10/27/2026 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 10/27/2026 13:36
When I was diagnosed with breast cancer 26 years ago, I had surgery to remove the cancerous area, followed by six weeks of daily radiation treatments. It was a bit onerous driving back and forth to the hospital daily to receive treatment, and by the third week I was very fatigued and had bright red areas on my breast that burned and were uncomfortable.
While I am grateful for the treatments that helped save my life and reduced the risk of breast cancer recurrence, it is reassuring to know that advances in radiation therapy have made treatment more manageable and less disruptive to everyday life.
"Breast cancer treatment has changed pretty significantly over the past 20 years," said Jeffrey Martin, MD, a radiation oncologist at Davenport-Mugar Cancer Center - Radiation Oncology at Cape Cod Hospital. "It used to be everyone got six weeks of radiation treatment. Nowadays, it is common for patients to get treated over three to four weeks resulting in fewer trips back and forth to the hospital and less skin toxicity."
Radiation therapy uses high-energy X-rays or other types of radiation to kill cancer cells or keep them from growing. It is an outpatient treatment that is administered over a number of weeks.
Treatments can be delivered either by external beam from a machine that targets radiation to the area of cancer, or internal radiation with the source of radiation placed inside your body near the cancer.
There are two types of external beam radiation that are currently used, said Dr. Martin:
When planning radiation treatment, care teams consider several things.
"A lot of it depends on a few factors," said Dr. Martin. "It depends on their tumor, the extent of the tumor, the patient's anatomy, breast size and shape and location of the tumor. All this information goes into the shared decision-making process with the patient. We will discuss a couple of different options for treatment and if they would be a good candidate for either of them. Sometimes, if a patient is a borderline candidate for one or the other, I will talk about the pros and cons of each approach."
The options for treatment with partial breast and full breast radiation, according to Dr. Martin are:
APBI focuses radiation on the area where the tumor was removed. Larger doses are given over a shorter period, limiting the amount of healthy breast tissue exposed to radiation and potentially reducing side effects. Patients may be able to complete treatment in as few as five radiation sessions.
In addition to shorter duration of treatments, there have been changes in the techniques to treat left-side breast cancer.
With a goal of reducing the later effects on the heart that can sometimes occur with more radiation, the patient is instructed to hold their breath as their treatment gets delivered, Dr. Martin said. It helps to inflate their lung and push their heart down and away from their breast. Using IMRT with the breath-hold technique, it will help reduce effects on the heart. Patients who have larger breasts can receive radiation treatment in the prone position (lying on their stomach) so their breast can be positioned away from the chest wall and helps the radiation stay off the heart and lung area.
"I think the most impressive change I have seen is how well people do with radiation now, especially with partial breast radiation," said Dr. Martin. "Patients go through the treatments without having a lot of side effects and when we see them back in follow-up, they have very little pinkness of their skin, and they often comment that the treatment wasn't bad. To see and hear how well they are doing has been very rewarding."