10/31/2026 | Press release | Distributed by Public on 10/31/2026 04:15
Recent commentary on agentic AI's effects on banking misunderstands what is at stake and what is motivating banks to block AI agents, BPI's Greg Baer and Paige Pidano Paridon write in an American Banker op-ed this week. "Agentic AI in banking includes two major use cases," Baer and Paridon write. "One involves an agent accessing a customer's account to make payments or otherwise transact. A second involves an agent managing the customer's account - either maximizing yield by regularly sweeping funds from a deposit account to a higher-yielding product or reducing the customer's risk by moving uninsured deposits out of a struggling bank. These use cases raise four important questions that should not be conflated." To read more, click here.
Legal Definition and Duties: The longstanding legal concept of agency means one person (the principal) authorizes another (the agent - for example, a lawyer or financial adviser) to act on the principal's behalf and subject to his control. The agent must:
Accountability - Or Not: An agent who breaches these duties can be liable for the resulting damages, a level of accountability that inspires trust in a human agent to act in the principal's interest. Users of AI agents may expect the same of those "agents," but making that assumption could put the user at serious risk. Despite its name, an AI "agent" has none of the obligations of a true agent. We asked one to be sure.
Hackers drained up to $6.3 billion from crypto exchange Binance this week in the largest crypto hack on record. "The incident at the world's largest crypto exchange highlights how vulnerabilities can extend even to the biggest players," Bloomberg reported. The exchange, which suspended withdrawals as of early Friday morning, said it will make all losses whole. The hack may involve an engineer's compromised computer, according to the company, and the hackers are suspected to be linked to North Korea. The breach reignites concerns about security risks and recourse - or lack thereof - when crypto platforms are hacked and investors lose coins. Bitcoin prices slumped in the wake of the attack.
Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha recently filed a lawsuit against Meta, accusing the social media company of failing to prevent fraudulent ads on its platforms, "despite representing to the public that it engages in sophisticated efforts to prevent such ads." Rhode Island is the first state to file such a lawsuit against Meta on these grounds, according to a press release from Neronha's office. The state alleges that Meta continues to allow scam ads because "they generate substantial revenue," despite knowing the harm they cause to vulnerable consumers. The lawsuit follows investigative reporting from Reuters that Meta projected about 10 percent of its annual ad revenue in 2024 would come from scam ads.
Fraud and scams are a national emergency, sapping billions of dollars from Americans annually. The FTC estimates that the cost of fraud to consumers in 2025 may have been as high as $261.5 billion. And bank impersonation scams are particularly pernicious because they exploit consumers' trust in their financial institution. This year, Congress and federal regulators have increasingly targeted this problem at its source, seeking to hold telecom and social media companies accountable for the scams that spread on their networks. Here is an overview of key recent government actions.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit on Monday affirmed a lower court ruling invalidating the Federal Reserve's debit interchange fee cap. The case, Corner Post v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, centers on Regulation II, the Board's regulation implementing the Durbin Amendment, a provision of federal law requiring the Fed to establish standards for assessing whether the amount of any debit interchange fee is reasonable and proportional to the cost incurred by the issuer with respect to the transaction. The Fed's rule caps interchange fees at 21 cents, plus 0.05% of the transaction's value to account for fraud losses with an additional cent available to issuers meeting specified fraud-prevention standards. The plaintiffs, led by a North Dakota truck stop, accuse the Fed of using impermissible costs in calculating the debit interchange fee cap. The Eighth Circuit decision vacates the existing 21-cent cap in the rule and remands to the Federal Reserve to establish a "fee structure that reflects the statute Congress wrote." BPI filed a motion to intervene in the case in support of the rule, but the motion was denied.
Here's the latest in digital assets.
Here's the latest in international banking policy.
CIBC this week announced new initiatives with the Canadian Apprenticeship Forum and Castle Building Centres Group Ltd. to advance support for apprentices, skilled trades professionals and business owners across Canada. These initiatives will expand access to specialized banking offers, financial literacy resources and scholarship support for the skilled trades community, the bank said.