Home Secretary Oral Statement on National Security

Since the House last sat, we have received a reminder of the threats ranged against this country. This has included the danger posed by extremists and terrorists, but it has also comprised threats posed by foreign powers seeking to undermine our nation's security.

These threats have targeted people, businesses and critical infrastructure, but above all else, they are attacks on our values and our way of life. The first duty of government is the security of the nation - so today I will update the House on our response to these threats, and how we are acting to keep our country and our citizens safe.

I will start with the threat posed by terrorists and extremists, and I know one case, in particular, will be on the minds of many in the House today. It is now three months since the murder of Ann Widdecombe at her home in Devon. We continue to mourn her loss. On the 2nd of October, the suspect was charged with a terrorism offence, including preparing an act of terror against the leader of Reform UK, the Honourable Member for Clacton. I know that news will have been deeply distressing for the Honourable Member. So, may I say to him, and to his family, they have my profoundest sympathies at what must be an awful time. As I have said before, an attack on any one of us is an attack on us all.

I know other Members - as well as people outside of this House - have recently been contacted by the police in connection with this case. To all of those affected, may I offer the same sympathies and solidarity as I do to the Honourable Member for Clacton. At times like these, we must stand together as one House. For those who serve, politics is a calling - robust debate and criticism are part of this job, threats, abuse and violence are not. Today, as on so many other days, we remember Ann Widdecombe, Sir David Amess and Jo Cox - three beloved colleagues, and three champions of our democracy. We owe it to them, and to everyone who believes in a fair and open country, to ensure those who serve, at all levels, receive the protection they deserve.

We must first ensure that every opportunity was taken in this particular case to stop this attacker. The Independent Office of Police Conduct is investigating the response to an attempted break-in at the Honourable Member's home last year. I have asked them to conduct this investigation both thoroughly and swiftly, and we expect it to conclude early next year. I would caution everyone not to pre-empt that investigation. Regardless of the outcome of that investigation, it is clear there is insufficient protection for those who serve. I can therefore announce today that I will expand, with immediate effect, police support to political figures who are not currently Members of Parliament. This will include former Members of Parliament, peers and party spokespeople, giving them access to a named police officer, as well as help with wider security measures.

But we must go further, so today, I also announce an independent, root-and-branch review of the protective security provided by the state to those in public life. This review will be led by Sir Stephen Lovegrove, the former national security adviser. It will examine protective security from every angle, including physical threats, online risks, and the dangers posed within our more polarised society. It will hear directly from ministers, Members of Parliament and other high-profile people in public life, it will report within six months, and will complement Sir Robert Buckland's ongoing review into the killing of Sir David Amess. This is rightly an independent review, but my commitment is that its findings must and will lead to tangible change, and that the state's resources will be rebalanced to protect those people and places that need it most.

The terrorist threat is not ranged only at those who serve in public life. In recent days, we marked the first anniversary of the terror attack at the Heaton Park synagogue. On that awful day in October of last year, as our Jewish community celebrated Yom Kippur, two brave men - Melvin Cravitz and Adrian Daulby - lost their lives, and three others were seriously injured. What happened that day must be fully understood. So, as requested by the coroner, I can today announce a public inquiry into the deaths of Mr Cravitz and Mr Daulby. This will ensure that all evidence can be heard, including any sensitive national security material that could not otherwise be fully heard in the coroner's court.

Tragically, Heaton Park was just one of a series of attacks on our Jewish community. In the year since, they have included: the stabbing of two Jewish men in Golders Green, north London, with a trial now set for March 2027; a failed attack on the Israeli Embassy, for which the attacker was last week jailed for 20 years; a spate of arson attacks across North London; and, last month, just hours before Yom Kippur began, a foiled but potentially lethal plot on the Jewish community in Manchester. In this case, two men, both Iranian nationals, have now been charged with terrorism offences. I pay tribute to the police and the security services for what was a long-running investigation, conducted with their customary professionalism and skill.

Faced with the threat posed to our Jewish community, we have increased funding to the police by an additional £250 million to boost police presence in key Jewish areas and tackle antisemitism on our streets. But I know we cannot simply build higher walls around our Jewish community and expect them to live in fear. So we must root out the evil of antisemitism wherever it lurks in society. This Government is committed to that effort, tackling antisemitism wherever it is found: be it online, in our schools and universities, in our public services, or on our streets.

The threat posed to our Jewish community shows us how the lines are increasingly blurring between extremism and state threats. We know the Iranian state is targeting our Jewish community. Earlier this year, the Islamic Movement of Companions of the Right (or the IMCR), claimed responsibility for the arson attacks in north London. We know that members of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (or the IRGC) were behind that group, and almost certainly directed its attacks across Europe. This speaks to a wider trend. States like Iran are using proxies to conduct hostile activity here in Britain. They pay criminals or exploit naive volunteers, attacking our country and its citizens while maintaining an air of plausible deniability.

It is a brazen threat, but it is one that we are alert to, and will not tolerate. That is why, this summer, we fast-tracked the National Security (State Threats) Act through

parliament. This created stronger powers and tougher punishment to deal with state-backed threats to domestic security, and under these new powers, we have designated both the IMCR and the IRGC.

This brings us to the recent events at RAF Fairford. As the Prime Minister has said, our assessment is that it is highly likely to have been coordinated by a known individual based in Iran, and almost certainly directed by Iran's IRGC. The Foreign Secretary has today summoned the Iranian Ambassador. He will condemn Iran's continued attempts to undermine our safety. We are also sanctioning two individuals involved in conducting espionage and attacks on behalf of the Government of Iran in Europe and the US, and we will not hesitate to take further action to restrict Iran's capacity to threaten international security.

The threat is not contained to Iran, of course. As the invasion of Ukraine enters a fifth winter, the Kremlin continues to lash out at European countries. Together with the EU, we attributed an attack on Poland's energy grid last December to Russia, which could have caused half a million citizens to lose electricity. Similarly, we are acting against the threat on our shores. Last month, a British man was charged under the National Security Act over alleged contact with Russia's military intelligence agency, and, in recent days, a Royal Navy sailor, accused of spying on behalf of Russia, has been charged under the same Act.

We remain vigilant to threats posed by China too. MI5 recently warned universities and academics to cut ties with the China General Technology Research Institute. This group had been funding research in the UK with the "primary purpose" of improving China's espionage operations. Those who continue to work with this group will face criminal charges for aiding a foreign state, and lengthy prison sentences as a result.

The threats we face today are complex and often interconnected. They target communities and citizens, the critical infrastructure that we depend on, and the institutions and individuals that make up our democracy. Our response to this growing threat is, rightly, multi-faceted.

We are tackling extremism in our communities and in the online world. In "Protecting What Matters", our social cohesion plan, we set out a range of measures to tackle this threat, including banning those who seek to come to this country and spread hatred, and committing to publishing an annual State of Extremism report, which will identify the threats we face, and crucially equip frontline professionals to counter it.

We are also adapting to the changing nature of the violent threat that we face. Following the horrors of Southport, we have taken action to curb the threat posed by individuals fixated on violence. This has included strengthening the handling of repeat Prevent referrals, and making it clear that referrals can be made to Prevent without a clearly identifiable ideology. The Online Safety Act has also ensured thousands of services now have stronger age checks and safety measures.

In addressing the threat posed by states, make no mistake: our police and security services are on permanent watch. Since 2023, more than 23 people have been charged under the National Security Act, leading to five convictions and totalling more than 48 years' imprisonment so far, including 18 years for two men convicted of

spying for China. We have imposed more than 4,000 sanctions linked to Russia and Iran, and we have placed both on the enhanced tier of the Foreign Influence Registration Scheme, which means anyone conducting activity on their behalf must register it, or face the prospect of prison. But more is required - as I have noted already, the National Security (State Threats) Act has given us powerful new tools to tackle state threats. We are also building a specialist mission in Counter Terror Policing to disrupt state threats, and tightening security around military bases.

Of course, resilience is about more than our physical defences. We are also establishing a National Centre for Information Defence to tackle disinformation from states. Our Cyber Security and Resilience Bill will protect everyday services, by strengthening national defences against cyber-attacks. We will go further, with our upcoming National Security Bill, and give intelligence agencies and police stronger powers to bear down on cyber-criminals.

Let me also say to the public, if you are ever worried about someone you know, tell a teacher or doctor or someone you trust, institutions like Prevent exist to stop people following a dark path from which there may be no return. If ever you see something suspicious, report it immediately to the police or a relevant authority and to businesses in an increasingly online world, consider the cyber threat that you face and strengthen your defences

Finally, to those responsible for some part of our critical infrastructure, let me say, we will work with you. The National Protective Security Authority and the National Cyber Security Centre stand ready to help. We can defeat those who mean us harm, but we are strongest when we act together.

In a more dangerous world, we are faced by threats, from without and within, that target our democracy and our way of life. In response, we are adapting and strengthening our defences. As ever I commend the work of the police and security services, who labour in silence to keep us safe, and I am sure the whole House joins me in offering thanks to them for that vital, life-saving work.

This Government is taking action in support of that effort, but I know there is more that we must do - as I have set out in this statement: to protect this country, to protect our citizens, and to protect our democracy. I hope the whole House can join together in that vital work, which is so much greater than any of our differences, because I know that those of us who choose to serve all share a belief: we will never be defeated by those who mean us harm.

I commend this Statement to the House.