03/16/2026 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 03/16/2026 09:58
Section 301 investigations on March 11 and 12, 2026, targeting overcapacity in manufacturing sectors across 16 key trading partners and forced labor-related import enforcement failures across 60 economies. These actions represent the broadest Section 301 activity since the initial China 301 actions in 2018 and signal a renewed U.S. strategy to reconstruct a long term tariff architecture following the recent termination of IEEPA based tariffs.
Both investigations include near term opportunities for public comments and carry high risk of future increases in duties, including the potential for new, expanded, or country specific tariffs under Section 301.
On March 11, 2026, USTR self initiated investigations into acts, policies, and practices related to structural excess capacity and production across the following economies:
|
· Thailand · South Korea · Vietnam · Taiwan · Bangladesh · Mexico · Japan · India |
USTR notes that these countries' manufacturing output exceeds domestic demand, resulting in persistent trade surpluses and displacement of U.S. manufacturing investment. Key sectors called out include (but are not limited to):
|
· Electronics · Machinery · Glass · Cement · Solar modules · Robotics · Transportation equipment |
Public Comment Opportunity:
Risk Assessment: Increased Tariff Exposure
Given the breadth of economies and sectors involved, importers should expect elevated tariff risk across wide product categories, particularly where global oversupply is prevalent.
On March 12, 2026, USTR launched a separate set of Section 301(b) investigations into 60 countries, examining whether governments have failed to impose and effectively enforce bans on the importation of goods produced with forced labor. The list includes major U.S. trading partners such as:
|
· Qatar · Saudi Arabia · Israel · China · Russia · Vietnam · Brazil · Switzerland · And many others |
USTR emphasizes that inadequate forced labor enforcement may grant foreign producers artificial cost advantages, harming U.S. businesses, workers, and compliant importers.
Public Comment Opportunity:
Risk Assessment: Potential New Forced Labor Tariff Measures
USTR may pursue:
Given the scale of the probe, even industries without current forced labor flags may see increased compliance scrutiny or tariff exposure.
We recommend that importers:
SEKO will continue to provide timely updates as more information becomes available.
SEKO's trade and compliance experts are available to help assess impacts, review classifications, and map out mitigation strategies. Please contact your SEKO representative directly or email us at [email protected].