Warner Statement on the White House's AI Legislative Framework

WASHINGTON - U.S. Sen. Mark R. Warner (D-VA), Vice Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, issued the following statement:

"Today's AI legislative framework takes some steps in the right direction but lacks significant substance. We need laws on AI and children's privacy and data, including the kinds of user-empowering tools I've long championed in bipartisan legislation. We need to do more on deepfake non-consensual intimate images, as I've advocated for years now. We need laws to ensure that AI benefits all Americans, like my bipartisan Economy of the Future Act is designed to develop. We need researchers, students, and small businesses to have access to AI tools to ensure that development of this technology isn't concentrated in the hands of a few large companies.

"We also need national security agencies to establish plans to mitigate against national security threats from advanced AI. But, two years in a row, the Senate Intelligence Committee passed bills that would have required that kind of proactive engagement strategy to get ahead of malicious foreign actors. And two years in a row, President Trump's allies in Congress killed those provisions from being enacted into law.

"Unfortunately, this slim framework also does many things wrong.

"The framework is worse than silent on AI-powered mis- and disinformation, a real and growing threat to our elections, our markets, and our country. Instead, it trots out the same old talking points about combatting partisan or ideological bias to cloak its own inaction on - and worse, its encouragement and use of - deepfakes and other AI slop being used for a wide range of harmful activity.

"Furthermore, it once again raises the threat of preempting state's ability to regulate AI where AI affects their citizens and institutions; notably, the administration's last attempt to do Big AI's bidding was defeated 99-1 in the Senate last year.

"Overall, it reminds me of the administration's cybersecurity strategy: several pages of broad goals, all of them short on substance."

###