Senate Judiciary Committee Democrats ask Marshals to proactively investigate unlawful threats and prepare to protect judges and their family members in the current heightened threat environment

WASHINGTON, D.C. - U.S. Senators Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff (both D-Calif.), members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and all Committee Democrats warned the U.S. Marshals Service (USMS) about the elevated threat environment for federal judges, Supreme Court justices, and their families and requested information about USMS' ability to investigate the threats against the judiciary.

"The USMS's Fiscal Year 2024 Annual Report noted an increase in 'the need for protective services' and 'the number and intensity of concerning and potentially threatening electronic communications related to' judges and other persons involved in the judicial process. Since then, federal judges at all levels of the judiciary and appointed by presidents of both parties have expressed concern for their and their colleagues' safety as a result of this threat environment. The level of these threats was sufficient to spur the federal judiciary to establish a Judicial Security and Independence Task Force," wrote the Senators.

The Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts announced the Judicial Security and Independence Task Force to respond to the growing number of threats to sitting federal judges, the judiciary's latest effort to protect its judges and staff against violence and intimidation. In their letter, the Senators urged the Marshals to investigate the sources of these threats and determine whether they violate federal law. The Senators also asked whether the Marshals have sufficient resources to protect judges and their families and whether recent cuts to Justice Department funding and personnel have hindered the Marshals' ability to conduct the necessary investigations.

"The USMS, as the agency primarily responsible for the federal judiciary's safety, must protect against these threats. As family members increasingly become targets, USMS should be prepared to provide protection as needed for targeted family members. USMS must also proactively investigate the sources of these threats, both for a full understanding of the threat environment and to determine whether civil or criminal remedies are appropriate," continued the Senators.

Federal judges, Supreme Court justices, and their family members have faced relentless attacks, especially on social media, which have escalated in recent years. A Supreme Court justice was the target of an assassination attempt, another justice's family member received bomb threats at her residence, a federal judge's child was threatened, and several federal judges have had deliveries anonymously sent to their residences in an apparent warning that people know their address.

U.S. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Federal Courts, Oversight, Agency Action, and Federal Rights, led the letter. In addition to Padilla and Schiff, the letter was also signed by Senator Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Senators Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Chris Coons (D-Del.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), and Peter Welch (D-Vt.).

Full text of the letter is available here and below:

Dear Acting Director Pittella:

We write to request a briefing at your earliest convenience on the U.S. Marshals Service's (USMS) response to threats against federal judges. These increasing threats of violence may endanger our system of government as well as the lives of these judges and their families- including in our home states.

In February 2024, former USMS Director Ronald Davis testified that "[t]he number of verified threats against federal judges has doubled in the last three years." Additionally, in January 2025, the USMS's Fiscal Year 2024 Annual Report noted an increase in "the need for protective services" and "the number and intensity of concerning and potentially threatening electronic communications related to" judges and other persons involved in the judicial process. Since then, federal judges at all levels of the judiciary and appointed by presidents of both parties have expressed concern for their and their colleagues' safety as a result of this threat environment. The level of these threats was sufficient to spur the federal judiciary to establish a Judicial Security and Independence Task Force.

The USMS, as the agency primarily responsible for the federal judiciary's safety, must protect against these threats. As family members increasingly become targets, USMS should be prepared to provide protection as needed for targeted family members. USMS must also proactively investigate the sources of these threats, both for a full understanding of the threat environment and to determine whether civil or criminal remedies are appropriate, including potential violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1503.

We would like to ensure that USMS has allocated its resources to fulfill these missions and to ensure that the USMS's work has not been damaged by DOJ personnel and funding cuts. Please let us know if additional USMS resources are necessary to guarantee the protection of our federal judges and their families.

To prepare for the briefing, we request answers to the below questions related to USMS's work on this front.

1. How has USMS responded to the threat environment with respect to federal judges?

2. What steps has USMS taken to ensure the safety of judges' family members as part of this threat environment?

3. What is USMS's current capacity to investigate threats against judges and their family members?

4. What is USMS's current capacity to analyze trends related to threats against judges and their family members, including the sources of those threat trends?

5. Have any recent executive branch personnel or funding decisions affected USMS's capacity to investigate or respond to threats against judges and their family members?

6. Does USMS need any additional resources to investigate and respond to threats against judges and their family members?

7. Has USMS, whether in conjunction with U.S. Attorneys' Offices or otherwise, evaluated whether any threats against judges or their family members constitute potential obstruction under 18 U.S.C. § 1503 or any related federal statute? What is the investigation protocol USMS follows for such threats?

Thank you for your attention to this matter, and we look forward to your response and a briefing.

Sincerely,

###