09/26/2025 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 09/26/2025 09:29
Sep 26, 2025
Categories:
Publications
Authors:
Jeffrey N. Lindemann
Most larger employers are familiar with the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining and Notification (WARN) Act, which requires covered employers (generally, those having 100 or more full-time employees) to provide 60 days' notice when a "plant closing" or "mass layoff" occurs. The federal WARN Act requires Ohio employers to provide the required notice to employees or their unions (for employees who are represented); the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services (ODJFS); and the chief elected official of the applicable local unit of government. Recently, the Ohio legislature enacted Ohio Revised Code Section 4113.31, which is commonly referred to as the "Ohio WARN Act." The Ohio WARN Act becomes effective on September 29, 2025.
The Ohio WARN Act requires additional notice information relating to plant closings or mass layoffs beyond what is required by the federal WARN Act. Specifically, in addition to notifying employees and/or their unions, the ODJFS, and the local unit of government, the Ohio WARN Act requires that the chief elected official in the applicable county also be notified. Perhaps, more importantly, the content of the notices must include more details, as set forth below.
The federal WARN Act requires that a notice to a union representing affected employees include:
The Ohio WARN Act adds the following requirements to the union notice:
The federal WARN Act requires that a notice to employees not represented by a union include:
The Ohio WARN Act adds the following requirements to the individual employee notice:
The federal WARN Act requires that a notice to government officials include:
The Ohio WARN Act adds the following requirements to the government officials' notice:
Regarding the dissemination of notices, the Ohio WARN Act seems intended to track the requirements of the federal WARN Act. The Ohio WARN Act adopts the federal WARN Act's definitions of "employer," "mass layoff," and "plant closing," and the statute specifically provides that, "An employer in [Ohio] shall comply with all requirements in the [federal] WARN Act [and its regulations]. The requirements specified in this section do not establish a different standard than that established by federal statutes and regulations." R.C. 4113.31(B). However, in another section, the Ohio WARN Act states that notice is required when an Ohio employer lays off 50 or more employees at a single site of employment during any 30-day period, yet without reference to the federal WARN Act's additional caveat that for a layoff of more than 50 employees to require notice, the employees must comprise at least 33% of the workforce (unless 500 or more employees are affected). Thus, there is a conflict between the Ohio WARN Act's incorporation of the federal WARN Act's definition of "mass layoff" and this other section describing notice. The Ohio WARN Act provides that the ODJFS director may issue additional guidance. Hopefully, the above issue soon will be addressed.
Covered employers in Ohio considering plant closures or mass layoffs must comply with both the Ohio WARN Act and the federal WARN Act, which can get complicated. Both statutes spawn complicated, highly fact-intensive questions, including: when and whether employees are countable towards applicable thresholds; exceptions for faltering companies, unforeseen business circumstances, and natural disasters; addressing remote employees; and aggregating separate layoffs. As a best practice, these issues should be fully addressed before effectuating a plant closing or mass layoff.
If you have any questions about the Ohio WARN Act or the federal WARN Act, please contact the author or any member of Frost Brown Todd's Labor and Employment Practice Group.
Subscribe to receive email updates and choose your topics.