Leveraging the judiciary's convening power

As court leaders, judges possess the ability to bring together diverse stakeholders who might not otherwise collaborate. From prosecutors and defense attorneys to law enforcement, behavioral health providers, social service agencies, and individuals with lived experience, the judiciary can unite these groups to break down silos and create meaningful change.

The Conference of Chief Justices/Conference of State Court Administrators recognized this critical role, leading to the creation of the National Judicial Opioid Task Force and the National Judicial Task Force to Examine State Courts' Response to Mental Illness. These initiative have produced valuable resources, including the Leading Change Guide for Trial Court Leaders: Improving the Court and Community's Response to Mental Health and Co-Occurring Disorders, designed to help judges lead initiatives tailored to their local jurisdictions.

Support for this approach through Illinois is promulgated in Recommendation 1.4 of the Illinois Courts' Mental Health Action plan which reads:

"The Task Force recommends the Supreme Court distribute a copy of this Action Plan, along with the Leading Change Guide for Trial Court Leaders to all Circuit Court Judges and Trial Court Administrators and encourage and empower all circuit courts to develop judicially-led interdisciplinary teams to advise and support local Sequential Intercept Mapping activities and strategies."

Collaboration is considered a best practice and can lead to more effective resource allocation and a more cohesive system response to behavioral health and justice challenges.

Benefits of a localized approach

A localized approach is critical for addressing the unique needs and resources of a specific community. Court-led, interdisciplinary teams at the local level can:

• Tailor solutions: Strategies can be customized to the specific demographics, resources, and challenges of the community.
• Improve accessibility: By coordinating local resources, interdisciplinary teams can make it easier for individuals to access timely and appropriate behavioral health related service needs close to home, which fosters engagement and long-term recovery.
• Strengthen relationships: Local interdisciplinary teams can build understanding and trust among community partners, leading to more seamless and effective collaboration.

Evidence of impact

Research demonstrates that well-functioning interdisciplinary teams can deliver measurable results such as:

• Improved systemic coordination: More effective resource allocation and efficient processes.
• Enhanced fairness and equity: Identification and correction of systemic biases, including health, economic, and social disparities.
• Improved community safety: Collaborative efforts can contribute to a reduction in crime and an overall improvement in community safety.

By convening and leading a council, courts can transform the trajectory for individuals with behavioral health needs from cycles of recidivism to pathways of recovery.

Take action

• Review the Leading Change Guide for Trial Court Leaders.
• Watch the Illinois Innovations Session: Developing and Facilitating a Court-led Justice and Behavioral Health Coordinating Council.
• Contact Scott Block, State Court Behavioral Health Administrator, Administrative Office of the Illinois Courts at [email protected] for guidance and support.

Courts have the power to drive collaboration, ensure accountability, and champion data-driven approaches to addressing the complex intersection of behavioral health and justice. The time to lead is now.