Innovaccer Inc

09/28/2026 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 09/28/2026 03:12

Why Primary Care Is the Most Underfunded Lever in Saudi Healthcare

I have heard the same observation from senior physicians across Riyadh and Jeddah, each time phrased differently but pointing to the same reality. Patients arrive at specialist clinics and hospital emergency departments with conditions that should have been caught months earlier. Uncontrolled HbA1c levels. Hypertension that was never followed up. Early-stage kidney disease that progressed silently because no one was tracking the trend.


It is not that these patients were absent from the system. Most of them had visited a primary care centre at some point. The problem is what happened, or did not happen, after that visit.

Where the money actually goes

Saudi Arabia spent more than $58 billion on healthcare in 2024, the highest in the GCC. That is a serious investment by any measure. But the distribution of that spending tells a different story.


79% of public healthcare funding in Saudi Arabia is directed toward government hospitals. That figure sits against an OECD benchmark average of 39%, and countries like Germany and Mexico, where less than 30% of health spending goes to hospital care. Meanwhile, preventive care receives only 3.8% of total healthcare funds, significantly below the Asia-Pacific average of 8%, and far behind the United Kingdom at 12% and Denmark at 9%.

Read those numbers again. A country where chronic disease accounts for the majority of the disease burden is directing less than 4 cents in every healthcare dollar toward preventing it.

Evidence suggests that every dollar invested in effective public health programs at the community level can yield future savings of about $5.60 in healthcare costs. The return on primary care and prevention investment is not marginal. It is structural.

The system is built backwards

The Kingdom has over 2,000 primary healthcare centres. That is a meaningful physical footprint. But infrastructure and investment are not the same thing. A primary care centre that is understaffed, under-equipped, and unable to access a patient's longitudinal data from other facilities is not functioning as the first line of defence that chronic disease management requires.


Current hospital admission rates in Saudi Arabia stand at 113 per 1,000 population, above global averages. That number is partly a clinical story and partly a structural one. When primary care cannot effectively manage a diabetic patient over time, the endpoint of that failure is often a hospital admission. The hospital absorbs the cost. The hospital gets the funding. And the cycle continues.

This is the logical trap of a hospital-centric financing model: the more underfunded primary care is, the more patients escalate to hospital-level care, which reinforces the perception that hospital capacity is what needs expanding. The real shortage is not beds. It is proactive, continuous, data-informed primary care.

What Vision 2030 says versus what the numbers show

Vision 2030 is explicit about the direction. The Health Sector Transformation Program aims to rebalance the system toward primary care and prevention. The Kingdom is undergoing major reform to shift from a hospital-centric model to a value-based system centered on primary care, with health clusters designed to integrate primary, secondary, and specialist care into coordinated regional networks.


The policy intent is right. The financing has not fully followed.

The new risk-adjusted capitation model being introduced through the Centre for National Health Insurance aims to incentivise investment in primary care, early intervention, and chronic disease management to avoid costly emergency and inpatient treatments. Projections suggest this shift could save between SAR 18 billion and SAR 30 billion annually by 2035. That is not a marginal efficiency gain. It is a system-level correction.

But payment reform alone will not close the gap. The data infrastructure has to move in parallel.

The data problem inside the primary care problem

A primary care physician managing a panel of 1,500 patients with hypertension, diabetes, and obesity cannot do that effectively with a paper register or a disconnected EMR. They need to know which patients have not attended a follow-up in six months. Which ones have a deteriorating HbA1c trend. Which ones stopped filling their prescriptions. Without that visibility, primary care becomes reactive rather than proactive. It handles today's presenting complaint. It does not manage tomorrow's complication.


This is why the data fragmentation problem discussed in previous weeks and the primary care funding problem are not separate issues. They amplify each other. Underfunded primary care cannot build the data infrastructure it needs. Fragmented data makes it impossible for primary care to perform the population health function that justifies greater investment.

Breaking that cycle requires both: sustained investment in primary care capacity and the clinical intelligence layer that makes that capacity effective.

What the region can learn from its own data

A UNDP synthesis report costing primary healthcare across all six GCC countries found that the programmes contributing most to the total cost of primary care services were general practice and noncommunicable diseases. The burden is concentrated exactly where prevention would have the greatest impact. And prevention delivered at the primary care level is dramatically cheaper than the same conditions managed at hospital level.


Saudi Arabia has the ambition, the policy framework, and the financial capacity to make primary care the genuine centre of its health system. The clusters are being built. The insurance reform is underway. The direction is correct.

What is needed now is for the investment to match the intent. Not just in infrastructure, but in staffing, data systems, and the clinical workflows that turn a primary care visit into the start of a managed, continuous relationship with a patient's health.
The hospital will always be necessary. But in a system serious about outcomes, it should be the last resort, not the default.
Innovaccer Inc published this content on September 28, 2026, and is solely responsible for the information contained herein. Distributed via Public Technologies (PUBT), unedited and unaltered, on September 28, 2026 at 09:13 UTC. If you believe the information included in the content is inaccurate or outdated and requires editing or removal, please contact us at [email protected]