10/30/2026 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 10/30/2026 08:04
Share
Position
Position
Position
Pharma services continues to attract investor interest, but heightened selectivity, policy uncertainty, and evolving market dynamics are reshaping where capital is being deployed. Following the Goodwin Pharma Services Symposium, Jordan Abrams shares five key takeaways on the investment landscape, including the growing importance of asset differentiation, AI's evolving role in drug development, and shifting global development strategies. Additionally, he highlights the factors investors should consider as they evaluate opportunities and position assets for long-term growth and successful exits.
Investors still have ample capital to deploy in pharma services, but the bar for putting it to work is higher. Policy uncertainty, a shortage of top-tier assets, and changes in where drugs are developed and made are reshaping where investors see value. The Goodwin Pharma Services Symposium brings together industry executives, investors, and advisors, to discuss the latest in pharma services investing. Here are five takeaways from the Goodwin Pharma Services Symposium, and what they mean for investors:
There are few A+ assets in pharma services right now, and investors are being selective with the assets they choose. Policy overhangs, including the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and Most Favored Nation (MFN) drug pricing, add to this caution. With fewer standout assets on the market, carve-outs are now becoming a more attractive way to find quality.
Investor selectivity shows up most clearly at exit. Owners of top-tier assets are well placed to sell now, while average assets are much harder to sell. Growth alone no longer carries a sale process; successful exits require clear differentiation or above-market margins. Investors who assess what future buyers will look for midway through holds will still have time to close gaps before a sale.
Valuations in market access and commercialization are high, but the space is still attractive, with ad spend in particular remaining an opportunity. Paying a premium for a strong commercialization asset can still make sense if investors are more selective elsewhere.
For contract development and manufacturing organizations (CDMOs), commercial capabilities are now table stakes. Large pharma clients want a partner that can support a drug across its full lifecycle, from clinical through commercial (though specialization still adds value). Because pharma relationships are sticky, new customers are hard to win organically, which has made M&A a main way to add them.
AI isn't making preclinical pipelines bigger. Rather, it's raising success rates. That means the programs entering the clinic should continue to improve over the next 10-15 years. Further along the development path, the nearest-term opportunities are practical ones, especially in patient recruitment and manufacturing. Beyond those use cases, data and analytics in pharma services are still early.
China has become a real option for drug development due to efficiencies in Phase 2 trials because of lower labor costs and a less complex regulatory environment. The expectation that those studies must be repeated in the US or EU is fading, and MFN is speeding up the shift. The cost advantage extends beyond development to the price of therapies themselves. In cell therapy, for example, treatments cost around $400K today, and China is working toward bringing that closer to $20K. That gap may become hard for the industry to ignore.
Supply chains face similar pressure. Reshoring has practical limits, and tariff policy is still unpredictable. Being able to source from both sides of the Atlantic reduces geographic concentration and tariff exposure.
Clinical trials are growing in number and complexity, and more than 80% fail to enroll on time. That gap has turned sites into an investable asset class. The site market has been consolidating for the past 5-10 years and now includes dozens of PE-backed platforms. Sites also carry limited AI disruption risk. Scale matters, but service quality and execution are still what separates the leaders.
Pharma services remain an attractive market, but the bar for a premium outcome is higher. Key questions to ask in commercial diligence:
Grant Thornton Stax brings corporate strategy and operational knowledge within the healthcare industry, paired with 30+ years of experience serving clients throughout the investment lifecycle. Our highly specialized healthcare team, consisting of seasoned industry experts and insiders, provides knowledgeable depth and breadth to every engagement-delivering comprehensive coverage spanning the entire healthcare landscape. Click here to learn more about our Healthcare expertise or contact us directly.