The Ohio State University

06/17/2025 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 06/17/2025 06:50

Why resisting social pressure is harder than you think

Maximizing the impact of social psychological research could help individuals better navigate real-life scenarios.
Photo: Getty Images
Download Media Kit
Preparing your download...
Download

An error occurred while preparing your download

17
June
2025
|
08:05 AM
America/New_York

Why resisting social pressure is harder than you think

Researchers find most don't think tendency for obedience applies to them

Tatyana Woodall
Ohio State News

Whether you have a rebellious personality or not, most people imagine they are better at overcoming pressure to violate their own principles than they really are, finds a new study.

Researchers found that most individuals think they would be more likely than the average person to disobey an immoral or unlawful order from an authority figure.

This phenomenon, called the "better-than-average effect," reveals that people are fairly resistant to internalizing beliefs that may harm their self-perceptions. In extreme cases, ignoring how everyone is subject to social pressure could leave a person vulnerable to the desires of malicious actors.

"Social pressures are way more powerful and impactful than we give them credit for," said Philip Mazzocco,lead author of the study and an associate professor of psychology at The Ohio State University. "If you fall under the sway of these pressures, you could end up engaging in behavior inconsistent with your values and morals."

The research began as a class project designed by Mazzocco's students, who based it on the Milgram experiment, a 1960s-era study that aimed to understand the link between obedience and authority. In these experiments, participants were asked by an authority figure to deliver what they believed to be painful and, at times, lethal electric shocks to another person.

The Milgram experiment suggested that people would obey authority even in conflict with their own beliefs.

The new study by Mazzocco and colleagues was recently published in the journal Current Psychology.

In this work, Mazzocco's team had more than 400 adults read first-person accounts of the shock study before asking them to predict their responses and those of the average person. Prior to these predictions, half were told that 65% of those in the original study exhibited "complete obedience," whereas the other half were given no additional information about the results.

Participants were asked at what voltage level, if any, they thought they would disobey and end the study. They could choose on a dial which ranged from 1 (which meant quitting the study after the first shock was delivered) to 31 (exhibiting complete obedience throughout the experiment). On average, participants thought they themselves would quit the study around dial 7. In contrast, participants surmised that the average person would not stop the study until approximately dial 12.

Those who were informed of the results of the Milgram study - that 65% of the original participants continued all the way to the final voltage level - did predict that the average person would administer significantly higher voltages than did those who were not told. But those who were informed did not think they themselves would deliver significantly higher shocks than did those who were not told. This was another indication of the better-than-average effect.

These results were almost identical to obedience levels reported by previous studies and correctly fit the team's theory that most would underpredict their likely obedience in a classic Milgram scenario. This suggests that in the absence of real compliance pressures, even fully imagining yourself in a situation can still lead a person to underestimate its influence on them.

"Just reading about a situation is not sufficient, as doing so doesn't really internalize the point that we're all really susceptible to these pressures," said Mazzocco. The study also likens the perceived difference between predicted and actual obedience to watching a horror movie play out from the safety of home versus the certainty of actually being pursued by someone.

Notably, while 65.2% of participants had not heard of the Milgram experiment before, researchers found that prior knowledge of the Milgram experiment didn't alter how participants viewed the likeliness of their participation. Finally, personality and value tests were given to participants to determine what role personal characteristics might play in a real-life situation.

One significant predictor of actual obedience in a Milgram-like scenario was conscientiousness - the personality trait of being responsible and having a tendency to adhere to rules and norms. Those who exhibited this trait were more likely to want to appease the experimenter.

But singular personality traits aside, not every human can be the exception to the rule, said Mazzocco. "Studies like these are relevant to society because if we all assume we're so resistant to obedience, we are not going to immunize ourselves against authority figures who want to take advantage of us," he said.

Such immunization techniques include learning to avoid situations where intense social pressures exist or having a strategy to deal with or escape a potentially negative encounter.

Still, Mazzocco admits removing oneself isn't always possible, and recommends cultivating curiosity to help a person keep true to their values.

Other Ohio State co-authors include Katie Reitler, Lauren Little, John Korte, Monicka Ridgill and Xamina Stalnaker.

Share this

Why resisting social pressure is harder than you think
Share on: X Share on: Facebook Share on: LinkedIn

More Ohio State News

RSS feed - More Ohio State News (opens in new window) View all headlines - More Ohio State News

Paper-based devices diagnose malaria in asymptomatic people

June
16
,
2025
| 12:29 PM America/New_York

Devices made with cheap strips of paper have outperformed two other testing methods in detecting malaria infection in asymptomatic people in Ghana - a diagnostic advance that could accelerate efforts to eliminate the disease, researchers say.

Read more

Quantum key distribution link established on Ohio State campus for the first time

June
13
,
2025
| 13:30 PM America/New_York

Researchers at The Ohio State University recently demonstrated quantum key distribution (QKD) between two separate buildings on the Columbus campus for the first time using in-ground optical fiber. This represents a major milestone for cybersecurity enabled by quantum information science and engineering at the university.

Read more

Parents spending more time, resources and money on kids' sports

June
12
,
2025
| 13:14 PM America/New_York

Parents, it is not just your imagination - you are spending more time, money and resources on your kids' sports activities than moms and dads from previous generations.

Read more
Show previous items Show next items
The Ohio State University published this content on June 17, 2025, and is solely responsible for the information contained herein. Distributed via Public Technologies (PUBT), unedited and unaltered, on June 17, 2025 at 12:50 UTC. If you believe the information included in the content is inaccurate or outdated and requires editing or removal, please contact us at support@pubt.io