03/19/2026 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 03/19/2026 09:49
WASHINGTON, D.C. - Today, Senator Rick Scott sent a letter to the heads of the Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, and Food and Drug Administration calling for a review of the Chinese Communist Party's involvement in the United States' clinical trials and drug approvals. In his letter, Senator Scott called on agency heads to consider the risks this poses to America's national security, American jobs, and patient safety.
This letter follows Senator Scott's bipartisan work as Chairman of the U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging with his CLEAR LABELS Act to ensure greater transparency in America's pharmaceutical supply chain, helping patients, pharmacists, and other purchasers make more informed decisions about the medications they rely on while supporting American jobs, strengthening domestic pharmaceutical manufacturing, and rebuilding a secure and reliable U.S. supply chain so families can have confidence that their medicines are safe, properly regulated, and clearly labeled.
Read the full letter HEREor below:
Dear Secretary Kennedy, Director Bhattacharya, and Commissioner Makary:
I write to express serious concerns regarding the participation of Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-linked entities in the United States clinical trial and drug approval process, and to request immediate action to ensure that national security considerations are fully integrated into the review of such applications.
For years, the CCP has engaged in systematic efforts to acquire American intellectual property, including through economic espionage and the exploitation of research collaborations. These actions have imposed high economic costs and created substantial national security risks. The biotechnology sector - particularly advanced therapeutics such as cell and gene therapies - represents a strategic domain in which protecting American innovation and sensitive health data is paramount. The stakes could not be higher: the U.S. bioscience industry employed nearly 2.3 million Americans and generated more than $3.2 trillion in economic output in 2023, while indirectly supporting nearly 8 million additional jobs. Communist China's IP theft and espionage directly threaten this powerful engine of national prosperity.
I have been made aware that Bioheng, also known as Imviva, a China-based company reportedly financed by CCP-linked sources1, has received authorization to proceed under an Investigational New Drug (IND) application and has been granted Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy (RMAT) designation and priority review. The decision to extend expedited regulatory benefits to a CCP-linked entity warrants careful scrutiny.
According to publicly available information, the company proposes to collect donor cells in China, engineer CAR-T cancer therapies in China, and administer those therapies to American patients through U.S.-based clinical trials, and transmit related clinical and patient data abroad. In the context of cell and gene therapies, this model raises not only data security concerns, but also patient safety risks related to chain-of-identity, chain-of-custody, manufacturing quality control, and the ability of U.S. regulators to conduct effective oversight and enforcement when critical processing occurs outside U.S. jurisdiction. Given the CCP's legal authority to access data held by Chinese companies and longstanding concerns about intellectual property protection and state-sponsored economic espionage, this model presents significant risks that must be addressed.
This case appears to reflect broader vulnerabilities in the current oversight framework. Federal law enforcement agencies have repeatedly documented Chinese state-sponsored trade secret theft and economic espionage, including in the biomedical sector. National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded researchers have faced prosecution for failing to disclose foreign affiliations, and federal agencies have taken steps in recent years to strengthen disclosure and transparency requirements. Despite these efforts, it remains unclear whether national security risks are being consistently and rigorously evaluated in connection with IND approvals, expedited designations, and clinical trial authorizations involving entities linked to foreign adversaries.
As the world's largest public funder of biomedical research, the NIH has a responsibility to safeguard taxpayer-funded innovation. As the federal regulator responsible for approving and overseeing clinical trials and therapeutics, the Food and Drug Administration must ensure that safety, efficacy, and national security considerations are fully integrated into its decision-making. The Department of Health and Human Services plays a central role in coordinating these responsibilities.
Accordingly, I request that your agencies take the following actions:
This matter extends beyond routine regulatory review. It involves protecting American patients receiving advanced therapies, safeguarding sensitive health data, and preserving U.S. leadership in biotechnology. The CCP has publicly articulated a strategy of "military-civil fusion," which seeks to integrate civilian research advances into military capabilities. That context must inform our evaluation of foreign participation in strategically sensitive sectors.
The United States must remain open to legitimate scientific collaboration, but openness cannot come at the expense of national security or patient protection. A failure to account for these risks undermines both.
I request a detailed written response within 60 days outlining:
Thank you for your prompt attention to this important matter. I look forward to your response.
See below to read more about Senator Scott's bipartisan work as Chairman of the U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging:
###