City of Santa Monica, CA

10/02/2025 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 10/02/2025 13:38

Santa Monica joins 29-city lawsuit to protect federal emergency and disaster funding

October 2, 2025 12:02 PM

SANTA MONICA, Calif. (Oct. 2, 2025) - Santa Monica joined 28 other local governments in a lawsuit filed Wednesday challenging the Trump administration's attempt to impose unlawful and unrelated conditions on federal emergency and disaster preparedness funds. The conditions would force local governments to adopt the administration's political agenda or risk losing critical funding.

The Santa Monica City Council authorized the city's participation in the lawsuit at its Sept. 30 meeting.

The lawsuit, filed in federal court in California, centers on over $350 million in grants administered by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

These funds help communities safeguard residents - more than 30 million people - through fire department staffing, port and transit security, counterterrorism, and hazard mitigation projects like wildfire and flood risk reduction. The lawsuit asks the court to stop DHS and FEMA from using life-saving funds as leverage for unrelated political agendas.

The administration is demanding that local governments participate in its immigration enforcement policies and abandon diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives as a condition of funding. The plaintiffs argue these conditions are unconstitutional and exceed the executive's authority, falling far outside what Congress authorized.

"For almost 75 years, Congress has been clear that one of the Federal Government's core functions is to provide resources and support to state and local governments to ensure that they are prepared to respond to emergencies and disasters," said Santa Clara County Counsel Tony LoPresti. "This Federal Administration is now unlawfully changing course, imposing unconstitutional conditions on critical grant funding that helps local governments hire first responders, fund search and rescue operations, retrofit facilities, and train employees in disaster response. Governments shouldn't have to pass a political litmus test to be able to care for their communities."

"Emergency management is the backbone of safe and resilient communities, and threatening its funding puts real lives at risk," said San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu. "This funding means faster emergency response times, stronger regional coordination, and better protection for our residents during disasters and terrorist attacks. The federal government's politically motivated grant conditions demonstrate both a disregard for our Constitution and the well-being of our residents."

"The Trump administration is trying to force governments to abandon policies that keep people safe," said Jill Habig, founder and CEO of Public Rights Project. "Tying federal safety and security funding to these demands is both coercive and dangerous. These funds are life-saving resources that communities rely on to prepare for and recover from wildfires, earthquakes, terrorism and other crises."

The stakes are high in communities across the country.

Santa Monica receives over $2 million annually in FEMA grants to enhance regional preparedness for disasters, emergencies, and other threats to national security. The funds are used to coordinate trainings for fire department personnel from 29 fire agencies throughout the region in preparing for man-made and natural disasters, for regional trainings to prepare and respond to violent incidents, and for key Urban Search and Rescue and HazMat equipment. Santa Monica was also recently approved for a grant to support health and wellbeing of its firefighters, who are at elevated risk for cancer and exposure to traumatic events. All of these programs are at risk if they remain tied to the new conditions.

"As we saw earlier this year with the Palisades Fire, emergencies can strike at any time, threatening our community safety," Santa Monica Mayor Lana Negrete said. "Wildfires don't have a political agenda, and our ability to respond to any disaster should not be determined by who is in power at any given time."

In Marin County, Calif., roughly 4,000 residents face greater flood risk without the $23 million the county is counting on for mitigation; in Los Angeles, Calif., $140 million in federal grants is earmarked for wildfire recovery - rebuilding communities, strengthening water infrastructure, and launching a mobile early warning system for evacuations; in Petaluma, Calif., federal funds are critical for protecting seniors in mobile home parks along the Petaluma River, ensuring vulnerable elders aren't left in floodwaters or wildfire danger.

In Santa Clara County, $3.6 million - nearly 43 percent of the Country's emergency management budget - is at risk, threatening preparedness for terrorism, disasters, and upcoming global events like Super Bowl LX and the 2026 FIFA World Cup. Without these funds, communities will be forced to divert scarce resources from other essential services, delay projects, or cancel them entirely.

The County of Santa Clara and the City and County of San Francisco are the lead plaintiffs. Public Rights Project is representing the additional plaintiffs.

The plaintiffs are: 

  • Alameda, Calif.
  • Bellingham, Wash.
  • Berkeley, Calif.
  • City and County of San Francisco, Calif.
  • Culver City, Calif.
  • King County, Wash.
  • Los Angeles, Calif.
  • Los Angeles County, Calif.
  • Los Angeles County Consolidated Fire Protection District, Calif. 
  • Marin County, Calif.
  • Oakland, Calif.
  • Palo Alto, Calif.
  • Pasadena, Calif.
  • Petaluma, Calif.
  • Pierce County, Wash.
  • Sacramento, Calif.
  • San Diego, Calif.
  • San Diego County, Calif.
  • San Jose, Calif.
  • San Mateo County, Calif.
  • Santa Clara County, Calif.
  • Santa Monica, Calif.
  • Santa Rosa, Calif.
  • Snohomish County, Wash.
  • Sonoma County, Calif.
  • Sonoma County Community Development Commission, Calif.
  • Sonoma County Water Agency, Calif.
  • Sonoma Valley County Sanitation District, Calif.
  • Tucson, Ariz.

The case is County of Santa Clara v. Noem (Case No. 3:25-cv-8330) and a copy of the complaint can be found here.

Media Contact

Tati Simonian Public Information Officer [email protected]

Departments

City Attorney's Office

City of Santa Monica, CA published this content on October 02, 2025, and is solely responsible for the information contained herein. Distributed via Public Technologies (PUBT), unedited and unaltered, on October 02, 2025 at 19:39 UTC. If you believe the information included in the content is inaccurate or outdated and requires editing or removal, please contact us at [email protected]