11/05/2026 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 11/05/2026 11:32
AI is moving fast, and many finance teams are still working out where it fits.
Manufacturing and distribution finance leaders are asking: How does AI actually work in the month-end close? Where do you start? And what should you ask before you commit?
In our latest webinar, AI Strategy & Execution Practice Leader Mike Rudinsky and Manufacturing & Distribution Industry Leader Dan Bailey answered those questions by walking through one reconciliation.
Earned Advantage™ offers a simple map for adopting AI, with four stages and four kinds of value:
Organizations can live in several stages at once. Strategy, governance, people, and systems run through all four. Your AP team might be in one place and FP&A in another.
In this illustrative example, an agent reconciles prepaid insurance for a sample manufacturer. The agent splits the work between rules and AI. Rules are fixed instructions that handle the data pulls, the math, and every obvious call. AI handles only what the rules can't: unclear memos, near matches, reading the invoice, and drafting the narrative.
The agent works through the reconciliation in four phases:
As Mike put it during the webinar: rules find the problem, and AI tells you what it is.
The agent proposes a fix but never posts an entry or changes the schedule. The preparer reviews the evidence, confirms it's a new policy, and adds it to the schedule. A separate reviewer signs off. The fix lives in the schedule, not in the AI. Nothing is retrained, and in July the account ties on its own at $134,000.
Across every prepaid account at Plant 07, 18 of 19 cleared. Instead of reviewing all 19 line by line, the team focuses on the one that didn't tie.
This example shows the ideal: an agent running every step, the same way every close. Starting smaller is completely fine. A library of tested prompts that someone on your team runs by hand is a good first step, especially for one-off analysis, a new process, or rules that are still changing. Once a process holds up for a few month-end closes, it makes sense to move it into an agent-run workflow.
If AI mislabels a transaction, the tie-out catches it. If it matches a payment to the wrong policy, the schedule check catches it. If it misreads an invoice, the reviewer catches it before sign-off.
Agent controls include:
With a faster close and fewer late adjustments, that extra time can go toward:
Ask yourself: Which decisions are you making on last month's numbers that you'd rather make on this week's?
One caution from the webinar: write down your team's judgment before you redeploy the time. The exceptions are where your team's expertise lives, and the documented rules are what make the agent work. If that expertise walks out the door first, the agent gets weaker.
As part of Earned Advantage, each AI use case is scored from 1 to 5 on three questions:
Value and readiness decide where a use case lands on your list. Risk decides how much control the agent gets. If you bring in a vendor to deliver them, ask:
If a vendor can't answer these clearly, that tells you a lot about whether it's ready for your month-end close. Vendor review should also tie into your own AI governance program: policies, ownership, risk tiers, and oversight have to come from your organization.
Whether you're just getting started, automating a few workflows, building agents to run the work, or turning the time you get back into an edge, Elliott Davis can help you take the next step.
Contact our AI Strategy & Execution team to get started.
The information provided in this communication is of a general nature and should not be considered professional advice. You should not act upon the information provided without obtaining specific professional advice. The information above is subject to change.
the
authors