03/19/2026 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 03/19/2026 07:23
Question: What drove JNJ stock up 70% since early 2025?
The short answer: investor sentiment did most of the work, with actual business performance playing a supporting role.
JNJ went from ~$140 early last year to $237 today - a 70% gain. When you decompose it, 60 percentage points came from P/S multiple expansion (from 3.8x to 6.1x), and only about 6 points came from revenue growth. In other words, for every dollar of value created, roughly 90 cents was the market paying more for the same earnings stream, not the earnings stream itself growing. That's a significant distinction.
Image by Renate Köppel from Pixabay
Did the business actually grow? Yes. Johnson & Johnson's revenue rose from $88.8B in 2024 to $94.2B in 2025 - a 6% increase. Shares outstanding were essentially flat, so revenue per share grew by the same amount.
What drove the revenue growth? Both the engines: Innovative Medicine and MedTech.
On the pharma side, growth was driven primarily by DARZALEX, CARVYKTI, ERLEADA, and RYBREVANT in Oncology, TREMFYA and SIMPONI in Immunology, and SPRAVATO in Neuroscience - though this was partially offset by roughly 1,040 basis points of headwind from STELARA biosimilar competition. That's notable: STELARA's patent expiry was a meaningful drag, and the rest of the portfolio had to run hard just to offset it.
On the devices side, MedTech grew 5.4% operationally, driven by electrophysiology products and Abiomed in Cardiovascular, and wound closure products in General Surgery.
So the revenue growth was real and broad-based - but at 6%, it's not the kind of explosive top-line expansion that typically justifies a 60% multiple re-rating on its own.
If revenue only grew 6%, why did investors pay 60% more for each dollar of revenue?
Three structural shifts changed how the market thinks about JNJ as a business:
So why didn't the stock go even further? The talc litigation remains a persistent discount on the multiple.
Over 67,000 plaintiffs are still suing J&J over talc-related cancer claims. Following the rejection of its third bankruptcy attempt in March 2025, J&J returned to the tort system - keeping a cloud of uncertainty over the stock. JNJ's forward P/E sits at a discount to historical averages specifically because of this litigation overhang.
What does resolution mean for the stock? Potentially a lot. Analysts widely view removing this legal cloud as the primary catalyst for a significant further re-rating. In other words, the 60% multiple expansion that's already happened may not be the end of the story - it's arguably the story with a known discount still baked in.
JNJ's 70% run since the end of 2024 is predominantly a valuation story, not an earnings story. We saw this coming and talked about it in Q3 last year - Is Rerating Around The Corner For Johnson & Johnson Stock? See, the business grew - oncology and MedTech delivered, acquisitions added credibility to the pipeline, and margins are improving. But the real driver was a structural re-rating as the market recalibrated what J&J is now: a focused, high-margin, innovation-led healthcare company, not the sprawling consumer-pharma conglomerate it was. The revenue growth validated the thesis; the multiple expansion was the thesis.
Still unsure of JNJ stock? Consider the portfolio approach.
Individual stocks are unpredictable. A smart portfolio helps you invest, limits downside shocks, and provides upside exposure.
Why settle for average market returns? The Trefis High Quality (HQ) Portfolio invests in a diverse group of 30 stocks that have collectively delivered stronger upside with reduced volatility compared to the broader indices. Discover the methodology behind these smoother, higher returns by checking the HQ Portfolio performance data.
Invest with Trefis Market-Beating Portfolios
See all Trefis Price Estimates