Applovin Corporation

02/20/2026 | Press release | Archived content

Designing creatives for a full attention environment

When our engineering team began building a performance product for web brands, one of the first questions we asked was simple: what does effective creative look like in this environment?

For over a decade, we built for gaming advertisers. Gaming studios intuitively understand our inventory. They build for the same audience, inside the same apps, in formats designed for the same attention context.

Web brands come from a different world. Their creative instincts were formed on social platforms, where users scroll quickly and attention must be captured instantly. That paradigm does not transfer cleanly to Axon. From the start, we knew we needed a form factor built specifically for the mobile app environment and tuned to how web brands sell.

This post explains how creative for web brands in a mobile app environment differs from social, and how advertisers can use those differences to drive better outcomes on Axon.

Understanding the attention context

On Axon, ads operate in a high attention environment.

A fullscreen video appears roughly once every two to five minutes of gameplay. Because ads are less frequent relative to the entertainment, users are more likely to focus when one appears. Spend is split nearly evenly between two placements:

Interstitial: Shown at natural breaks in gameplay. Users must watch at least five seconds before they can skip.

Rewarded: Opt-in. A user chooses to watch in exchange for an in-game reward. Once the video begins, it plays through its duration, up to 60 seconds.

These structural differences fundamentally change how effective creative is built.

A full funnel channel requires full funnel creative

The combination of extended watch time and a highly predictive model allows brands to reach users across the entire purchase journey.

On many social platforms, skippable formats favor users who are already somewhat in-market. Cold audiences scroll past unfamiliar brands, and the algorithm reinforces that behavior.

As Philip Buerger, Co-Founder and President at TubeScience, recently explained:

"In paid social the ads are all skippable, so the algorithm has to find consumers that are already warm and in-market to ensure they don't just scroll past the ad. You don't get the opportunity to reach the coldest audience and make a pitch. AppLovin, because of the form factor, gives brands that opportunity and isn't just a paid social bottom of funnel channel."

That distinction matters.

On Axon, brands can introduce themselves to cold audiences and make a full case for why they matter. The advertisers that scale most effectively invest in longer-form storytelling that clearly communicates brand, product, and value.

Longer videos outperform

Social has conditioned advertisers to think in very short increments. On Axon, that mindset often limits performance.

Because interstitial placements offer extended viewing time and rewarded placements are unskippable for up to 60 seconds, short ads frequently underutilize available attention.

Our data consistently shows that longer videos outperform shorter ads, particularly in rewarded placements.

Applovin Corporation published this content on February 20, 2026, and is solely responsible for the information contained herein. Distributed via Public Technologies (PUBT), unedited and unaltered, on March 04, 2026 at 20:22 UTC. If you believe the information included in the content is inaccurate or outdated and requires editing or removal, please contact us at [email protected]