11/05/2025 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 11/05/2025 14:59
This paper extends the analysis to the evolving debate on carbon accounting, its differences from greenhouse gas reporting, and how carbon intensity metrics for climate-trade policies connect to established practices in environmental product declarations and life-cycle accounting.
Date
Nov. 5, 2025
Authors
Milan Elkerbout, Katarina Nehrkorn, and Brandon Holmes
Publication
Working PaperReading time
1 minuteThis is the second Resources for the Future (RFF) working paper on interoperability of carbon intensity quantification methods. To read our first RFF paper on interoperability, see https://www.rff.org/publications/working-papers/trade-friendly-climate-policies-the-promise-of-interoperability/. This paper connects the ongoing debate on carbon accounting methods with existing practices in lifecycle accounting and environmental product declarations. A case study compares carbon intensity quantification methods across the EU carbon border adjustment mechanisms, the US Environmental Protection Agency's labeling program, and an International Trade Commission study on steel and aluminum carbon intensities. This paper finds that there may be legitimate areas where product-level carbon intensity accounting choices may differ. Nevertheless, improved interoperability could still be possible by discussing and recognizing trade-offs between physical properties and policy incentives.
PDF - 465.3 KB
Milan Elkerbout
Fellow; Director, International Climate Policy Initiative
Milan Elkerbout
Katarina Nehrkorn
Research Associate
Katarina Nehrkorn
Brandon Holmes
Research Analyst
Brandon Holmes is a research analyst at RFF.
Trade-Friendly Climate Policies: The Promise of "Interoperability"
When designing trade-related climate policies, there are a number of areas policymakers can consider to build interoperability and avoid extra administrative costs and barriers.
Measuring Emissions from Liquefied Natural Gas, with Arvind Ravikumar
Arvind Ravikumar discusses recent changes to federal methane emissions regulations, responses to these changes in the private sector, and ways to reduce methane emissions from natural gas production.
A Conversation on Climate Week
Climate Week NYC is a unique forum to discuss the future of climate and energy policy, make connections, and reflect on the changing centers of climate action. In this blog post, several Climate Week attendees from RFF discuss what they learned.
Investing in US Climate Technology Competitiveness
Resources for the Future is investing in research that tracks US economic productivity and competitiveness against other nations, across a range of emitting sectors, and across varying rates of clean technology innovation.