10/20/2026 | Press release | Archived content
Summary: Substation design has come a long way over the last 50 years. A big focus in the 21st century is resilience. When it comes to designing and building control houses, resilience is non-negotiable. The modern grid demands it.
The reliability of North America's electrical grid has never been more vital. Between extreme weather events, increased growth, and evolving physical and cyber threats, the modern grid is under tremendous pressure. Substation engineers cannot afford to focus all their attention on transformers and circuit breakers. They need to give equal attention to substation control houses.
The control house is the operational nerve center of any high-voltage substation. It houses critical protective relays and communication systems. It is home to battery systems, automation controls, and the enclosures that safeguard electronics designed to monitor and direct power flow across the grid. Even the slightest control house failure can paralyze an entire substation. And if that happens, widespread outages and expensive equipment damage are likely.
One of our tasks here at Commonwealth is to work with utilities, property owners, and substation designers to prevent catastrophic failures. We do so by incorporating control house resilience into substation design.
Building a better and stronger energy infrastructure requires that everyone involved be on the same page. In the context of control house design, this means distinguishing between two closely related concepts: reliability and resilience. They are not the same.
Within the context of building substations, resilience is applied to control systems that must remain functional even during severe disturbances. Resilience allows operators to restore power safely and quickly following any type of incident.
The modern control center is a far cry from its 20th-century counterpart. It has to be. The 21st-century grid faces a combination of operational challenges that make control house resilience a top priority.
For better or worse, we have locked ourselves into a system that is now at the mercy of the grid. If it goes down, daily life crashes. The goal of designing and building resilient substation control houses is to reduce the risks of grid failure as much as possible.
The big question for substation engineers is what constitutes a resilient control house. Resilience isn't quantified as a singular characteristic. It is actually a collection of things that make control structures tougher, more robust, and easier to maintain. From our perspective, there are four key markers of control house resilience.
1. Hardened Structures
A control house's physical envelope must withstand significant localized forces without compromising the electronic equipment housed inside. This plays out in multiple practical ways:
Physical hardening prevents failures resulting from weather events and physical attacks. But there is a lot more to control house resilience.
2. Environmental Control and HVAC Redundancy
The highly sensitive relays, microprocessors, and battery racks found in the modern control house must be protected against temperature extremes and environmental contamination. That means designing control houses with positive-pressure filtration systems that keep out everything from outdoor dust to smoke from nearby wildfires. Meanwhile, dual, self-contained HVAC units provide redundancy when temperatures get too hot or cold.
3. DC and Auxiliary Power Systems
Redundancy is also a concern for control house power. Deploying redundant DC battery systems with independent chargers ensures continuous breaker-tripping capabilities. Uninterruptible power supplies are deployed to back up essential communications systems and emergency lighting.
4. Physical Threat Mitigation
Under NERC CIP-014 standards, physical perimeter security extends all the way to the control house building. Once again, there are practical implications:
Putting up a traditional control house is fairly easy. Substation designers and builders have been doing it for decades. As for building a control house that is truly resilient, the job is never easy.
Resilient control house design can be a big ask among asset owners who assume that it requires customized and expensive engineering. While it is true that resilience demands more forethought than standard minimum-code construction, achieving it efficiently comes down to finding that perfect balance between complexity and cost containment.
Here at Commonwealth, we help engineers and builders find that balance. It is possible to build resilience into a substation control house without blowing the budget.
What is the big difference between reliability and resilience?
Reliability pertains to keeping a substation operating even when routine and expected problems arise. Resilience pertains to protecting a substation and its equipment when major incidents increase the risk of catastrophic failure.
Why does HVAC redundancy matter to the modern control house?
Today's control houses must protect sensitive electronic equipment that wasn't in play 50 years ago. Since electronics are susceptible to temperature extremes, HVAC redundancy is necessary to keep things running.
Can modular control houses be deployed without sacrificing resilience?
Yes, if they are designed and constructed properly. The modular model is attractive because it reduces field labor and eliminates weather delays during construction.
How does NERC CIP-014 play into physical control house design?
NERC CIP-014 standards directly impact design through mandated physical security risk assessments for critical transmission substations. Put simply, a compliant control house must meet physical safety standards that weren't even considered decades ago.
Back to All Insights