02/24/2026 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 02/24/2026 13:59
Photo: Kostiantyn Liberov/Libkos/Getty Images
Critical Questions by Caitlin Welsh, Emma Curtis, Joseph Glauber, Antonina Broyaka, and Vitalii Dankevych
Published February 24, 2026
The immediate impacts of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine on Ukraine's agriculture sector were abrupt and widespread. Though Ukrainian producers have demonstrated remarkable resilience in wartime, evidence of long-term reductions in Ukraine's grain exports has emerged. Russia's grain exports surged early in the war, but today, weather and labor shortages are threatening Russia's agricultural output-and its ability to utilize its food exports for global influence. Russia's fertilizer exports confer additional economic and political advantage for Moscow, with fertilizer exports variably affected since 2022. How are the dynamics of war affecting global agriculture markets and global food security? How can Ukraine's allies best support its agricultural recovery and long-term growth?
Q1: How has Russia's war affected Ukraine's agriculture sector, four years later?
A1: According to CSIS analysis, Ukraine's 2025 exports of corn, barley, wheat, and meslin-among its top agricultural exports-were 35 percent lower than 2020, the last year whose harvest was unaffected by Russia's full-scale invasion of the country. This represents the cumulative impacts of Russia's war on Ukraine's agriculture sector. The restriction of Ukraine's agricultural exports following Russia's invasion in February 2022, due primarily to limitations on Ukraine's access to its Black Sea ports and reliance on alternative transportation for grains, pushed the export of some grains into 2023 and 2024, temporarily increasing grain exports in those years. Increased grain exports were misinterpreted by some policymakers to represent the full recovery of Ukraine's agriculture sector from the effects of war, while numerous factors continue to suppress agricultural production and export from the country.
Ukraine is the world's most mined country, and a significant amount of landmines and unexploded ordnance (UXO) contaminate Ukraine's farmland. Today, Ukraine's Ministry of Economy, Environment, and Agriculture estimates that at least 10,000 hectares of farmland potentially contaminated with landmines and UXO are still being cultivated by farmers. Approximately 1 million hectares of farmland remain suspected of contamination, endangering farmers' lives and limiting the area of land under cultivation. Also limiting cultivation is the destruction of irrigation infrastructure by Russian forces. The Kakhovka Reservoir had supplied the most extensive irrigation system in Ukraine (and Europe), critical for agriculture in southeastern Ukraine. The destruction of the reservoir by Russia in 2023 destroyed significant proportions of irrigation systems in Khersonka, Zaporizka, and Dnipropetrovska oblasts, contaminating farms and leaving roughly 600,000 hectares of farmland without irrigation. The Russian occupation of parts of southern and eastern Ukraine further reduces Ukrainian agricultural output. According to NASA Harvest, approximately 40 percent of Ukraine's total agricultural output comes from land directly impacted by Russia's invasion. This land, including parts of Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizka, and Khersonka oblasts, accounts for significant proportions of Ukraine's wheat, sunflower seed, millet, and barley production. Russia has appropriated and exported as much as 15 million metric tons of grains grown in these regions, plus Crimea, according to Ukrainian intelligence, since 2022.
Another factor limiting Ukraine's exports is its access to EU markets. Given Russia's threats to the safety of Black Sea navigation, Ukraine exported a greater share of its grain exports through the European Union following Russia's full-scale invasion. Ukraine's continued exports relied on access to European markets, while a surge in Ukrainian imports caused friction within the European Union. The European Union reimposed safeguards on certain agricultural imports from Ukraine, including grains, in mid-2025, limiting Ukraine's exports to the region. In October 2025, Ukraine and the European Union reached an agreement over EU imports from Ukraine, though select bordering countries, including Poland, Hungary, and Slovakia, continue to impose bans on agricultural imports from Ukraine.
Furthermore, a growing labor shortage presents additional challenges to Ukraine's agriculture sector. According to a State Statistics Service survey at the end of 2025, more than 20 percent of agricultural companies identified labor shortages as a key factor limiting business development. Mobilization for military service, migration, demographic decline in rural areas, and the destruction of social infrastructure in frontline regions have significantly reduced the availability of skilled and unskilled workers, presenting a barrier to restoring Ukraine's agricultural production and export capacity.
Finally, Russia's attacks on Ukrainian agricultural export infrastructure and ships carrying Ukrainian grain continue to threaten the export of Ukrainian agricultural products, drive up insurance costs for cargo vessels in the Black Sea, and depress prices received by Ukrainian producers. Following an increase in Russian attacks on export infrastructure and ships in late 2024, Russia was also implicated in the missile attack of a grain vessel in Odesa, which was carrying wheat to Algeria, killing four people in March 2025; the drone attack of a Turkish vessel carrying Ukrainian sunflower oil to Egypt in mid-December 2025; and drone attacks on two civilian ships preparing to load wheat in the ports of Pivdennyi and Chornomorsk in late December 2025.
Q2: How has Russia's war affected Russia's own agriculture sector, four years later?
A2: The main theater of Russia's war remains Ukraine's territory, so while Ukraine's agricultural land is directly affected by warfare, Russia's grain production and exports have been relatively undiminished by the direct effects of the war. Nonetheless, Russia's agriculture sector has recently been affected by weather and secondary impacts of the war, threatening Russia's agricultural economy.
Russia's wheat exports surged from 39 million metric tons in the 2020-2021 marketing year to a record-setting 55 million metric tons in the 2023-2024 marketing year, due to favorable growing conditions alongside Russia's unimpeded access to its Black Sea and Azov Sea ports, in addition to appropriation of Ukrainian export infrastructure and grain, which Russia added to its harvest and sold as its own. By 2024, a full 22 percent of wheat on global markets was of Russian origin, offering Moscow opportunities to utilize its agricultural exports, chiefly wheat, for political leverage in food-importing countries. Russian agricultural exports increased in value relative to its other exports, including energy, leading Moscow to increase its emphasis on agricultural exports in its economic plans. In May 2024, Russian state media outlet RT reported that Putin aimed for Russia to have the fourth-highest GDP in the world by 2030, driven by a shift in exports "away from energy products, with agriculture considered a significant driver of future foreign trade." By late 2024, Russia was reported to have set a price floor for its wheat exports, attempting to ensure continued revenue amid falling global grain prices.
Following the 2023-2024 surge, Russian wheat exports leveled off and, because adverse weather has reduced harvests in some parts of the country, wheat exports are estimated at 44 million metric tons for the 2025-2026 marketing year, marking a 20 percent decline from the 2023-2024 record. At the same time, according to Russia's agriculture minister, Russia's farm sector is losing approximately 150,000 agricultural workers per year, consistent with persistent labor shortages nationwide. Still, in July 2025, Russia's Minister of Agriculture maintained that Russian grain exports for the 2024-2025 marketing year were consistent with the five-year average, and that Russia continued to "expand the geography of exports" with 11 new countries importing Russian grain and seven countries that had stopped importing from Russia resuming purchases. Moscow continues to aim to increase its grain exports by 50 percent through 2030, but, anticipating growing competition from other grain producers, Moscow is reported to be emphasizing its seeds and agricultural technologies among its major agricultural exports. Russia recently accused a U.S. fund that owns major agricultural assets in Russia of extremism, an accusation often levied to justify state seizures of foreign assets consistent with seizures of agricultural assets of major Western firms, including NCH Capital, Danone, and a U.S.-owned canned food company, reportedly to secure the Russian food supply and feed the Russian army.
Today, Russia continues to incorporate Ukrainian land and production infrastructure into its grain-export efforts, decreasing Ukraine's exports and increasing the volume of grains considered to be Russian on global markets. Satellite imagery indicates a high intensity of activity in the occupied territories, showing maximum plowing rates and near-complete utilization of arable land. In 2025, Russia reportedly stole over 2 million tons of Ukrainian grain from occupied territories, exported grains via ports in the Azov and Black Seas using a shadow fleet, and directed it to markets in Africa, Asia, the Middle East, and Europe, with nearly 40 percent shipped to Egypt. Ukrainian authorities have sanctioned dozens of ships and captains involved, emphasizing that this illicit trade not only distorts global food markets but also finances Russia's war effort. Such practices not only expand Russia's resource base but also create long-term challenges for Ukraine's postwar agricultural recovery, restitution of property rights, and reintegration of occupied lands into Ukraine's economic framework.
In addition to grains, Russia is a top exporter of fertilizer to global markets, conferring significant revenue and influence for Moscow. CSIS analysis shows uneven impacts of the war on Russia's exports of nitrogen (anhydrous ammonia, urea), phosphate (diammonium phosphate, or DAP), and potassium (potash) fertilizers. Russia's exports of potash fell in 2022, likely due to indirect effects of sanctions imposed on Russia by Western countries. Though sanctions explicitly exempted Russia's food and fertilizer exports, they implicated the financial systems used to purchase agricultural products, complicating financial transactions and discouraging purchases from Russia. According to CSIS analysis, Russia's exports of potash have recovered dramatically; some of this increase could represent potash exports from Belarus being transshipped through Russia, while the increase could also be due to the export of Russian fertilizer through friendly countries in order to avoid sanctions. Before Russia invaded Ukraine, Russia had exported most of its anhydrous ammonia through the Togliatti-Odesa pipeline. Operation of the pipeline ceased following Russia's invasion in early 2022. The pipeline was damaged and rendered inoperable in June 2023, and CSIS analysis shows that Russia's exports of anhydrous ammonia fell significantly through 2025. Exports of urea and DAP have not significantly changed since 2022. Global fertilizer prices spiked following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, had receded by 2023, and are increasing today due to strong demand and rising input prices.
Q3: How has Russia's war affected global agriculture markets and global food security, four years later?
A3: Low and stable global agriculture prices are important for food security around the world. Russia's invasion of Ukraine pushed global food prices to all-time nominal highs in 2022, delaying the recovery of global agriculture markets from shocks brought by the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020 and increasing food prices in many countries around the world, putting the cost of staple foods and more nutritious foods out of reach. At the same time, the cost of delivering food assistance-Russia's invasion brought concurrent spikes in global energy prices-soared, delaying the provision of lifesaving food aid for millions. Today, global food prices-for cereals and oils, the major commodities exported from the Black Sea, and for meat and dairy, whose prices depend on animal feed costs-are generally declining from their 2022 peak. While Ukraine's agricultural exports are falling, exports from other countries have helped bolster the supply of commodities on global agriculture markets.
Still, an estimated 673 million people around the world are undernourished, a number higher than pre-pandemic, while an estimated 318 million people are facing acute food insecurity, double the number of people facing acute food insecurity in 2019. Despite falling global agriculture prices, food insecurity and malnutrition continue to affect millions due to local economic and political conditions, ranging from persistent inflation to armed conflict.
Nonetheless, stable agriculture markets remain important for food security worldwide. The ultimate impact of Russia's war in Ukraine on global agriculture markets and global food security is the reduction in output from one of the world's top agricultural producers. Extreme weather and other disruptions can reduce agricultural exports from any country, today and in the future. Resilient global agriculture markets require strong exports from all major producing countries. Ukraine's agricultural output is diminished by Russia's war, affecting the ability of global markets to respond to future market shocks.
Q4: What are the prospects for Ukraine's agriculture sector going forward?
A4: Direct attacks on its agriculture sector notwithstanding, Ukraine remains among the world's top agricultural exporters, due to the dedication of Ukraine's farmers and agribusinesses alongside support from the Ukrainian government, allied governments, multinational organizations, and philanthropies. Despite projected reductions in agricultural output, Ukraine is still expected to rank among the world's top three exporters of sunflower and rapeseed, the world's fourth top exporter of corn, and among the top six exporters of wheat, barley, and soybeans in 2026, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. At the same time, losses and damages to Ukraine's agriculture sector due to the war were estimated at $83.9 billion at the end of 2024 and have almost certainly increased since then. The prioritization of Ukraine's agricultural recovery by Ukraine's government, allied governments, and others reflects recognition of Ukraine's importance to global agriculture markets and global food security. Initiatives launched and funding committed since 2022 have been significant, while substantial needs remain.
Essential to the recovery and future growth of Ukraine's agriculture sector is accession into the European Union. Accession negotiations formally commenced in 2024, with accession expected to be completed within the next several years (though some advocate for Ukraine to join the European Union as early as 2027). Ukraine's deputy prime minister for European and Euro-Atlantic integration recently announced a National Program for Adoption of the EU acquis, a strategic document guiding Ukraine's full alignment with EU legal and institutional standards, as well as the Ukrainian government's plan to continue work with farmers across Ukraine toward meeting the European Union's Common Agricultural Policy standards. Successful EU integration will enable Ukrainian producers to generate higher revenues and reinvest them into critical areas of operation, including technological modernization, value-added processing, and human capital development. Beyond a political objective, integration into the European Union is a powerful economic recovery mechanism, stimulating self-sustaining growth for Ukraine's agricultural sector.
Q5: What else is needed to support the recovery and growth of Ukraine's agriculture sector?
A5: In addition to EU integration, investment priorities include adaptation to climate change and modernization of infrastructure. Ukraine is experiencing increasingly volatile weather patterns, including fluctuations in temperatures and precipitation during winter, threatening significant winter crop losses. Rising drought risks and water shortages further intensify production uncertainty. Support should therefore focus on climate-resilient farming systems, including improved seed varieties, agricultural risk insurance, digital weather monitoring, soil conservation practices, and modern irrigation technologies.
Modernizing Ukraine's agricultural export infrastructure should involve developing decentralized grain storage, multimodal terminals, strengthened border logistics, and alternative export corridors, alongside pursuing energy autonomy for agricultural enterprises. Furthermore, investments should prioritize Ukraine's irrigation infrastructure. Following the destruction of the Kakhovka Dam and irrigation system, investments can support decentralized, energy-efficient irrigation systems, drip irrigation, water storage solutions, and sustainable water use practices.
While support in these regards will be critical for Ukraine's agricultural recovery, the sector will not achieve its full potential until a ceasefire is negotiated and a peace agreement is reached. Until this time, increased support for Ukraine's defense capabilities, including maritime defense, will be essential for Ukraine's continued production and export of agricultural products to global markets.
Caitlin Welsh is the director of the Global Food and Water Security Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in Washington, D.C. Emma Curtis is a research associate with the Global Food and Water Security Program at CSIS. Joseph Glauber is a senior adviser (non-resident) with the Global Food and Water Security Program at CSIS. Antonina Broyaka is a senior associate (non-resident) with the Global Food and Water Security Program at CSIS. Vitalii Dankevych is a senior associate (non-resident) with the Global Food and Water Security Program at CSIS.
Critical Questions is produced by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a private, tax-exempt institution focusing on international public policy issues. Its research is nonpartisan and nonproprietary. CSIS does not take specific policy positions. Accordingly, all views, positions, and conclusions expressed in this publication should be understood to be solely those of the author(s).
© 2026 by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. All rights reserved.
Report by Antonina Broyaka, Vitalii Dankevych, Emma Curtis, and Caitlin Welsh - June 4, 2025
Report by Caitlin Welsh and Joseph Glauber - February 29, 2024
Critical Questions by Caitlin Welsh, Emma Curtis, and Joseph Glauber - May 6, 2025