06/03/2025 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 06/04/2025 09:01
State, local, tribal and territorial leaders use the mitigation planning process to understand their natural hazard risks and develop long-term strategies to reduce risk, using a wide range of resources. Hazard mitigation is most effective when it is based on a comprehensive, long-term mitigation plan that is developed before a disaster. State mitigation plans demonstrate the state's commitment to reducing the impacts of natural hazards on its populations, buildings and infrastructure. This plan reduces risk to key state assets over the long term. It also provides local jurisdictions with critical information and guidance regarding the state's risks, capabilities, priorities and action plans. These can help the jurisdictions develop their own hazard mitigation plans. States are responsible for:
A state must have a mitigation plan to receive certain kinds of non-emergency disaster assistance. These include FEMA's Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) programs, Public Assistance funds (non-emergency permanent work), Fire Management Assistance Grants, and Rehabilitation of High-Hazard Potential Dam grants. For more details, visit Mitigation Planning and Grants.
State mitigation plans follow the same basic formula: organize the planning process and resources; assess risks; develop a mitigation strategy; and adopt and implement the plan. Because state plans set the overall direction for mitigation statewide, they have a number of required elements. These are described in the table below.
The state must also meet specific requirements to be eligible for funding under the High Hazard Potential Dam grant program or to obtain the enhanced status necessary to receive additional Hazard Mitigation Grant Program funding. Enhanced status denotes the state has developed a comprehensive mitigation program and is capable of managing increased funding for its mitigation goals. For detailed guidance on the components of a FEMA-approved state hazard mitigation plan, please see FEMA's State Mitigation Planning Policy Guide.
Element | Overall Intent |
Planning Process | Demonstrates a deliberative approach to how the plan ;was prepared, who participated, and how decisions were made. |
Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (HIRA) | Describes what hazards may affect the state, where they may occur and how frequently they may happen to identify risk-informed mitigation actions.The HIRA must account for changes in population and land use. |
State Mitigation Capabilities | Documents the state's capabilities to reduce risk and increase resilience using a wide range of programs, policies and initiatives. |
Mitigation Strategy | Guides the development and implementation of hazard mitigation. This involves setting goals, identifying actions and detailing an action plan that reflects the state's risks and priorities. |
Local Planning Coordination and Capability Building | Shows how the state supports local and, as applicable, tribal jurisdictions' capabilities to mitigate hazards. Shows how the state directs resources to support effective mitigation planning and investment decisions. |
Review, Evaluation and Implementation | Establishes a process for keeping the plan current. Ensures that the plan is implemented overtime and evaluates feedback on the state's progress on its mitigation strategy. |
Adoption and Assurances | Demonstrates the state's commitment to mitigation planning and implementation. Confirms that the state will comply with applicable federal statutes and regulations. |
FEMA provides a variety of guidance, resources and training to help states develop hazard mitigation plans.