AI transforms audience monetisation with smarter paywalls, stronger revenue

News publishers face a delicate balancing act: They must grow their subscriber base while maximising advertising revenue. Yet many still rely on static paywalls that treat all visitors the same, overlooking a critical opportunity to tailor experiences based on diverse user behaviours and needs.

The core challenge is a lack of visibility into the multiple revenue streams at play. Static paywalls fail to account for key signals, such as subscriber likelihood, expected retention, and advertising value, as well as the trade-offs between them. As a result, publishers not only miss out on meaningful subscription growth but also leave substantial revenue on the table.

AI offers an opportunity to create a paywall model that takes advantage of both ad value and user propensity to subscribe.

In this article, we explore the key strategies behind dynamic paywall optimisation, which combines ad value and user propensity to subscribe, unlocking greater revenue potential.

Precision targeting with differentiated paywall logic

Recognising that not all users and content hold the same value underscores the importance of a more nuanced approach to audience monetisation. By segmenting audiences based on their individual ad value and content engagement, publishers can tailor their approach more strategically.

Visitors who fall within an audience segment with high advertising value, for example, can be monetised through advertising revenue. In contrast, other segments are more likely to receive registration walls or targeted subscription offers.

This approach forms the foundation of differentiated paywall logic, enabling publishers to capture the full potential of each revenue stream without compromising one for the sake of the other.

The key, therefore, lies in creating a fluid and dynamic system aligning with the varying monetisation potential of content and users, rather than relying on a one-size-fits-all model.

The trade-off: subscription acquisition vs. ad yield

Publishers are understandably cautious about aggressively marketing subscriptions with restrictive paywalls. They fear limiting audience reach and brand awareness.

The challenge becomes clearer when advertising revenue is factored into the algorithms determining paywall decisions for each visitor. Paywall friction tends to affect open programmatic inventory, where CPMs are lower, and the impact of a paywall intercept is less costly in terms of lost advertising revenue.

Still, there are instances where paywalls can affect valuable advertising inventory, which can offset incremental revenue from new subscriptions with the loss of direct-sold advertising revenue.

A dynamic paywall model can quantify this complex trade-off by continuously evaluating expected revenue from subscriptions and advertising.

For instance, Sophi's AI models utilise a variable time horizon that can flex throughout the year. Publishers can prioritise in-year (or in-quarter) advertising revenue when needed or shift their focus toward long-term subscriber lifetime value when volume growth is the primary goal. This level of flexibility helps avoid revenue cannibalisation while efficiently expanding the subscriber base.

Advanced integration with Google Ad Manager

As paywall strategies evolve, integrating ad technology and data with audience analytics becomes crucial for maximising the full potential of both subscriptions and ad revenue.

We have observed B2B and B2C technology stacks remain separate in most organisations. To address this, we developed integrations with tools like Google Ad Manager to provide AI models with data at the user-page level. This empowers dynamic, data-driven decisions optimising revenue across both channels.

Building on this foundation, combining financial modeling with real-time experimentation enables the creation of a closed-loop optimisation system.

This approach allows for measurable increases in net subscription revenue while maintaining high-value ad impressions. The ability to dynamically balance ad value with user propensity marks a pivotal shift in digital audience monetisation, leading to more precise decisions that enhance revenue across multiple channels.

Quantifying the opportunity: a 20% revenue lift

The integration of advertising opportunity cost into dynamic paywall decision-making offers a deeper understanding of balancing subscription and ad revenue. Sites incorporating both user and content propensity models, alongside expected ad revenue, are beginning to see increases of up to 20% in total revenue.

The key lies in thoughtful allocation. By serving more paywall intercepts on pages with lower ad value and possibly lower propensity-to-subscribe visitors, while keeping premium inventory open for higher CPM potential, publishers can avoid a significant decline in the conversion rate of those intercepts.

This approach increases new subscribers while minimising lost advertising revenue. Mather has modeled this allocation in collaboration with news publishers, and we are currently testing this approach.

In our data, we find this optimised allocation increases the number of paywall intercepts to a greater degree than the observed reduction in conversion rate. The net effect on revenue depends on several factors, including the sell-through rate, direct CPM (cost per thousand), programmatic CPM, conversion rate from paywall intercepts, and the lifetime value of subscribers acquired through the paywall.

The path forward: smarter monetisation at scale

AI-driven paywall optimisation isn't just a tactic - it's a strategic shift. As the news industry evolves, success no longer hinges on choosing between ads and subscriptions but on seamlessly orchestrating both through intelligent automation.

By combining customer lifetime value (CLV) insights, ad value modeling, and dynamic decision-making, publishers can uncover untapped revenue opportunities and establish a more resilient digital business model.

AI-powered tools, such as Sophi's Paywall Intelligence Platform, are becoming an important element of a publisher's monetisation strategy. Thanks to their ability to analyse real-time data on both subscription and ad revenue, they can intelligently determine the best paywall strategy for each user and pageview.

Such dynamic, data-driven models ensure a seamless balance between short-term revenue and long-term growth, empowering publishers to maximise both without compromising either.

YOU MUST BE A MEMBER TO ACCESS THIS CONTENT

Become An INMA Member or Log In

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

About the Authors

Michael O'Neill is founder of Sophi at Mather in Toronto, Canada. Michael can be reached at moneill@mathereconomics.com.

Matt Lindsay is president at Mather Economics, based in Atlanta, Georgia, USA. He can be reached at matt@mathereconomics.com.

Related Articles