluated quarterly for expected credit losses on a pool basis unless an individual assessment is deemed necessary because the securities do not possess similar risk characteristics. If applicable, an allowance for credit losses is recorded with a corresponding credit loss expense (or reversal of credit loss expense). The allowance for credit losses excludes uncollectible accrued interest receivable, which is measured separately.
The Bank evaluates its held-to-maturity securities for impairment on a collective, or pooled basis unless an individual assessment is deemed necessary because the securities do not possess similar risk characteristics. The Bank has not established an allowance for credit loss on any of its held-to-maturity securities as of December 31, 2025 because the securities: (1) were all highly-rated and/or had short remaining terms to maturity, (2) had not experienced, nor did the Bank expect, any payment default on the instruments, (3) in the case of U.S. obligations, they carry an explicit U.S. government guarantee such that the Bank considers the risk of nonpayment to be zero, and (4) in the case of GSE securities, they are purchased under an assumption that the issuers' obligation to pay principal and interest on those securities will be honored, taking into account their status as GSEs.
Derivatives
The Bank is subject to credit risk due to the risk of nonperformance by counterparties to its derivative transactions. The amount of credit risk on derivatives depends on the extent to which netting procedures, collateral requirements, and other credit enhancements are used and are effective in mitigating the risk. The Bank manages credit risk through credit analysis, collateral management, and other credit enhancements. The Bank is also required to follow the requirements set forth by applicable regulations.
The Bank's over-the-counter derivative transactions may either be (1) uncleared derivatives, which are executed bilaterally with a counterparty; or (2) cleared derivatives, which are cleared through a clearing agent with a Clearinghouse. Once a derivative transaction has been accepted for clearing by a Clearinghouse, the derivative transaction is novated, and the executing counterparty is replaced with the Clearinghouse as the counterparty.
For uncleared derivatives, the Bank is subject to nonperformance by counterparties. The Bank generally requires collateral on uncleared derivative transactions. A counterparty must deliver collateral to the Bank if the total market value of the Bank's exposure to that counterparty rises above a specific trigger point. As a result of these risk mitigation initiatives, the Bank does not anticipate any credit losses on its uncleared derivatives as of December 31, 2025.
If the counterparty has an NRSRO rating, the net exposure after collateral is treated as unsecured credit, consistent with the Bank's RMP and FHFA regulations. If the counterparty does not have an NRSRO rating, the Bank requires collateral for the full amount of the exposure.
For cleared derivatives, the Bank is subject to credit risk due to nonperformance by the Clearinghouse and clearing agent. The requirement that the Bank post initial and variation margin through the clearing agent, to the Clearinghouse, exposes the Bank to institutional credit risk in the event that the clearing agent or the Clearinghouse fails to meet its obligations. The use of cleared derivatives mitigates credit risk exposure because a central counterparty is substituted for individual counterparties, and collateral is posted daily for changes in the value of cleared derivatives through a clearing agent. This does introduce, however, a risk of concentration among the limited number of Clearinghouses and clearing agents. The Bank actively monitors Clearinghouses and clearing agents. An annual review of the Bank's Clearinghouses is performed, and the Bank also monitors its exposure to Clearinghouses on a monthly basis. The Bank utilized two approved Clearinghouses, CME Clearing and LCH Ltd. The Bank also monitors the clearing agents through its unsecured credit system, and the Bank subjects these clearing agents to the same limits as other bilateral derivative counterparties. The parent companies of the clearing agents are monitored through annual reviews, as well as through the Bank's daily monitoring tools, which include reviewing equity triggers, debt triggers, and credit default swap spread triggers. In addition, exposures to the clearing agents are monitored daily on a swap counterparty report. The Bank currently has two approved clearing agents, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and Goldman Sachs & Co. The Bank does not anticipate any credit losses on its cleared derivatives as of December 31, 2025.
The contractual or notional amount of derivative transactions reflects the involvement of the Bank in the various classes of financial instruments; however, the Bank's maximum credit risk with respect to derivative transactions is the estimated cost of replacing the derivative transactions if there is default, less the value of any related collateral, including initial and variation
margin. In determining maximum credit risk, the Bank considers accrued interest receivables and payables, as well as the netting requirements to net assets and liabilities.
The following table presents the derivative positions with counterparties to which the Bank had credit exposure as of December 31, 2025 (dollars in millions). The credit ratings reflect the lowest long-term credit rating by an NRSRO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2025
|
|
|
|
Notional Amount
|
|
Net Derivatives Fair Value Before Collateral
|
|
Cash Collateral Pledged To (From) Counterparty
|
|
Net Credit Exposure to Counterparties
|
|
Non-member counterparties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset positions with credit exposure:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Double-A
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
Single-A
|
|
4,568
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
(10)
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
Cleared derivatives
|
|
72,119
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
Liability positions with credit exposure:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-A
|
|
20,259
|
|
|
(105)
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
Total derivative positions with counterparties to which the Bank had credit exposure
|
|
$
|
97,021
|
|
|
$
|
(78)
|
|
|
$
|
412
|
|
|
$
|
334
|
|
Mortgage Loan Programs
The Bank seeks to manage the credit risk associated with the MPP and the MPF Program by maintaining underwriting and eligibility standards and structuring possible losses into several layers to be shared with the PFIs.
Mortgage loans purchased under the MPP and MPF Program must comply with the underwriting and eligibility standards set forth in applicable MPP guidelines or MPF Program guidelines. In both MPP and MPF Program, the Bank and PFIs share the risk of losses on mortgage loans by structuring potential losses on conventional mortgage loans into layers with respect to each master commitment and in compliance with the applicable regulations governing the purchase of mortgage loans by the Bank.
The following table presents the Bank's credit ratios for mortgage loans held for portfolio, along with each component of the ratio's calculation (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
2025
|
|
2024
|
|
Average mortgage loans held for portfolio outstanding during the year (1)
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
$
|
96
|
|
Mortgage loans held for portfolio (1)
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
$
|
89
|
|
Nonaccrual loans (1)
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
Allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans held for portfolio
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
Net charge-offs
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios (%)
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs to average mortgage loans held for portfolio outstanding during the year
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses to mortgage loans held for portfolio
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans to mortgage loans held for portfolio
|
0.82
|
|
|
2.08
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses to nonaccrual loans
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
____________
(1) Represents unpaid principal balance.
Operational Risk
Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people or systems, or from external events. Operational risk for the Bank also includes reputation and legal risks associated with business practices or market conduct that the Bank may undertake. Operational risk inherently is greatest where transaction processes include numerous processing steps, require greater subjectivity, or are non-routine. The Bank operates in a complex business environment and is subject to numerous regulatory requirements.
The Bank identifies risk through daily operational monitoring, independent reviews, and the strategic planning and risk assessment programs that both consider the operational risk ramifications of the Bank's business strategies and environment. The Bank has established comprehensive financial and operating policies and procedures to mitigate the likelihood of loss resulting from the identified operational risks. In addition, the Bank's Operational Risk Committee is responsible for overseeing the Bank's risk management policies, procedures, strategies, and activities related to operational risks, including overseeing the monitoring process and review of risk assessments. This oversight also includes compliance risk and reputational risk. The Bank effects related changes in processes, information systems, lines of communication, and other internal controls as deemed appropriate in response to identified or anticipated increases in operational risk.
The board of directors, through EROC, oversees enterprise risk management, operations, information technology, and other related matters. In addition, the Bank's internal Enterprise Risk Committee (ERC) is responsible for the management and oversight of the Bank's risk management programs and practices. Additionally, the Bank's Internal Audit department, which reports directly to the Audit Committee of the Bank's board of directors, regularly tests compliance with the policies and procedures related to managing operational risks.
Cyber-Related Risks.
The efficiencies offered by information technology (IT) are necessary components of Bank operations. The IT architecture supports multiple operating systems, database structures, and virtualized servers to support business applications that are a mixture of vendor-licensed and in-house developed. Cybersecurity threats can result in damage to the Bank's physical facilities, technology systems, and/or the Bank's intangible assets. Successful attacks can have a financial, legal, and reputational impact on the Bank as well as disrupt the Bank's ability to serve its members.
The Bank's board of directors, through EROC, oversees the major dimensions of the Bank's information technology program including management of information systems through specialized management committees and other policies and procedures to ensure alignment with the Bank's strategic plan, risk management activities, and operational performance standards, as discussed in further detail in Item 1C. Cybersecurity.
Business Risk
Business risk is the risk of an adverse effect on the Bank's profitability resulting from external factors that may occur in both the short- and the long-term. Business risk includes political, strategic, reputation, and regulatory events that are beyond the Bank's control. In particular, during 2025, and continuing into 2026, the Bank faces business risk, which may include changes in:
•the overall economy;
•the financial services industry or the Bank's competitive environment; and
•legislation, regulation, or congressional scrutiny affecting the Bank or its members.
For discussion of the Bank's competition for advances, see Item 1. Business-Competitionabove. For discussion of recent regulatory activity that may have a material impact on the Bank's operations, see Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Legislative and Regulatory Developments. The Bank attempts to mitigate these risks through long-term strategic planning and through continually monitoring economic indicators and the external environment.
Cyclicality and Seasonality
The Bank's business and the demand for advances from the Bank are generally not subject to the effects of cyclical or seasonal variations, although the Bank's advance demand may vary based upon fluctuations of its members' consumer credit liquidity needs.
Effects of Inflation
The majority of the Bank's assets and liabilities are, and will continue to be, monetary in nature. Although interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction, or to the same extent, as the prices of goods and services, higher rates of inflation generally result in corresponding increases in interest rates. Inflation, coupled with increasing interest rates, generally has the following effects on the Bank:
•the cost of the Bank's funds and operating overhead increases;
•the yield on variable-rate assets held by the Bank increases;
•the fair value of fixed-rate investments and mortgage loans held in portfolio decreases; and
•mortgage loan prepayment rates decrease and result in lower levels of mortgage loan refinance activity, which may result in the reduction of Bank advances to members as increased rates tend to slow home sales.
Conversely, lower rates of inflation or deflation have the opposite effects of the above on the Bank and its holdings.