A First Look at the QSE-5 B Sample

QuantumScape's planned first commercial product, QSE-5, is a amp-hour cell designed to meet the requirements of automotive applications. Here, we'll walk through the various elements of the cell specifications and explain some of the complexities behind the seemingly simple metric of energy density.

ENERGY DENSITY: More than a single number

For those who follow the battery industry, it can feel like there's a constant stream of headlines about new batteries with record-breaking energy densities. However, it is much rarer for those headlines to provide the context necessary to make sense of the numbers. Energy density cannot be evaluated in an apples-to-apples comparison from battery to battery without knowing factors such as cell size and weight, discharge rate, temperature, state of charge and operating pressure.

Let's start with the basic data: The QSE-5 B-sample cell has a measured cell energy of 21.6 Watt-hours (Wh) at C/5 discharge rate and 25 °C. This is divided by the cell volume to get the volumetric energy density of 844 Wh/L or by the cell mass to get the gravimetric energy density (also called specific energy) of 301 Wh/kg.

The story doesn't end there, though. First, some batteries are designed to optimize for either higher power or higher energy density, which affects the energy density of a given cell. But even beyond this, there is a larger set of questions that must be answered before energy density can be meaningfully compared from one cell to another. Let's walk through those questions one by one.

Cell dimensions

The cell dimensions of the QSE-5 are measured using an actual physical QSE-5 cell sample, not based on projections or models. Many battery developers take a smaller version of their commercial cell design and project what the energy density would be if scaled up to a larger format with better packaging efficiency, but those projections are based on assumptions that may not turn out to be accurate. When evaluating energy density claims, always ask whether the numbers you see are projections about possible future products or measurements of the actual cells.

Some reports of energy density relate only to the unpackaged active stack, which includes the electrodes and separator but not the outer packaging materials, but this is a little like reporting the calories in a sandwich without including the bread. Just like a sandwich, a commercial battery cell necessarily includes something to hold the whole package together. Since all commercial battery cells must be packaged in a can or pouch, active-stack energy density metrics are hard to interpret and may be misleadingly high. Accordingly, we measure energy density of a fully packaged cell.

Even with packaged cells, the format also matters: when measuring the volume of a cylindrical cell, for example, it is typical to include the whole cell can, whereas measurements of a pouch-type cell may exclude the thin tabbing area at the top or sides of the cell, since the tabs will be integrated into the larger module assembly. In keeping with this latter method, QSE-5 volume measurements exclude the top tabbing area above the frame, but include the folded laminate material on the other three edges.[1]

Photo of QSE-5 B Sample with dimensions

Last but not least, the volume of the cell depends on its state of charge. Even conventional batteries can swell by a few percent when fully charged; this effect is more pronounced in cells with silicon anodes, and in cells with lithium-metal anodes, the difference in volume between 0% and 100% state of charge (SoC) can be substantial. Importantly, if the cell volume is measured at 0% or 30% SoC, since the cell volume at low SoC is smaller, the volumetric energy density will also appear to be higher. But fundamentally, it doesn't make sense to quote the energy density of a cell at 0% SoC, because when a cell is fully discharged, it isn't storing any energy at all. We report QSE-5 energy density at 100% SoC, and we believe volumetric energy density should only be reported at 100% SoC so that the full impact of any swelling is accounted for.

Discharge rate

Our QSE-5 B sample has a measured discharge energy of 21.6 Wh. However, as with almost everything in batteries, energy can't easily be reduced to one simple number. Many other things also affect how much energy a battery can deliver to the end user.

One underappreciated factor is that the discharge rate, which relates directly to vehicle acceleration, influences the measured nominal capacity, or the total amount of electrical charge a battery can store. A good rule of thumb is that the slower the discharge rate, the higher the capacity the battery can deliver. This means that if nominal capacity is defined using a very low discharge rate, energy density might appear to be higher on paper than in practice. That's why it's important that nominal capacity be determined using a discharge rate that is relevant to how the battery is likely to be used.

There is no universal standard discharge rate for EV batteries, but many EV battery companies report energy density using a rate of C/5 (five-hour discharge) to measure the nominal capacity. In the real world, this is roughly equivalent to driving 350 miles at 70 miles per hour.[2] We believe this is a good approximation of the application where vehicle range, and therefore energy density, matters most to drivers, and this is the C-rate we used for our published QSE-5 B sample specs.

If a lower C-rate were used, such as C/20 (20-hour discharge), this slower discharge rate would make cell energy density appear higher, and some cell makers have used rates this slow (or slower) to report their energy density. However, C/20 discharge would be equivalent to taking a 350-mile trip while driving just 17.5 miles per hour, which is not how people typically use their cars. So, when evaluating energy density claims, it's always important to determine the discharge rate at which that energy density was measured and check whether it matches the intended application.

Temperature

We have written extensively about the impact temperature has on battery performance, and so it should be no surprise that it also can affect energy density. When it comes to solid-state batteries in particular, technologies such as polymer-based solid electrolytes often require elevated temperatures to overcome the ionic resistance of the solid electrolyte and deliver high energy density. A battery technology that offers high energy density at 60 °C but poor energy density at room temperature is not particularly useful for passenger electric vehicles. Energy density specifications should therefore always include the temperature at which the battery was discharged; in the case of the QSE-5 B sample, that figure is 25 °C (room temperature).

Operating pressure and packing efficiency

All lithium-ion batteries expand and contract as they are charged and discharged, but the modules or packs into which they are built typically do not. This means that the pressure the cell experiences will vary depending on state of charge, and the compressive force felt by the cell will impact its volume. In the case of QSE-5, the cell is designed to operate in a range below 3.4 atm applied pressure, and the volumetric energy density figure reflects the dimensions of the cell at 100% state of charge when built into a fixed-volume module.

The QSE-5 is in the FlexFrame format, a hybrid of conventional prismatic and pouch designs, which allows each cell to pack tightly next to its neighbor. Contrast this with the popular cylindrical format, which loses roughly 9% of its energy density when assembled into a pack volume due to fundamental cell geometry. This means that cell-level volumetric energy density figures for cylindrical cells somewhat overstate the system-level energy density that can be realized in a full vehicle pack.

The energy density checklist

While energy density is one of the most commonly reported battery metrics, there are complexities involved that cannot be reduced to one simple number. That's why we created a helpful checklist as a guide to make it easier to evaluate the completeness and comparability of energy density claims.

QSE-5 B Sample

Are the figures measured or projected? Measured figures

Is the cell fully packaged? Fully packaged

Is any part of the cell excluded (tabs, etc.)? Excluding tabbing area

At what state-of-charge was the volume measured? 100% SoC

What is the discharge rate? C/5

What is the discharge temperature? 25 °C

What is the operating pressure? < 3.4 atm

What is the cell format? FlexFrame

In sum, the QSE-5 B sample represents a significant advancement in battery technology and an important milestone for QuantumScape. Its impressive topline energy density also provides an example of the importance of the individual factors that go into delivering energy density in automotive applications, such as the physical cell dimensions, discharge rate, temperature, and operating pressure.

Public link

Please use the above public link if you want to share this noodl on another website.